Gleim Study Unit 4 Multiple Choice

2. What procedures can auditors perform to detect fraudulent entries made during the consolidation process?

Our project team analyzed the Fraud and Illegal Acts Case (True blood Case Studies- Case 08-9), which involves a questionable sales transaction made between Jersey Johnnie’s Surfboard, an SEC registrant, and Mr. Sinaloa, an independent sales representative of the company. As a simplified overview of the case, an external audit firm was hired on to perform a year-end audit of Jersey Johnnie’s Surfboards, Inc. Towards the end of the audit, the engagement partner notified the auditors that there could be a possibility of fraud and illegal acts made by the company.

4. Additional testing may still be required even if the error is corrected by the client. Many other errors during the month of April could have occurred on the accounting clerk’s watch that the auditor needs to do further testing to be sure no material misstatements are present. Some of these testing could be seeing what other duties the accounting clerk had during that month. Checking the client’s internal control for the entire entity could also be necessary to ensure that controls are in place for training employees that may need to fill the roles of a peer.

Identify the accounts that you would test, and select at least three (3) analytical procedures that you would use in your audit.

1a) What should the auditor consider when determining whether an account should be considered significant?

c. That being said, it was auditors and accountants who discovered the illegal actions which were occouring in each of these respective scandals.

4. The auditors have the responsibility to search for related-party transactions because of materiality. AU 334 & AS 18 gives a standard for related parties that auditors have to perform during an audit. One way to search for related parties is to examine the transactions between different parties and trace to locate the customers and or suppliers. Another way to locate related parties is money that comes into the business from lenders and or borrowers. Audit procedures that should be applied by discussing with the BOD of any transactions that may be related, examine closely each account and to audit intercompany accounts.

Imagine trusting your hard-earned money like your retirement savings to a financial adviser or Certified Public Accountants (CPA) only to lose it all in a fraudulent Ponzi scheme. In today’s world of business many organizations, financial planners and accountants are in the news due to the financial ethical breaches that have affected their customers, employees, and the general public. A CPA has to be responsible for their audits and take any punishments as a result of their mistakes, incompetence or illegal actions. CPAs are expected to have integrity in their work,

The auditing firm has been in engagement with the company throughout the period when the fraud was being committed. One of the common and clear indicators of possible fraud was the company’s cash flow statement. The company experienced positive growth in its profits from the year 1996 through to the year 1998. However, a close analysis of the cash flow statement shows that the company had experienced negative figures of cash flow from both operating and investing activities and positive cash flow from financing activities which would not sufficiently offset the negative cash flows from operating and investing. It is therefore evident

d. “The auditor's reliance on substantive tests to achieve an audit objective related to a particular assertion may be derived from tests of details, from analytical procedures, or from a combination of both. The decision about which procedure or procedures to use to achieve a particular audit objective is based on the auditor's judgment on the expected effectiveness and efficiency of the available procedures. For significant risks of material misstatement, it is unlikely that audit evidence obtained from substantive analytical procedures alone will be sufficient (PCAOB, AS 2305.09).”

3. A) If I were put in this situation as an equity investor, I would absolutely pursue legal actions against the auditors. If there was a

d. Not independent and, therefore, may issue a review report, but may not issue an auditor 's opinion.

3. What potential implications arise for the accounting firm if they issue an unqualified report without the going-concern explanatory paragraph?

Auditors having the appropriate competence and capabilities to perform the audit, and follow ethical requirements, and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.

As a new auditor for the CPA firm of Croix, Marais, and Kale, you have been assigned to review the internal controls over mail cash receipts of Manhattan Company. Your review reviews the following: checks are promptly endorsed “For Deposits Only”, but no list of the checks is prepared by the person opening the mail. The mail is opened either by the cashier or by the employee who maintains the accounts receivable records. Mail receipts are deposited in the bank weekly by the cashier.