preview

George Edward Moore's Argument

Decent Essays
Open Document

In Rene Descartes writing, Mediations on First Philosophy, he reflects on his childhood and falsehoods he believed in his youth. In this piece of writing, the first skeptical hypothesis is found. The basic outline for this hypothesis is as follows, “If I don’t know I’m not in some skeptical scenario, then I don’t know p; I don’t know I’m not in a skeptical scenario; therefore I don’t know p.” There has been many responses to this argument, but the most successful argument was made by George Edward Moore. Moore’s response, which uses a Moorean Shift, counters the argument successfully due to its simplicity and verification by conditions. Moore’s response to skepticism was made in a simplistic way that is easy to understand. Moore raised his right hand and stated, “This is a hand,” then …show more content…

Here is one hand. 2. Here is another hand. ______________________________ C1. There are two hands. (1,2) C2. There are external objects. (C1) Both of these forms are logical and lack the complexity of some philosophical arguments. This makes it easy for the average person to understand. However, just stating these without evidence would not make his argument valid. To add evidence to these statements, Moore wrote Proof of an External World. This essay gave three conditions that an argument had to have in order to be effective. Moore verifies his argument using three conditions: the conclusion must be distinct from the premises, the premises must be known to be true, and the argument must be valid. It is clear that the first condition is met as the conclusion is distinct from the premises. The second and third conditions are harder to justify, but Moore explains in great detail. In regards to the second condition, we must look to see if the premises are known to be

Get Access