Bush’s legacy as president has been debated politically among scholars since he left office back in 2009. Bush gained the support of many Americans due to all that was accomplished as president and the legacy he left behind can be seen as beneficial to the United States regarding growth in the economy, war in the Middle East, and the overall well being of the American people. In contrast, some people do not concur with all the decisions that Bush made. Those who are anti-Bush see his two terms as a failure because of the multiple mistakes made that were not beneficial to the United States. Seven articles were written to display facts and examples that criticize, support, and give an opinion somewhere in-between: “George W. Bush’s Damaging Legacy: …show more content…
Bush in Hindsight,” by Ross Douthat “The GOP Needs to Talk About Bush: Part One,” by Walter Russell Mead “Walter Russell Mead’s Shallow and Misleading Attack on the Bush Legacy,” by Pete Wehner “The GOP and the Bush Legacy: Part Two,” by Walter Russell Mead and “The Bush Legacy,” by Charles Krauthammer. In the editorial article “George W. Bush’s Damaging Legacy” and the two articles written by Mead, Bush’s legacy is portrayed negatively in many ways. The editorial makes the claim that Bush is to be blamed for invading Iraq with questionable motives leading to 37,000 soldiers injured or killed. Also the Bush Administration’s legalization of the inhumane torture of captives is unacceptable. It states that Bush had no right to go to war in Iraq because there was no direct threat to the United States. In Part One of Mead’s article, he parallels the editorial by stating that even though Suddam Hussein was captured and killed after the war, even that didn't justify Bush’s decision to attack overseas. Various failures in international diplomacy, strategy, and conviction to the people are proof that Bush messed up. Mead clarifies how important and necessary all of these issues are when involved in a
On the evening of September 11, 2001, George W. Bush managed to change the country forever with a simple three letter word. President Bush gained numerous advantages following his renown speech. Many Americans lost their lives on 911 due to terrorism being used as a form of communication. Language is the cornerstone of all known societies and is essential for a country to thrive. Without language there is no understanding. Without understanding conflicts are inevitable.
The election of 1980 marked a ‘new political era’ that was ushered in by President Reagan and that followed on through the presidencies of George H. W. Bush and William Jefferson Clinton. These presidents were inaugurated at different times and succeeded the successes and the failures of their predecessors. Having came from different political backgrounds and having unique political and social beliefs, Bush, Reagan, and Clinton can only be analyzed through their foreign policies, domestic policies, achievements as well as shortcomings, and legacies.
While some would argue that the framers of the Constitution did enough to limit the power of the President because of actions carried out by the leaders of the past, the more valid perspective is that these actions were made based on personal goals, and that judgements on these actions are justified based on opinions—not facts. From this, it can be concluded that the authors of The Constitution of the United States have placed enough rules, regulations, and checks to successfully limit the power of the President. In this modern American world, social and governmental society is continuously developing and evolving over time; important decisions that drive this evolution are made everyday by people of great importance. One of these important
Since the year 2001 the United States has been under the presidency of a republican, George W. Bush. His has a position in a number of issues including abortion, immigration, the Iraqi war, health care, and social security. On the abortion issue he believes that we should ban partial-birth abortion and reduce abortions altogether and he supports adult stem-cell research but not embryonic stem cell research. He believes that the government should have a responsibility over Medicare and Medicaid. On the topic of social security he suggests that younger workers should be able to put part of their payroll taxes into personal retirement accounts. With the war in Iraq, President Bush is guided on the principle of "return on success" and we
Donald Trump’s campaign is serious. He built a complete voter base, does not mind being insulted by the media, and, to appeal to more voters, wrote a book titled Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again. The book successfully details his outline for how he will fix America using certain nuts and bolts. The idea of writing a book for conservative, politically active American voters makes sense, as it allows them to study the candidate’s political ideologies in depth without bias on how to interpret them from mass media. Each chapter’s introduction talks about a separate political problem, with the rest of the chapter left to describe how or why the introduction makes sense. Although his explanations may not make sense to the majority of liberals, he still manages to develop logos, in terms of the book, throughout the chapters.
Many would agree that being the President of the United States of America is not only one of the toughest positions one can hold; it is also the most nerve-wracking position one can have. Simultaneously, the president has many responsibilities, and often receive the blame for anything that occurs during their term. History always offer insights into a president’s second term. If there is one thing we know, we know that second presidential terms habitually do not turn out pleasant. The reason being is that most second-term presidents suffer from a lethal infection known as the “second-term curse” which is the result of scandals, financial declines, ostracized wars, and many other supplementary hitches. Presidents Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and George W. Bush are examples of some presidents who faced that curse.
One of the president’s main goals during their term is to leave a positive and lasting impression on the country. No man wants to be known for the way that they ruined the economy or lost the trust of the citizens because of their poor law making skills or their lack of leadership skills. The president that I chose to analyze was President William Jefferson Clinton. He may not have left the office as a saint, but he did leave an impression on the nation that makes him a well-respected president in America’s history.
The entire editorial board at the New York times decided to cooperate on an op-ed piece covered on Donald Trump concerning his post election actions and decisions. The Op-Ed was titled “What President Trump Doesn’t Get About America” and was published on the New York Times on January 20, 2017. The rhetorical situation behind the piece is the after-effects of Mr. Trump's official inauguration which took place on the same date the Op-Ed was published. The author's purpose and intended audience is to inform and persuade the American people that America was and will be fine even with some of the so-called harsh executive decisions of Trump.
Texas made way for many great things, frozen margarita machines, chili con carne, corn dogs, Whataburger, and Six Flags, but did you know a truly heroic, patriotic president also came from this fascinating state? George Walker Bush was born to the former president, George Herbert Walker Bush and the former first lady, Barbara Pierce Bush in New Haven, Connecticut, along with some of his brothers and sisters, Jeb, Neil, Marvin, Robin, and Dorothy. (Rountree, 1) Not only was his father into the politics, but also was his grandfather, Prescott Bush. Not only was Prescott a former banker for the world famous Wall Street, but he also happened to be a
It is widely accepted that George Bush Snr. was forced to play out his presidency in the mighty shadow of Ronald Reagan. Reagan's charm and personality was one of his greatest strengths and, even now, is widely revered for his time as President. Bush was reportedly always conscious of people's expectations of him in view of his predecessor and this burden seemed to weigh heavily. Reagan's achievements in Washington were considerable, if not in number then in impact. His political and strategic skills were impressive and Bush cannot be said to have equalled his achievements at home, and this is borne out by Bush's failure to win re-election.
Mere minutes after President Jimmy Carter was out of office, the Iran Hostage Crisis, for which his presidency is most remembered, was over. Behind him was a disjointed foreign and confused domestic policy. When he left office, Carter’s approval rating was 34 percent, and his disapproval rating nearly twice that (Roper Center). Today, it seems that he is a better ex-President than he was a president, as evidenced in his founding of the Carter Center, his cultivation of his presidential library, his contributions to Habitat for Humanity, and his numerous other humanitarian efforts. During his term, he had a poor relationship with Congress, a low approval rating with the American people, and a lack of cohesive international or domestic policy. I believe his two greatest failures are also the two which marked his entire presidency and caused the drop in his approval ratings: the confused and faltering domestic and international policies which lasted throughout his presidency and the Iran Hostage Crisis.
The legacy of Trump is nearly predetermined because of the theory of political time. Constitutional governance may currently be stretching, but it is not vulnerable. By default, he is a better president than individuals such as Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, and Herbert Hoover. While many political commentators argue Trump's "presidency is a failure… [because] his moral character and self-serving leadership" (The Gazette), for this exact same reason, his presidency has accomplishments. Using rhetoric, "the most influential [tool]...
The President of the United States is granted numerous powers when they assume office. Some of these powers are listed and explained in the Constitution of the United States. Some are not, and this often leads to Presidents stretching their duties too far, or until someone brings a complaint against them. The powers that are being spoken of are formal, implied, and informal powers. All can lead to good and bad. This paper sits out to discuss the successes and failures of these powers through the lens of a specific president, in this case Lyndon Baines Johnson or for short “LBJ.” Throughout the paper the reader will learn of various policy objectives, how the powers enabled passage or non-passage of the objectives, and some constraints Presidents
The modern presidency has in a sense become a double-edged sword in that presidents have become beneficiaries of anything positive that can be attributed to government, but also can be blamed for anything bad occurring in society. Quite simply, the modern president has become the center of our political system (The Modern Presidency, 2004). The men who have dealt with this double-edged sword known as the modern presidency have often walked a very fine line between effectiveness and ineffectiveness, but all have attempted to use their power in one way or another.
George W. Bush led the country during a time of great challenge and change. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the global war on terror, the war in Iraq, and the economic downtown of 2008 are just some of the major events that Bush had to contend with during his time in office. At different times, President Bush was both the most popular president and one of the least popular presidents in American history.