preview

George Washington's Secret Six: The Spies That Changed Nothing

Better Essays

George Washington’s Secret Six: The Spies That Changed Nothing What should someone expect from a historical narrative about the revolutionary war written by a Fox News co-host? An agenda pushing, shamelessly biased story about American patriotism and bravery perhaps? If that is the case, George Washington’s Secret Six by Brian Kilmeade does not disappoint. Kilmeade portrays the “Secret Six,” also known as the Culper Spy Ring, as heroic patriots responsible for “saving the cause for liberty.” Anyone reading the book for anything more than an exciting spy story will see the holes in the evidence Kilmeade has endeavored to compile, and may go on to realize how biased the book is. Kilmeade has produced a historical narrative that is clearly biased toward the Patriots, and fails to back up its thesis with …show more content…

This is a laughable assertion. Because congress was unwilling to levy taxes on the colonies, they had opted to print currency. To anyone that understands inflation, this may seem illogical. By increasing the amount of paper money, the value of each unit decreases. This is not good for anyone that has money, but it is great for those in debt. If you need to pay someone $100 in a month and the currency inflates to the point where $100 is now only able to buy you things that $50 used to, then you are only paying someone have as much as before. The government, which had thousands of debts to soldiers, property owners, and others, made off pretty well as a result. In the end, the government and states printed an unbelievable 450 million dollars until March of 1780. That was when they stopped, but the British did not have anything to do with it. They were just done using that strategy. At that point the paper to specie ratio (paper money compared to the coin equivalent) was 2%. It would drop to .5% in 1782

Get Access