Get Rid Of Sports In Schools

Many people are debating whether or not school sports should be removed due to the critical consequences they are having on young athletes academic, and social lives. Studies have proven that cutting sports from schools can improve students grades in a plethora of ways. Therefore, school sports should be taken away to prevent students from failing classes, save districts money, and allow children the study time they need.

Since students already spent a great amount of time on school they should not participate in sports after school . Students should not spend more time on physical activities that are not needed rather than homework that will help with grades in school. Therefore, schools should not have after school sports because it will improve student’s grades, give them more time for homework, and schools will save money.

Schools should get rid of sports. Although many people think that sports are relaxing and stress relieving; numerous studies say that for sport players in particular, the lack of time to do work and sleep is crushing them socially, physically, and academically. Therefore, districts should get rid of after school sports because the cost is extreme, this would aid students academically, and they are a

Recently American test scores have been down but the first thing people blame for this epidemic is sports. Instead of looking at the infrastructure of our school system. Sports are ingrade in American culture and how we life so to just take them away would be dractace. Sports should stay in schools because the keep kids out of trouble, help kids get better grades, and it helps them later on in their life.

According to Ripley “80 percent of students passed their classes [after their district canceled sports], compared with 50 percent the previous fall” (11). She goes on to mention that Nathan, a prior quarterback for the same district, said that you couldn’t fall behind on schoolwork because sports weren’t taking up your time (Ripley 11). This information is important because it demonstrates that athletics are causing student failure, which is undoubtedly reprehensible. It is plainly shown that school sports are causing academic failure which will greatly deteriorate student’s futures, and in turn, the world’s

I believe we should get rid of after school sports, because schools are going over budgets, and kids are getting distracted from school. Yes many people believe we should keep sports because they help students relieve stress and help students relax; but they have caused schools to go over budget and scholars grades have dropped.Therefore, schools should get rid of after school sports because districts cannot afford them, kids are getting distracted, and scholars grades will improve.

The thought of eliminating sports from schools have become very popular in the last couple of years. Recent studies have shown that sports bring down children academically. Therefore, schools should eliminate sports to allow students more time to study, bring up kids grades, and improve financial issues. People who have gone through school know how important it is to study in order to familiarize themselves with the material taught. In “Should Your School Get Rid of Sports?”, Amanda Ripley states that a former quarterback that attends a school with no sports says, ¨there was all this extra time, you never go behind on your work¨ (11).

In the article “Should Your School Get Rid Of Sports?” an article written by Amanda, states that the “state of Texas had threatened the Premont Independent School District to shut it down because of financial problems and academic issues”, so the school shut down all sports and realized the school can save $150,000 in one year (10).More specifically, “new bleachers cost about half a million dollars, maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year, and also they have to buy a bus for cheerleaders and the band players” (Amanda 10). Schools can save over $150,000 with no school sports. This is important because sports can lead to financial problems and academic failure. Now that you know this will be important for districts to quit school sports because it can put districts in debt and students can seek higher success in their

In Ripley’s article she said that when the Superintendent of Premont Independent School District Ernest Singleton canceled school sports the district saved $150,000 that year (11). In her article she states, “Maintaining a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year.”(Ripley 11). Because of these high costs schools should use the extra money for upgrading their academic tools. The evidence clearly states that the costs can have a gigantic effect on the school's budget.

Whenever someone goes to a school they are going to see that they have a sports team; however, people do not know how much these activities actually cost. According to author Amanda Ripley in a recent article about sports, she states that a grass field can cost more than $20,000 a year (2). “For travel games, schools pay for the busses for teams and also for the band, cheerleaders, and hotels” (Ripley 4). This evidence shows that schools have money but they’re using on sports; instead of using the money on sports they can use it on the education or new technology for the school. Therefore if districts want to save any money they should really consider suspending after school sports.

For many years, schools have been debating whether to keep sports for students or get rid of them. If the schools were to cancel their programs, they would not only save on money for schools and families, they would give other activities a chance, and improve their academic grades. Therefore, school sports should be eliminated to cut costs, give students an opportunity for other activities, and improve students grades.

At the end of a long, stressful day at school, you look out to the field where you will soon be with your friends, enjoying the sun on your skin and working off the stress of your cooped up day at school, with your favorite sport, of course. The article “Should Your School Get Rid of School Sports?” has two very strong point of views. Part one, “Yes! It’s Time to Scale Back” by Amanda Ripley argues that we should get rid of school sports. However, part two, “No! Sports Are More Important Than Ever” by Tim O’Shei argues that we should keep school sports. School sports can be expensive, but there are many more benefits and reasons for having sports at school than getting rid of them.

Which is more important, sports or education? In America, sports seem to be the winner. Athletes get paid about 53 million dollars a year, compared to the 58,170 dollars teachers get paid. Another way sports wins is that sports are now a huge part of school, but should they? Schools shouldn’t be in school because academic impact, financial impact, and family impact.

People think that sports get into the way of people having good grades. They also think that it gives the students a false sense of success or achievement. People say that school and sports will never go together because they send their kids to school to learn and not play. There are some that go as far as to say that high school football will not further advance their lives if they don’t make a real team.

The article explains that sports dictate when the school day should begin so there is more practice time for teams after school (Ripley 11). A former student from Premont states that “there was all this extra time” and “you never get behind on work” (Ripley 11). This shows that even the students from the high school agreed that with no athletic programs, they had more time to work on assignments. This is a significant change to what schools would be getting if they had school sports.