Genocide Essay

“Why is the killing of 1 million a lesser crime then the killing of one

If nations knew that there would be consequences to their calculations of profit from the genocide, that would cause them to lean towards the right and not the wrong. Taking away the benefits of any alliance or trade, to the ones that cause genocide would intensify the seriousness of their atrocities. Together, every member of all diplomatic nations, must have the right to intervene in military interventions. Solving the issue before it happened would have been helpful when the Serbians manipulated Bosnians by feeding the children cookies, and assuring them not to be afraid. The United Nations should have not been deceived by these actions, nor abandoned 25,000 Bosnians gathering in a United Nations base, wanting protection. Not only did the Unite Nations ignore this situation, but they claimed to not have any information about the Rwandan genocide that cause the deaths of 800,000 individuals. Therefore, we must hold our leaders accountable to their promises to alleviate the issues, otherwise they should be denied not to hold that

Genocide, it is not just murder, it is extermination. The world has lost an abounding amount of lives due to the vicious acts of genocide. There have been many ‘preventive’ measures being performed such as the conference in Montreal held in 2007. At said conference the United Nations (officials) not only spoke about preventing genocide, they also listened to 75 year-old, Marika Nene. Nene experienced the anti-gypsy massacres that occurred during World War II. “I had no choice. I had to give myself up to the soldiers (...) they violated me. I still have nightmares about it.” Genocide has affected millions of lives and Marika Nene is just one of them. Many have often inquired the following question, ‘can the world resolve the problem of genocide?’

Imagine living a life of fear, turmoil, with death all around. Hearing gun shots being fired, death chants, machete use, dead bodies everywhere. Afraid to close your eyes at night to rest, yet more afraid to wake up in the morning. To sustain your life and the life of your loved ones you must hide out, kill others, watch your neighbors be killed at the hands of the enemy. Knowing if you are caught you could be forced to murder your own family, be raped, be held captive, be starved to death, and most likely be killed. In 1994, this was the life many faced in Rwanda. “Rwanda has become a synonym for one of the worst genocides of the 20th century (Lemarchand, (n.d.), p. 483).

The US didn’t really help contribute to the genocide happening in Rwanda in 1994, they tried their best to keep a good distance from Rwanda as well. The US knew that the genocide was happening and we were well aware of the genocide. Bill Clinton found out about the genocide and didn’t show any sympathy or want to help Rwanda. He only worried about the media saying that US is doing nothing to help Rwanda, this media spread. The US claimed that they did not know the genocide was going on and failed to respond to the genocide in any way possible, things began to change but not significantly. Rwanda was not getting the attention they should have been getting when it was a major problem where over five people were killed each minute of the day.

The largest Ghetto was called Warsaw, which reached the highest population in march 1941 with 445,000 people. The Holocaust was also known as the Shoah. The people that participated in this where Adolf Hitler and his Natzi Germany and some collabortaors. Some certain group of people think that the Holocaust was not an act of genocide but it certainly was. The holocaust should be considered an act of genocide because they were killing large groups of people, they were from the same ethnic group and some were from the same nation.

In Germany in the 1940s, 6.5 million people were killed, all either belonged to the religious group of the Jews, were handicapped, or were gypsies. Rwanda consisted of two main ethnic groups, the Tutsi and the Hutu (Stephen 43). Throughout the years the ethnic group in power switched back and forth, the genocide of 1994 occurred because one group was viewed as the lesser group and ethnic hatred was spread throughout the country. In Darfur … If you add up the casualties in each genocide the total is 7.5 million to 8 million lives lost; 6.4 million in Germany, 500,000 to 1,000,000 in Rwanda, and 600,000 in Darfur. After the tragic events in Germany during World War II, America’s failure to learn from its past is shown when America fails to help or stop the genocides in Rwanda and Darfur, the people of America need to be educated on genocide and on what needs to be done to prevent

The United States is one of the most powerful countries in the world today. Sitting back and doing nothing is quite selfish. If the United States decides to lead the charge genocides around the world will stop. For example, in World War II when the U.S joined, Hitler was brought down quickly and it all ended. This shows that when the United States has intervened in the past it has worked.

When a country is going through something bad such as a genocide i feel like the world community should get together to do something about it. They should send an army or something with power to help those without power. Most times the minority groups in genocides are attacked such as the Tutsis in the Rwandan genocide. There also should be some sort of international court or third party country without any bias so that way both sides are heard and consequences are fair. It does take a long time to set up a court and organize one. For example in the Cambodian genocide a lot of the leaders died before they were charged for their crimes. In conclusion like I said before it was very helpful to have other countries help stop the genocide because as humans we need to help one another in hard times but those countries helping should be very natural.

Recommendations for preventing genocide is largely based on intelligence. You need to remain proactive; especially if there is mounting tension. Preventing armed conflict is the primary method, armed conflict not only builds hostilities but they parties involved are already equipped with weapons necessary to carry out attacks but motivated to do

Genocide can exist on its own in plain sight or hide behind the curtain of war, rebellion control, emergency policy, national threats etc. Those who are not proud to boast about it, try to hide it and diminish its connotation within their country and to outsiders. Genocide represents one of the darkest parts of humanity and human ability, the capability to systematically destroy large groups of people no matter the gender or age because of their differences. Usually even after the killing is over, even years down the line, the perpetrators still have no remorse over their

Today it is still subject of discussion, that denial of genocide is crime or it is just freedom of expression and has no character which infringes another’s rights, but nowadays legislation more defending position that denial of genocide have to be prevented because it consists elements of crime, also it is clear that in some countries denial of holocaust is prohibited, because this is clear history fact and no one argues about this, on the other side, maybe there are some other circumstances, but the result is that today several countries pass legislation by which they prohibit denial of holocaust and anti-Semitism.

The movie Ghosts of Rwanda was really eye-opening, and truly sad. The details of the genocide were frightening, but important to understand. This event proves that racism is a culprit of the genocide, just because of the lack of response from the big nations and those who have the resources to intervene. Within a few weeks, hundreds of thousands of people had been killed for no reason other than their nationality. This fact was evidently well broadcasted around the world, yet all states sat pointlessly by and watched this brutality take place. As the congressman from the United States stated that America has interests, but in this case, they just don’t have any for

It is my belief that genocide and crimes against humanity are two very distinct concepts. At the end of World War II they became part of international law. They were two totally new concepts and are relatively recent in terms of legislation. To put it simply the main difference between crimes against humanity and genocide are: Genocide basically focuses on not the killing of individuals but the annihilation of masses, for example the destruction of a race or religious group made up of individuals who share the same ethnicity or religion. Crimes against Humanity on the other hand Is the systematic mass murder of a large amount of individuals which constitutes a crime against humanity. I will be making comparisons between the Rwandan genocide

The United States government used military force to follow a policy of genocide toward the Native Americans. Politically, the policies of removal, concentration, and assimilation caused the death of thousands of Native Americans. Economically, the United States government used military force whenever any valuable resource was discovered on Indian Land. Socially, the near extermination of the Buffalo caused starvation and death among the tribes. The evidence clearly indicates that the United States government used military force and economic pressures to conduct a policy of genocide towards the Native Americans.