George Washington Crossing The Delaware Compare And Contrast

George Washington and John Paul Jones are very different people. But in some ways they are alike. For example, they both fought in the Revolutionary War. That was an example of how they are alike. You can compare and contrast many things, but in this case it is comparing George Washington and John Paul Jones.

General Washington was respected not just by the rank and file, but also by people in all parts of the colonies. Although he did not inspire his men to fanatical loyalty as Napoleon or Nelson, the troops under his command knew they could count upon his valor, military judgment, and fair justice always. (Morison, p. 314-5) Everyone, from the highest gentleman in Congress to the lowest private in the Army, could depend on George Washington's character at all times.

Washington Crossing the Delaware depicts the struggle of Washington and his men on their way to a historic victory at Trenton on Christmas morning. Both the painting and the poem depict the hardships and triumph of the crew in similar ways while also being very different. The painting of Washington crossing the Delaware better depicts the hardships and triumph of the crew.

Through vivid descriptions of George Washington, I learned that he was not the best military leader. There were multiple times in the war where Washington was faced with difficult decisions, and proved to be very indecisive. Also, there were times where action needed to be taken, but he couldn’t decide what to do. Even though I learned Washington wasn’t as great as the history books explain him to be, it makes me respect him more to know that he, just like any other American, flawed.

Emmanuel Leutze’s painting Washington Crossing the Delaware shares some similarities with David Shulman’s poem “Washington Crossing the Delaware”; however, the dissimilarities are more abundant. These works of art and literature portray the scene of that remembered Christmas day when Washington and his army set out to conquer to Hessian people. Although they have similarities, there are some differences in these works that are nothing less than noticeable. Join me in observing the similarities and dissimilarities in these pieces.

Joseph Ellis sets out to make George Washington, the person we think of as an icon, into a real person. He wants to show us what makes him tick. He wants to turn the marble into the man. So many students today see George Washington as a memorial, a monument, a face on a dollar bill, and the man who could not lie when he cut down the cherry tree. He wants to show us the man George Washington was in his day. Ellis’s method was to divide George Washington’s life into three main parts:

Leutze’s painting, Washington Crossing the Delaware, conveys that the people of America can overlook their differences and hardship when being unified by hope. He uses pathos in the color contrast in his painting to inspire feelings of hope in the unity of America. Dark color seems to loom, almost pushing upon the ships in the painting. Nevertheless, light surrounds the ships, seeming to flow from the American flag on the first ship. The American flag is a symbol of hope for the men on these ships, each of them being drastically different. The men gathered on these ships are all drastically different . George Washington himself is there, a highly respected general among common folk and even an African American man. Each of these men different in race, rank, and opinion are unified under a flag that represents each different person as a single people for the hope that they can earn their freedom. Despite the pressing darkness the flag shines a light of hope as a symbol of unity for the people of America. The pathos used in

“Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty” (Kennedy 1). In the words of Kennedy, as Americans we will do anything to ensure our liberty. This brings up a good question to how America was really founded. There are a lot of people and events that went into the foundation of America, but two of the most important are George Washington and the Constitution. Both worked hand in hand in order to give us the America we know and love today.

William Howe, George Washington, and Richard Howe each hoped to lead their countries to victory during the American Revolution. However, they did not have the same level of experience, their views differed, and each one of them had a different approach to leading an army. Despite their differences, they were all great leaders that are still acknowledged today. I believe that William Howe was the best leader amongst these three because he was experienced, learned from his mistakes, and wanted to achieve his goals regardless of the consequences. William Howe, born on the 10th of August 1729 to parents Emmanuel and Charlotte Howe, had a childhood of comfort and luxury. His close relation to the royal family helped him gain opportunities as

After Colonies declared independence from Great Britain in 1776, they spent several years of thinking about how to rule a new country without becoming another monarchy country. So, they nominated George Washington to be the first president and John Adam as the first vice president. After George Washington retired from president, John Adam run for presidency and won the second presidential election over Thomas Jefferson. Obviously, he became the second president of United State. The presidency of John Adam was overshadowed with both domestic and foreign issue known as the Alien and Sedition Acts, the XYZ affair and the election of 1800.

Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were very paramount to the success of colonial America in the Revolutionary War. Despite both being very excellent leaders, they were both very different; Jefferson resided on political issues while Washington preferred working with actual conflict. George Washington liked to be in the thick of things, in the heat of battle. He would often ride out into the middle of gunfire on a trusty stead with little to no hesitation. His bravery was astonishing, but what was even more incredible was his military strategizing and planning.

Constantino Brumidi was a painter with an undying love for America; a passionate fire of gratitude spurred his creation of several murals for the capital of the country he held so dearly, the most famous of which being The Apotheosis of Washington. However, these feelings culminated into a ridiculous painting that ignored the basic elements of art and would have offended Washington, creator and All-American icon, himself.

Washington Crossing the Delaware is an oil-on-canvas painting by German American artist Emanuel Gottlieb completed in 1851. This painting is used as a reference of the day when General George Washington crosses the Delaware River with his continental army on the night of December 25, 1776, during the American Revolutionary War. This event is considered to be the first move in a sudden attack done against the German Hessian allied mercenary forces at Trenton, New Jersey in the Battle of Trenton which took place on the next morning of December 26th. Battle of Trenton was a small but a major contribution in the American Revolutionary War. General Washington driven the primary part of the continental army against the hessian soldiers who surrounded the entire Trenton after crossing the Delaware River on the night of December 25, 1776. The continental army with least damage overpowered the hessian soldiers in a short battle with them. This short battle greatly accelerated the continental army’s flagging attribute and motivated re-recruitments. Gottlieb painted three versions of this painting out of which the original was a part of the collection at the Kunsthalle in Bremen, Germany, and afterwards was destroyed in a bombing raid in 1942 during World War II. The other two paintings, one of which is now in possession of The Minnesota Marine Art Museum and another one is at Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

The work I have selected to look closely at is Parson Weems’ Fable “Grant Wood” created by Mason Locke Weems or sometimes referred to as Parson Weems. He created this painting in 1939 to tell the story of young George Washington and his inability to lie. The medium of this painting is oil on canvas and is currently in the Amon Carter Museum of American Art, Fort Worth, Texas. The painting has a width of 127.3 cm by a height of 97.5 cm. This painting has main components that grab the attention of who is looking at it. In the painting, older George Washington is outside the frame showing what happened during the incident between young George Washington and his father. This painting created a fable that would later be known as the reason why

The Washington Family by Edward Savage, painted from 1789-1796, features American’s original “First Family.” (Fig. 1) George Washington sits around a table in his Mount Vernon home with his wife, Martha and her two grandchildren, whom the Washingtons adopted following the death of their parents. Behind them, a household slave stands ready to serve and a vast landscape sprawls outside the window. Though the painting appears to be a simple, family portrait, it actually contains deeper, political messages.