Gladwel Gladwell Analysis

Starting in Chapter 6 Gladwell presents us with the mysterious and seemingly inexplicable series of events that occurred in Harlan, Kentucky in the 19th century to introduce the enormous effect of cultural legacies.

In my opinion, you did an excellent job on the summary of the Outliers, Chapter 1, concise and to the point. Most people would agree with Gladwell’s findings that the individuals born in January through March birthdays had more time to develop, it is logical. Do you suspect Gladwell purposely chose this chapter to be first in the book, with the intention that we would find his other writings just as fascinating and be swayed to agree with his assumptions during the rest of the book?

In this part of the apparent book, instead of starting with a miraculous origin story, Gladwell decided to start the chapter off with a tale about a town in the backcountry. He uses the town of Harlan, Kentucky to set up his claim that have ties with success. Sure, the populus’ ancestors of the town was feuding a lot among each other, they had to do it to survive. Gladwell makes this clear throughout the chapter. Those ancestors, first settlers, town founders, basically anyone who lived particularly in the town before this relevant era, made the cultural legacy of the town and surrounding areas. Cultural legacy is a key factor to obtain success.

Extra Credit: In this chapter, Gladwell does address and disprove a counterargument that everyone came from hardworking hunter-gatherers. Gladwell disproves this by showing that hunter-gathers diet was largely “a rich assortment of fruits, berries, roots, and nuts” (Gladwell 233) which isn’t that difficult to find. They didn’t grow crops, nor raise animals, so they never had any hard work that needed to get done. This shows that not everyone has the same hard working background that the Asians do, and their ore each culture grows different individuals that show different

This plays a role in the story as the author constantly tries to define how certain individuals are more successful than others. Throughout the outliers, Gladwell attempts to question how success is made from asians having a higher intelligence in math, to the months of successful hockey players, and how certain individuals succeed without studying. By looking at ways

"The biggest misconception about success is that we do it solely on our smarts, ambition, hustle and hard work” (Gladwell, 42). Outliers is a book that praises the success of great men, then cuts them down to size by explaining how it wasn’t pure hard work and sweat. Gladwell studies those who have already achieved society’s idea of “success.” Every chapter is filled with detailed examinations of cultural heritage and environment in relation to the idea of “success”.The Other Wes Moore by Wes Moore is a detailed analysis that undergoes a comparison between two characters with outwardly similar beginnings but entirely different destinies due to personal choices, self-determination, and effort. The book values the importance of discipline and

What is an Outlier? As defined by Gladwell (2008), it is “1: something that is situated away from or classed different from the main or related body, 2: a statistical observation that is markedly different in value from the others of the sample” (p. 3). Gladwell (2008) examines multiple stories and circumstances of successful people and deeply analyzes natural talent compared to opportunity. Specifically, are socially described “talented” people naturally gifted or are they exposed to certain circumstances and opportunities during their lives which ultimately mold them?

In Blink by Malcolm Gladwell presents and creates very fascinating terminologies to describe split-Second processes that human mind undergoes to make important decisions. One of the term that he uses in Blink is “thin slicing”. Malcolm Gladwell defines this term as “the ability of our conscious to find patterns in situations and behavior based on very narrow slice of experince”(23). What this means is your brain is able to “subconsciously gathers the necessary information for sophisticated Judgments”(23) from previous experience. In Blink Gladwell presents a lot of examples to make you better understand the meaning of thin slicing and when it takes place. Also In are lifes we use thin slicing in daily basis but we do not know when thin slicing

Practice can be the key to improving. In every area of education, in every sport, with every musical activity, anything that requires a good performance, those who practice tend to understand the material more. Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers states just how important this can be. Going off of the idea that “practice makes perfect”, his entire second chapter is dedicated to persuading his audience to believe 10,000 hours is what it takes to succeed. Examples Gladwell provides include how Mozart didn’t create his greatest works until later in his life after he had gained experience, how the Beatles performed in multiple practice concerts in Hamburg, Germany before becoming musical sensations, and how Bobby Fischer and chess grandmasters

The Outliers, by Malcolm Gladwell, attempts to disprove the widely-accepted myth that successful people attain their success entirely through hard work and dedication. Gladwell insists that outliers, or extraordinary achievers, are beneficiaries of opportunity, and owe their feats largely to chance. Gladwell aims to convince that “…the values of the world we inhabit and the people we surround ourselves with have a profound effect on who we are” (Gladwell 11), through various case studies, in which the subjects’ achievements can be attributed to their environments and circumstances.

I do believe that innate talent is a real and has a factor in determining one’s success in a certain field. Through the study of genetics, innate talents are proven to be real and can be founded in the traits people are born with. For instance, arm length is a remarkable factor in sports like boxing, tennis, and volleyball. However, natural talent alone does not specifically mean success or mastery of a field. Success is determined by the talents an individual has, the amount of preparation and practice done, and the number of opportunities one is presented with.

Outliers Outliers is a story about how people become successful through various different theories, practices, and tests. I extremely enjoyed reading this story because it makes you want to change your actions in order to become successful. Outliers explains the various different methods and ways to achieve success. Whether that be the “10,000 hour practice rule” or the luck of a birth date, anyone can strive towards success. The story opens up about “The Matthew Effect” and why hockey players are born in the January, February and March months, while baseball players are born in the June and July Months.

Gladwell presents a strong argument for “concerted cultivation” in comparison to natural growth in his book Outliers. "The Trouble With Geniuses,” chapter two of Outliers He introduces us to new groups of “Outliers” which fall into the category of genius. In this essay I will define purpose, voice, audience and context used in the chapters describing the troubles related to geniuses.

Despite Gladwell’s many different theories of success, his claim that expertise comes with 10,000 hours of practice is not an accurate example of the complexity of success. Gladwell argues in Outliers that if everyone had the opportunity of time practicing, more people could become experts. Yet, the ‘10,000 Rule’ is not true from person to person. According to Dr. Fiona McQuarrie, 10,000 hours was only the average of the group that is considered to be experts, not necessarily the accumulated total of each person. One person can be an expert with less practice time than another. She states in her blog, “...the best violinist and the best pianists had accumulated an average of 7,410 hours and 7,606 hours of practice time respectively.” (McQuarrie)

In this article "Troublemakers", Gladwell focuses how social order frequently has a tendency will worsen overgeneralizations something like an issue that need influence their society, frequently likewise safety precautions to guarantee such pit bulls attack issues don’t happen. The particular issue that Gladwell focuses this bit of composing is the approval that might have been passed against pit bulls. This approval specified that pit bulls to be banned starting with the region of Ontario. This approval law went with claiming pit bulls assaulted a kid and his family, abandoning a large number of the individuals included in the hospitalized. “Troublemakers”, Gladwell examines what Pit bulls stereotypes educate in us around the wrongness for racial profiling from claiming both people and the pooches. Gladwell utilization this sample for overgeneralization also applies the enactment passed against pit bulls, pointing a crazy issue for overgeneralizing around the breeds from claiming puppies furthermore as a rule. Gladwell contends that settling on an overgeneralization of a dog’s breed also labeling them similarly as “dangerous” or a “monster” is not a reasonable representation. Gladwell recommends that not all pit bulls will kill mankind. There needs aid number issues from focusing on particular breeds as ‘dangerous’ instead, for example, targeting puppies exited from chains from backyards likewise continuously less averse to make hostility towards well-loved family unit