Glassers And Kounin's Model Of Classroom Discipline

The Assertive Discipline Model is a model that comes under the Management Theories. The two main theorises behind this model if discipline are Lee and Marlene Carter, the husband and wife duo have put thousands of hours research into helping perfect this model (Allen, 1996). They see the Assertive Discipline Model as being an approach that is direct and positive; it allows the teachers to teach and the students to be in an environment where they are able to lean to their best ability (Allen, 1996). The Carter’s model of Assertive Discipline relies on the teacher to punish unacceptable behaviour in a way in which will deter the child from repeating this behaviour again (Allen, 1996). A key point that Carter and Carter make in their model of Assertive Discipline is that the behaviour that is expected in the classroom is well known, there are warnings given to the students about their behaviour reminding them what is expected of them and then it is expected that the teacher following through with the consequence that adheres with the incorrect behaviour (Konza, Grainger & Bradshaw, 2001). Teachers using the Assertive Model will under no circumstances tolerate students that disrupt them the teacher, or other students from learning (Konza, Grainger & Bradshaw, 2001). The consequences for students that have misbehaved must be clear and concise so that the students themselves have a clear understanding of what the punishment is and what the behaviour is that

Are you a teacher, administrator, or school counselor struggling with discipline in your school? Do rules, power struggles, and stress invade your everyday life? In the classroom, does it seem like your needs do not matter? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then Curwin, Mendler, and Mendler’s classroom management book, “Discipline with Dignity: New Challenges, New Solutions” (2008), may be the tool for you.

In an interview, Harry Wong stated that, “The number one problem in the classroom is not discipline: it is the lack of procedures and routines,” (Wong). Harry and Rosemary Wong support a system of classroom management rather than classroom discipline. The Wong’s believe that students need to be “taught the roles, procedures, processes, and routines” that they are expected to follow (Charles, 116). When the “teacher explains the procedures of the classroom to the students, and the students turn the procedures into a routine,” then the teacher will have better control over the class with less discipline issues (Wong). For the Wong’s discipline philosophy, the teacher needs to have a script for the first day of class with everything that needs mentioned and completed. The students need to be greeted at the door by the teacher, bell work needs to be placed on all of the desks (even on the first day of school), and procedures and rules need to be taught, rehearsed, reinforced, and repeated (especially during the first two weeks of school). The students need no down time during class, by allowing down time, the teacher is allowing the students to misbehave. The students will follow directions when given, raise hand before speaking, and use kind words. The teacher will take role while all students are working on bell work so that it doesn’t take time from learning.

There are many different misbehaviors that a teacher may encounter from his or her students if an effective classroom management plan is not put in place at the beginning of a new school term or year. Canter’s assertive discipline is based mainly on fair rules and negative consequences (Ellis, David W. 1995). The implementation of an effective plan will cut down on off-task behaviors and will make way for more time to be spent on promotion of a stimulating learning environment. There are several behavior management plans from which educators can choose; the problem sometimes comes in choosing one that fits well with the students in the class. Additionally, educators have to remember that the same behavior management plan may not work from teacher to teacher, and better yet, the plan which is suitable for their first period class, may not work well with students in fourth period. After the narrowing down and tailoring process of finding a suitable plan to fit individual classroom needs, then the key to making sure it is a great classroom management plan is consistency which begins from the day the plan is implemented until the end of the school term.

First,Elearn Portal,(2016)post theKounin Mode theory of Jacob Kounin. He is recognized for two studies concerning classroom management in the 1970’s. These readings emphasized how teachers could manage students, lessons and classrooms to reduce the incidence of bad behaviour. This theorist acknowledged definite teaching techniques that help, and hinder, classroom discipline. Bestowing to Kounin, the method used, not the teacher’s personality, is the most crucial aspect in classroom management of student behaviour. The title of his book is Discipline and Group Management in Classrooms which centres on preventive discipline. He says that, good classroom management depends on operative lesson management. He also acknowledged a group of proactive

Students all have their own personalities, which affects their actions within the classroom. Many times, a students’ behavior is caused by outside factors causing them to act out with disruptive behaviors and disciplinary issues. During these times, a teacher must have a behavior management approach to deter similar behaviors in the future. Many first time teachers are unable to handle dealing with the behaviors and leave their jobs making it all the more important to come up with an effective behavior management approach to curtail those worrisome behaviors before it gets to that point (Sugai, 2009). In an effort to thoroughly discuss an efficient behavior management approach, a common disciplinary problem within classroom and the foundation of the issue will be considered. A combination of approaches may be to needed to stop behavioral issues, such as providing motivation and establishing rules and procedures in a clear way will deter behavioral issues. Finally, an in-depth look at the steps needed in order to implement the approach into the classroom.

Managing student’s behavior should be under classroom discipline and not classroom management. Behavioral management is defined as “preventing, suppressing, and redirecting misbehavior (Charles, 9).It is the misunderstanding between the two terms, which Wong believes that is the reason why many teachers struggle with classroom management, is that “teachers think classroom management means discipline. So what they do is they go into the classroom and put all their emphasis on discipline. They think classroom management is about crowd control or teaching kids to be quiet” (Wong). In order to establish proper behavior in a classroom I believe that understanding each student’s personality and learning style is important. Establishing just one discipline regime would cater to only certain students, whereas the other students may be seen a “misbehaving,” due to their

“The Lost art of Discipline” – by Kevin Donnelly Classroom management and discipline is crucial in creating an environment that is both productive and meaningful in the learning experience for students. In his article; “The Lost art of Discipline”, Kevin Donnelly explores the importance of changing the current nature of Australian classrooms in order to improve the present educational standards attained by Australian school students, quite regularly he refers to two major sources – the OECD’s study and the 1997 report produced by the Australian Council for Educational Research to strengthen his argument. The article explores three significant areas; the lack of discipline within the Australian schooling system, the effect this is having on

Teachers have the ability to set up classroom rules to help maintain the structure with behaviors in the classroom. Bill Rogers, affectionately know as Mr. Rogers, has many effective techniques and approaches to classroom management, from prevention and positive correction to consequences. He does not advocate being a strict, disciplinarian, authoritarian teacher, but gives strategies to help teachers work with students to control their own behavior. The first part of Rogers’ plan gives techniques used to prevent discipline problems (Education World, 2003). As he discusses rights of the students, he talks about how they have the right to feel safe, be treated with dignity and respect and have the right to learn.

Classroom management gives teachers a responsibility in establishing and maintain a classroom environment that students will engage and remain focused on their learning. The topic chosen to analyze the perspectives of both teachers and educational psychologists is class discipline. Discipline focuses on teaching student’s to understand that their negative behaviors and actions have consequences. The interview took place with a pre- kindergarten teacher Martha Melchor from Dalton Elementary in Uvalde, Texas. There are various suggestions educational psychologists provide teachers techniques in areas in which to handle misbehavior. While gathering information from the interview and textbook, the perspective on discipline between teachers and

ADVISE ON EFFECTIVE WAYS OF IMPROVING CLASS DISCIPLINE AND LEARNER’S PERFOMANCE AT RABONNI CHRISTIAN SCHOOL,BRITS (MADIBENG DISTRICT). INTRODUCTION Rabboni Christian School (my school) should provide students with the educational foundation to build successful, independent lives. Classroom disruptions interfere with student achievement. Teachers must maintain discipline to create an effective learning environment. A combination of methods used in a consistent and fair manner typically offers the best approach to classroom discipline. Discpline is providing an environment in which positive teaching and positive learning can occur simultaneously. Discipline is not control from the outside; its order from within. BODY Teachers at my school should have a holistic approach in addressing discipline and learner performance. This can be achieved as a

To develop this artifact I followed the classroom management theories raised by Linda Albert, Frederic Jones, and Jacob Kounin. Whereas I implemented in my classroom Linda’s Cooperative Discipline model when I chose to work cooperatively with my students to develop a set of consequences to be invoked when the classroom code of conduct is transgressed. Consequently, students are more likely to accept them as fair and reasonable. I have also based my plan in the positive discipline model of Jones by rewarding my students for their appropriate behavior and effectively using a body language that includes eye contact, physical proximity, body carriage, facial expressions, and gestures. I also followed Kounin’s preventive discipline theory about

The aim of classroom management is to establish and maintain a positive, productive learning environment that provides effective learning opportunities for its students. Therefore, it is crucial for beginning teachers to understand the varying approaches to classroom management and their theoretical underpinnings. Effective classroom management is an essential skill for any new teacher, unfortunately many teachers will adopt traditional or authoritarian approaches rather than innovative evidence-based strategies (Fry, 2007). Additionally, a teacher’s beliefs, attitudes and values will often determine their classroom management strategy (Lyons, Ford & Slee, 2014) and whether they adopt a single theory, a combination of elements across multiple theories or continually adapt to their classroom environment. Here, three classroom management approaches will be analysed; Goal Centered Theory, Cognitive Behavioural Theory and Assertive Discipline.

Classroom management and classroom discipline share a correlation with one another yet; they are uniquely different issues and should remain a separate focus of the teacher. (Cantor, 2006) Behavior and misbehavior also share a connection but represent different degrees of infraction. (Charles, 2008) This essay focuses on the differences and similarities of these topics and their relation to the classroom.

Lee Canter’s assertive discipline model is likely most often used in classrooms where the teacher operates under a legitimate authority base. While studies show that students learn best in classrooms where teachers display efferent or expert authority bases, I believe that there is some definite value in using a legitimate authority base when it comes to class discipline and management. The assertive discipline model encourages teachers to be proactive and anticipate that students will break the rules (Canter, ) Another main focus of Canter’s model is using assertive command, which means the teacher does not retreat to a nonassertive passive stance or to a hostile response when students misbehave, but rather repeats the rule to the student over and over before making a corrective action. I believe that using assertive command in the classroom allows students the chance to correct their actions and think