Gladiator Vs Trailer

There are a lot differences between the High Noon and the “Tin Star , those differences make the movie better. Some of the changes make the movie more different, but they make it better. Most of these changes made the story different from the movie

Although the story is better, the movie version shares some scenes with the story version. In both versions, the madman waits until the 8th night of watching

Personally speaking, I prefer the movie to the play. Granted, the play may have deep, underlying meanings, but to me, it wasn 't very moving or emotional. The additions made in the movie help to more clearly define the roles of good and evil, and play on the hidden feelings people have. I think most of the additions, if not all, were appropriately made and were quite successful. I enjoyed both the movie and our reading of the play very much, but again, I would have to say that I prefer the

In the movie they very graphically show the hangings of some specific characters. I consider this a big difference because they have a different view of importance on the event. the play apparently does not show enough dramatic emphasis on the hanging of innocent accused victims. The movie shows the hanging and very well emphasizes the hanging by showing graphic details such as the ropes around their necks and their feet hanging from the opened trap doors in the underneath stage the hanging takes place on. The director of the movie and the director and author of the play have different views on the hanging and it makes a big difference in the

Unlike the first, the boy actually lost his mother from a battle with cancer. This shows how different our world is today. It also shows his motivation behind his urge to dance and his movement against the council in the town. The second movie has the same script and outline as the first. The difference is the way the characters walk, talk, and act. They wear clothes that are more dated to our pop culture now. Also this movie is different in the fact that nowadays it would be very rare and very uncommon for a city to ban dancing. Have you seen Miley Cyrus lately? I mean she isn’t the first to do something crazy. In my opinion, this second movie is viewed and focused more along the lines of the love story between the boy and the rebellious girl. The film and the tunes were intertwined to create a pop-culture phenomenon unlike any we're likely to see anymore, outside of perhaps "Glee," simply because we consume entertainment so differently 27 years later (Lemire). I personally love the second one, but it wasn’t a big deal to everyone like the first was. I never even knew about it until it came on the television one day while I was bored watching TV. Our culture today is more worried and focused on other things. No one cares about old timey tales of little things that government or church kept us from doing. Everyone pretty much does what they want to.

Gore, drama, and action. These are what most people pay Hollywood to show them at the screens. The movie gladiator from the year 2000 is no different. The movie gladiator is a movie with contents that does not align itself historically. Rather it is tainted with a bit of historical accuracy resulting it to be more difficult to discern the accuracy of the movie as it is now ambiguous for which part of the movie is unreliable and reliable. Nevertheless, this paper will be contrast the content of the movie with the historical accuracy of some of the event, the people in the plot, and the gladiatorial combat in the movie, proving the lack of historical revelevancy.

     First off, the biggest difference is the time periods of each movie. The older movie was set in Early Renaissance times. The newer movie is set in the early ninety’s. Another difference is the use of special effects. In the

Not all gladiators were brought to the arena in chains. While most early combatants were conquered peoples and slaves who had committed crimes, lured by the thrill of battle and the roar of the crowds, free men began voluntarily signing contracts with gladiator schools in the hope of winning and prize money, but not me I was poor and needed prize money to live. Female slaves were regularly condemned to the arena alongside their male counterparts, but a few citizens took up the sword of the own free will. The gladiators won massive fame among the lower classes. Our portraits graced the walls of many public places, also children played with gladiator action figures made of clay; and the most successful fighters even endorsed products. It’s been a couple of days since i’ve won the battle in the colosseum. The opponent's family is angry at me for the death of the gladiator.

Comparison: Temple Grandin vs. Invictus The film Invictus tells the story of a divided nation and its president who tries to heal old wounds prevalent from decades of racial segregation by way of the apartheid laws in South Africa, and his relationship with the nation’s rugby team. The film Temple Grandin is about the life of a young woman of the same name, born with autism in a time when the condition was understood very little and respected even less so, and how she overcomes the obstacles of her situation to achieve incredible feats. Of the two movies we watched this semester, Temple Grandin and Invictus, both had excellent and inspiring stories, with underdog characters who overcome incredible odds. Both films inspired, and educated me

The movie Gladiator is based on a fictional storyline that takes place during the time of Ancient Rome. After having learned about Ancient Rome and the fashions of that time, I can say that the film Gladiator had both accurate and inaccurate representations of Ancient Roman fashion throughout. Some of the costumes, hair and makeup shown in the movie were accurate, while others were not.

I personally liked the movie better because i like adventurous movies and i like to see what others have to go through to get to where they wanna be. It was super interesting seeing how badly Odysseus fought and went through so much just so he could get home to his family. I also liked watching the movie more because i have to see things visually to understand what's actually going on. One of the best scenes would be the

Gladiator is in the manner that the main characters became slaves/gladiators and the aspect of how “freedom” is earned. Maximus on the other hand, was a Roman General that refused to serve for the Roman new emperor, Commodus, who had murdered his father, Marcus Aurelius, in order to obtain control of the Roman Empire. The biggest difference between Gladiator and Spartacus is the manner in which their respective freedom is earned. Gladiators freedom is earned thru defeating Commodus, who sentences Maximus to be executed. The story begins after he escapes his captors and rides off to his farm. This is after he discovers that his family has been murdered by said King/Emperor Commodus. Maximus collapses from exhaustion and is then picked up by slave traders and sold to Proximo, thus leading to his voyage of becoming a Gladiator and his fight against the King. Another difference is that Spartacus is pressured into fighting the best gladiator of the Roman army, upon the conclusion of his training however, he is defeated. Afterward he becomes leader of the Army of Slaves and in an effort to gain the slaves freedom back, he leads them to battle. After being captured, Spartacus ultimately has to fight it out with a slave who is also captured and the winner will be crucified. In Gladiator, Gladiators from all over the Roman

The second reason I like it is that there is suspense. In the first battle they met a monster but he did not strike right away. So, you are on the edge of your seat because you are waiting for the monster to attack or for the monster to do something bad. The in a couple

Finally, the last thing that was unfair was how the audience influenced if the gladiators lived or died. The reason why I say this is because sometimes the audience could choose if the gladiators would die. The way they would do this is by giving a thumbs up or a thumbs down. What a thumbs up means is that it was a excellent fight, and they spare the losing gladiator’s life. But that usually wasn’t the case. They most likely would give a thumbs down, and that meant that the winning gladiator would strike his opponent with a sword. They did this because the audience found it entertaining. Also, according to history.com they said that the audience was unfair to the gladiators, because they yell things like “burn him, or flog him,” which also influenced whether the gladiators would die or not. Even if the gladiators fought a great

- The antagonist in the story, he is the son of Marcus Aurelius. Commodus is an arrogant man who lusts for power which led him into killing his own father and would do anything to get rid of anyone that may threaten his claim to the throne.