Genghis Khan's Impact On Modern Civilizations

The way Genghis Khan led his nation is quite unlike any other ruler heard about in history. The positives are that he embraced religious freedom, even though Mongolians were basically shamanistic in religious beliefs, united many tribes together under one ruler, himself, banished torture though he was still brutal in the ways he would treat his enemies (negative), created new weapons and ways to overcome his enemies, conquered near 12m square miles of land, Modernized Mongol culture by opening up to trading between the West and East and Shaped the modern world of commerce and communication. However he also did not let anything stop him from reaching his goal - conquering and uniting the world under one empire. The negatives to his leadership

In history, what often occurs is that the worst of a civilization is remembered and not its legacy. The Mongol era is viewed as a small, destructive, and bloody period that left nothing behind. What started out as a group of nomads, led by Chinggis Khan, turned into the largest empire that had ever existed. The article focuses on how their legacy changed the world by building an empire with cross-cultural, religious, and economic exchange.

This paper discusses Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, and Julius Caesar. Alexander the Great was the leader of Macedonia from 336-323 B.C., Genghis Khan was the leader of Mongolia from 1206-1227, and Julius Caesar was the leader of Rome from 49-44 B.C.. , , These leaders were chosen because throughout history they have left an amazing legacy and accolades rarely seized by others. These three rulers will always be remembered as some of the best leaders the world has ever seen.

Genghis Khan impacted Asia greatly. It was his strict laws and absolute rule that pushed Asia out of the unfair treatment associated with the Hinduism caste system.

Did Genghis Khan and the Mongol Empire have a negative impact on the world? The Mongolian of the Asian Steppe had a positive impact on the world during their rule of the Asian continent from 1260 to 1368 by influencing Mongolian Commerce between China and Persia, Battle Tactics and having the largest empire. Genghis Khan was a great leader and had great battling skills for his empire, even though they lost in several battles and won many battles they never gave up and succeeded for a long time. The Mongolian Commerce was a big topic because they found several transportations, cities and routes. The Battle Tactics was an attack that had them all fighting for each other and having to believe that they could do it. The Mongol Empire was huge because all the Mongolians conquered a lot of Central Asia and China.

Although Genghis Khan’s empire fell, he created the second biggest empire this world has ever seen. He took a stand to create the largest empire he could, but it was a multi-step process. He had many rough experiences early in life, at a young age he learned the importance of making and allying with friends, and he knew how to make enemies fear his armies for their power and

Chinggis Khan was a prolific leader, predominantly known for his brutality in battle. While it is true that Chinggis was a formidable foe, he also possessed brilliant insight and vision. Once Chinggis clawed his way above his enemies, Chinggis would begin to change the environment around him. The first way in which Chinggis shaped his era was his unification of the Mongol tribes. The second way in which Chinggis shaped his era was with his military campaigns across Eurasia. The last method of change that I’ll mention was Chinggis’ change to culture. This amalgam of events, brought on by Chinggis, was a catalyst of change for Eurasia. This shift would impact not only the people residing in Eurasia, but the world as well.

The bubonic plague epidemic of the 1300s led to the destruction of the Mongol Empire by separating many areas in Eurasia from each other and wiping out millions of people. As a result, trade and communication vanished from the Mongol Empire, and it only worsened the political turmoil that was already present in the empire. Even after the destruction of the empire Genghis Khan had formed, many other empires were influenced by the Mongols and tried to incorporate many aspects of the Mongol Empire into their own. The empires that modeled after the Mongol Empire contributed to the image of Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Timur, a ruler in central Asia, and Montesquieu, a French philosopher, changed the image of Genghis Khan and the Mongols into one of subhuman barbarians for modern Europeans. Timur’s inhumane practices during his reign made Genghis Khan appear cruel. Furthermore, Montesquieu’s criticisms toward the Asians and Mongols created a growing negative stereotype. The modern Asians were interested in restoring a more positive image of Genghis Khan and the Mongols because these perceptions made themselves come off as savages, and the Europeans deployed conquests in Asia since they perceived the Asians to be enemies. Thus, the Asians decided to counter the harmful reputation they had accumulated by looking into the history of the Mongol Empire as a way to improve their own reputation.

Rulers between 600 B.C.E to 100 C.E. governed their empires in many different of ways, but all had an important role. The way the empires infrastructured their government, the strong opinion of having a single, strong leader as an emperor, and strong beliefs of different opinions on self-sacrificing throughout the empire are elements that have impacted our history tremendously, Without these elements all governing could have turned out to be completely different in present day.

The Mongols had a profound influence on world history. The profound, or very extreme, influence of the Mongols was because of the way the Mongols treated other people. Their army was ruthless to every city they came across. However, this was an effective form of the expansion of their empire. The Mongols’ immense empire required stability, law and order, and a method of unification. The trade routes and the period of peace accomplished all of these for the Mongols. The Mongols’ influence on world history was due to their great expansion of the empire and due to their unification by trade routes.

In conclusion, Chinggis Khan was a huge factor in the shaping of the world. He is a direct ancestor of one in twenty people, and is probably related to nearly everyone alive. His savagery and generosity were unseen in major rulers of his time, the former still being unseen. Chinggis Khan’s name is synonymous with ruthlessness, but he truly was the most civilized, merciful, and eco-friendly ruler of his time. (Ghenghis

The Mongols conquered more land in 25 years than the romance did in 400 years. The Mongols created a nation like Russia and even Korea. The Mongols created the first great free trade zone. Genghis Khan was a great leader who left a great empire even though it died out.

Genghis Khan, be unparalleled in conquerors history, is considered as the greatest military leaders of all time. His contiguous empire stretched from China to Europe controlling the largest empire in history. However, he himself never be greedy for gain. His driving force to rule the huge empire was the generosity. He distributed all of the spoils of wars to his able generals and his people. Genghis Khan born on the grass ger and died on the grass as well. He left nothing but to conquer rest of the lands he sees. Here is another man who accumulated more wealth than the most successful conqueror in history, but not know for generosity at the moment, John Davison Rockefeller.

The principal substance of the material is about how the present day globalization is homologous to the conveyance of messages during Genghis Khan’s era and how Genghis Khan was a salient benefactor to the conception of globalization. Some bias for the article is how the writer of the article stated “...his contributions to the integration of ethnicities and civilizations cannot be ignored,” this is bias due to the fact that the writer is only conveying the message that Genghis Khan is a great ruler and contributor and is not writing much of anything against him. Another source of bias in the article is when the writer wrote conspicuously more about how Genghis is a paramount and prominent contributor to ethics and civilization, as well as how the writer utilized more quotes on about how accomplished Genghis is,”Genghis Khan promoted globalization unlike other rulers before him.” I speculate that the author of the article desired the readers to comprehend a bit about globalization and how Genghis Khan was a substantial benefactor to it, while attempting to seem impartial as to whether Khan was a compelling and enticing leader. The audience intended for this article are students and historians to inform and enlighten them about historical globalization and Genghis Khan. This source heavily associates to historical globalization because throughout the article, an abundance of times, the author writes about how Genghis Khan was a significant contributor to

The following report will discuss the leadership qualities of Borjigin Temüjin and the organizational culture of his people, the Mongols. Readers might be confused on who Borjigin Temüjin is, he was the man known today as Genghis Khan. This paper will illustrate how Temüjin’s ability to lead developed by exploring his beginnings and how through his exceptional leadership skills he went on to create the largest contiguous empire in history. The first part of the paper will concentrate on Mongol culture in the 12th century, Temüjin’s upbringing in that culture and how he changed it through the consolidation of the many Mongol tribes. The second part will discuss the rise of Borjigin Temüjin to the post of Genghis Khan and