Get On The Bus Analysis

Many scientists have a difficult time understanding homosexuality on the evolutionary aspect. They believe a human beings’ main purpose is reproduction, which makes the sexual relationship between two males a confusing concept for most evolutionary thinkers (McKnight 1). Evolutionary thinkers believe that the less desirable genes are removed from the system when they are not breed as often, but this cannot be said for homosexual males who have been a continuing presence in most societies over numerous generations (McKnight 1). These evolutionary thinkers, like most humans, have a need to place others into

A highly debated issue concerning homosexuality is whether sexual-orientation is biologically determined or if it is a socially learned behavior. One case study done about this topic gathered that “the homosexual desire seems in most cases to be implanted in those who develop an unusually strong attachment for one parent” (Cory 1951:67). This seems to suggest that homosexuality can be influenced by family structure or other sociological elements. On the other side of this argument, there is the belief that people are born either gay or straight. Even though there is no scientific or genetic evidence to prove this, there have been many studies done and most homosexuals interviewed take this view-point. McIntosh states, “[homosexuality] is still commonly seen as a condition characterizing certain persons in the way that birthplace or deformity might characterize them” (1968:182). To support their cause and to fight for acceptance in society, it would be beneficial to convince people that sexual orientation is biologically determined. “Research indicates that people who believe that homosexuality is a choice are more likely to condemn it than are those who believe gays and lesbians are born that way”

Social injustice is any issue when unfair practices are being carried out in society. Social injustice effects many groups today, especially minorities. Societal isms are the prejudicial attitudes directed against groups that society identifies as “lesser”-less capable, less productive, and less normal.

Social injustice can range from anything such as; immigrants being depicted in the U.S, to a women getting yelled out by a man because of her social position. Social injustice can be seen all over our society. However, with the exception of some situations being greater then others, it can be agreed that social conflict is everlasting and ever-changing in our society.

In the past gender inequality gap between men and women was extremely huge as the land and the sky. Society entirely excluded women from almost everything such as learning, working, politic participating and so on. They received no rights, attentions, or protections at all, yet they always took responsibilities for the blames society had on them. The only reasons they existed was to stay at home cooking, cleaning, and taking care of their husbands and children. Although some critics might think of that as an essential role back then, women obtained completely no says in their families. Their husbands made all the decisions and told them what to do since those men were the ones who got jobs and fed the whole families. Throughout many uprisings,

Essay 4 in The Matrix Reader “Masculinity as Homophobia” by Michael S. Kimmel explains the definition of manhood and how it has helped to create the concept of homophobia in a societal sense rather than a scientific one. Kimmel states that “Manhood is neither static nor timeless; it is historical,” and “…not the manifestation of an inner essence; it is socially constructed,” and “…does not bubble up to consciousness from our biological makeup; it is created in culture.” (pp.44) In today’s society, being a man has many stereotypes, and the legalization of gay marriage puts those stereotypes to test.

Social injustice is an issue that can take on many forms. Social injustice is a problem worldwide. An example of people protesting social injustice is NFL players kneeling for the National Anthem. Many players decided to kneel but that was generally frowned upon and a lot of players stopped doing this. The first player to do this was Colin Kaepernick, Kaepernick said the reason he was kneeling was because “I am not going to stand up to show pride to a country that oppresses black people and people of color” (Wyche). He eventually lost his job over it. He said that he was doing this as a protest against social injustice, but eventually his original reason for kneeling was lost.

Society has always been able to cope with having two opinions about a situation. For example as we continue to debate over the issue of homosexuality, many sub-debates have come forward from this topic. For instance, debates of marriage, gay rights within the spectrum of laws and regulations all construct an ensuing point of debates amongst people (Slife, 2013, p. 160). In fact, the more powerful debate about homosexuality is the claim that homosexuals were born that way. Essentially, both sides of the spectrum have done intensive research to answer a specific question, is homosexuality biologically Based?

The relationship between social justice and public health policy is inversely related. According to Benjamin (2015) “Health equity means social justice”; however, even though the intent of social justice and public health policy is to reduce the amount of health disparity among marginalized populations, sometimes it can create disadvantages to some groups while attempting to help another. An example of a legislation that attempts to improve health equity among a marginalized population is the Health Equity and Accountability Act (HEAA). The HEAA legislation aims to “reduce ethnic and racial disparities in health care access and outcomes” (National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health).

Social injustice is quite possibly the sneakiest and most infamous crime in all of the world. A crime that is committed right under the noses of innocent people, but do these people even know what a social injustice is? Social justice is the concern for human rights and whether or not these rights are equally distributed to people of different cultures, religions, social status, and gender. Social injustice occurs whenever human rights are stripped from the public. A social injustice that was particularly prominent was the cholera outbreak of 2010 in Haiti. This social injustice involved a legal dispute trying to assume money to help victims of the cholera outbreak, but was shut down due to

Formed in 2000, Rai Ko Ris is a female fronted punk rock/hardcore band from Kathmandu, Nepal. They sing about socio-political issues in and outside Nepal. Most of their songs reflect downright anti-capitalist, socialist and feminist views. On The Bus in The UK is a song about the struggle of brown people living in the West and their difficulty to assimilate with the Whites. It is also about alienation of brown people from the Western society and racism experienced in everyday life. The song also draws a parallel between the history of Nepal and the settlement of Nepali citizen in the UK since 1965. After the partition of India in 1947, Nepal signed an agreement with UK and India to transfer four Gurkha regiments from the Indian army to the

On the other hand, another injustice that is apparent in our society is inequality. It causes us to feel insecure, unimportant and unequal. People make others feel less with words and actions. Sometimes we do it subconsciously, meaning that we don’t think of the outcome and the damage that we cause them emotionally. When that happens, people feel like they don’t

Homosexuality is defined as a romantic attraction, which includes or causes sexual behavior and sexual temptation between two same gendered human beings. American Psychological Association states that homosexuality is "an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions". (American Psychological Association 2008) In today’s society, more and more people started to pay attention on the sexual orientation issue, which causes homosexuality has become a hot and popular debatable topic not only in our general daily lives, but also discussed in religious and science field. Biologists, scientists and other scholars are trying so hard to find out some useful and convictive statistics as the evidences to prove their ideas on the nature VS nurture issue. The key concern about this topic is: does sexual orientation totally determined by genetic factors, or it is hugely influenced by the nurture environment around the homosexual person? In this argument paper, I will be presenting 2 different ideas with my own analysis.

Sex is one of the most natural activities humans do. Yes, physically sex can be very pleasurable, but it is a bond two persons share in an attempt to connect in a more intimate way. Why is sex between a heterosexual couple accepted, but homosexual sex is not? What sets the standards for what is natural and what is unnatural? Standards based on the personal opinions mean the various activities of everyday life are in a sense unnatural. In America, seeking medical assistance when sick is normal while in other places across the world, holistic medicine is performed. Therefore, what is deemed natural and unnatural based on cultural and individual norms is not a valid argument against homosexuality. Diverting from the societal norms does not make something unnatural, but unfamiliar. A large amount of the activities that we do are not considered normal. Would we consider riding a unicycle wrong because very few people do it? The answer is no. Morality is not based on what’s considered usual, but what’s best for everyone. Homosexuality is natural and should be treated as such by all. In this paper, I will be defending Corvino’s objections to the discontent for homosexuality. When someone is born and grows up attracted to someone of the opposite sex it is considered normal, so why do people believe homosexuality is unnatural? Isn’t it the same thing in reverse?

The question of what causes some people to be sexually attracted to members of their own gender generates many different answers. In recent years, startling new research (Barinaga, 1993, p.17) has indicated that homosexuality is possibly inherited and determined by biological differences in Brain structure and genes. This study raises an interesting question: If homosexuality is hereditary, is there any basis for societal discrimination against something innate? If it is nature, it is good. If it is good, it should be accepted. A genetic component in sexual orientation would send a message to homosexuals and the society that homosexuality is not a fault, and not the fault of anyone other than nature. Gays and lesbians are born in nature, just like some people who are inherited left-handed gene from their parents.