Global Views Of Privacy Paper Essay

John Locke’s idea of Natural Rights created a whole new aspect of how the government should be constructed. Natural Rights is the freedoms people are born with and should be protected by the government, if not then the citizens have the right to overthrow the government since their rights are not being preserved. This Enlightenment ideal is an important aspect in both today’s world and during revolutionary periods

This paper is about John Locke who was a philosopher in the 17-century. He was an Englishmen and his ideas formed the basic concept for the government and laws, which later allowed colonist to justify revolution. I agree with what Locke is saying because everybody should be able to have their own freedom and still respect the freedom of other people. John said, “Individuals have rights, and their duties are defined in terms of protecting their own rights and respecting those of others”. This paper will present to you information about his enlightenment, personal information, and how we as people feel about his decisions.

Mankind has been fighting for Liberty and Freedom for as long as we can remember. Liberty and freedom has been a topic which has been debated for many decades. What does it mean to be free , and how far can we go to strive for freedom. These important questions have been answered and studied by two of the greatest English philosophers, John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Locke and Mill men will attempt to uncover the mysteries of Liberty and Freedom and unveil the importance of being free. This essay will look at John Locke’s principle works” Second Treatise of government” and John Stuart Mills. “ On Liberty and Other Essays”. This essay will attempt to compare and contrast Lockes ideology on Liberty and Freedom to that of Mill.

CD: In his Second Treatise on Government, published in 1689, Locke discusses the natural human state as free, unregulated, and that “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions”. (BOOK)

The shared passion of visionaries, thinkers, and writers profoundly influence society in the modern world and hold in their hands the ability to craft a better future. They inspire new ,, and sometimes even revolution. Two documents of the 18th century, The Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights of man established and angle for which we view human rights, liberties, and human freedoms. While the underlying motivations of the declarations each have a distinct purpose, the intent to establish universal human rights parallel and often mimic one another in language and meaning. Both documents however have interesting contradictions and inconsistences with regards to whom the liberties should apply, from whom the authority is derived and the motivations behind the drafting of each respective declaration.

For most of human history people have been debating what is the appropriate nature of the relationship between the individual and society. Starting with the ancient Greek, most people thought that individuals should be subordinate to society. In the publication The Second Treatise of Government, John Locke was the first to promote individualism over society. Though his ideas were considered as liberal, now are embraced by many conservative. John Locke’s ideas are the basis of the American government and so it is important to keep America 's nature; the rights of life, liberty to own property, and the pursuit of happiness; at heart when creating laws.

It is also relevant to point out that under Locke’s theory all men are created equal in the sense that we all are entitled to these rights (life, liberty, and property), and this is also the case with the rights of the Declaration of Independence (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness). Because humans are born with these universal rights, Locke argued that a universal standard of morality was present even during the “State of Nature”.

John Locke published “Two Treatise [essays] of Government” in 1689. In these tow documents Locke proposed that every person had the rights of life, liberty and property. The government cannot take these unalienable rights away unless they have a reason. Locke also stated that the

Locke, they claim, only recognizes natural law obligations in those situations where our own preservation is not in conflict, further emphasizing that our right to preserve ourselves trumps any duties we may have (Tuckness, 2012). For example, based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Right, it is clearly stated that ‘a qualified right and as such the right to a private and family life and respect for the home and correspondence may be limited, in which while the right to privacy is engaged in a wide number of situations, the right may be lawfully limited’ (Liberty, 2015). This limitations is actually in regard of assurance of the equal balance between the involved parties without discriminating one another because we, at the end of the day, has to be congruent with the existing legitimate laws in order to maintain the strength of our government. Moreover, this limitation helps in leading the increase of the interest in national security and also public safety. Furthermore, the betterment of our government will also aid the economy sector, the public unity, which then causes the good upbringing of the rights and freedom of others. Plus, liberty has to be limited in order to be inclined for the balancing rights; in which we construct our relationships by having an understanding with the other by carefully constructing agreements because if the balancing is unstable,

John Locke’s writing is influential with the creation of the government that the United States abides by. The natural rights that he preached showed that everyone had basic inalienable rights such as life, liberty, and property(though ratified to happiness). As shown in the constitution in the form of the Bill of Rights, the ten rights guaranteed to

As Americans, many of us have heard of the saying, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” (Graham). It is easy to take for granted (many of us have no idea that John Locke is credited for this idea) but most of the world does not share this simple but powerful philosophy. However, to an English nation in chaos between their Parliament and their monarch, Locke’s philosophies created a balance that would have both sides becoming winners and set the stage for human rights as well as the capability of a tiny island to become a dominant world power.

In the modern world, sovereign states are commonplace, with each nation having control over its own territory and citizens. The concept of states traces back to the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which brought about exclusive sovereignty of each separate state over its territory and citizens. With the creation of autonomous nations, early modern philosophers such as Hobbes and Locke began to contemplate the role of human nature and the state. According to these two theorists, the fashion in which the rulers are formed, and how they subsequently treat the ruled depends largely on the nature of the ruled themselves. Locke believes in the peaceful disposition of human nature, and the formation of the state as a means to instill a sense of justice within

The original Social Contract tradition has had many authors, but for the purposes of this paper I will focus on John Locke’s work as one political system that might be used by a nation and the problems it entails that would have to be discussed for modern uses. Locke begins by describing a state of nature that entails equality and a state of perfect freedom for mankind to live as they want within the laws of nature (Locke 2009, 370). Locke’s work argues for his view of property, where a man has the right to the fruits of his labor but not to another man’s (Locke 2009, 372). In his view, the government is meant to prevent on man from seeking punishment that is unfit for the committed crime and that people join together for protection for themselves and their property (Locke 2009, 371-372). He argues also that no one man should be in charge and that a democracy should be used instead (Locke 2009, 371).

John Locke (1632-1704) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) are two important thinkers of liberty in modern political thought. They have revolutionized the idea of human freedom at their time and have influenced many political thinkers afterwards. Although their important book on human freedom, John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government (1689) and John Mill’s On Liberty (1859), are separated 170 years, some scholars thinks that they are belonging to the same conceptual tradition, English Liberalism. In this essay, I will elaborate John Locke and John Stuart Mill view on human freedom and try to find the difference between their concept of human freedom despite their similar liberal tradition background.

Every individual has a right to retain the information of their own tax, medical and other government related documents and this highly sensitive and personalized information is not revealed by the hospitals/doctors, financial institutions, business parties or the government agencies to irrelevant third parties. The Capitalistic societies are trading with the personal data as a saleable commodity (Jan, 2005), resulting in the privacy and free market policies being at odds with each other. Advanced data management technologies have resulted in sophisticated “Consumer database and management systems” which in turn has become a fast growing and highly profitable business activity by itself. Data stored digitally has an indefinite span of life; because of which, consumers are apprehensive about their personal information being shared with unintended third parties (Warren & Brandies, 1890). In the present day context, the “rights to privacy” is directly conflicting with the “freedom or the right to information” being implemented by various democratic societies (Udo, 2001).