Edmund Contoski Global Warming Global Myth Summary

Global warming is a constant topic that is frequently discussed throughout the world. Many people including environmentalist, study this topic to determine the seriousness and world impact. The typical understanding of this concept “global warming” is known to be the total long-term intensification in the temperature present in the atmosphere (3). When discussing this topic, it is still important to consider the fact if Global Warming is actually fact or fiction. In order to evaluate this controversial issue, one would need to discuss evidence for or against the idea of global warming. To further discuss this topic, one should evaluate valid sources that can support one’s conclusions.

In modern America few problems prove to be as fundamentally problematic as the theory of human induced global warming. Its repeated coverage from within the media and political arena are influencing people worldwide, putting those who think differently in an outcast shadow. The truth of the matter is, to not believe in human induced global warming has become politically incorrect and unacceptable in the public eye. The theory of human induced global warming can be defined as the rise in temperature through human pollution of greenhouse gases resulting in catastrophic alterations in the earth 's environment. However, human pollution of greenhouse gases is so minor that it is not a contribution to the

Beginning with Mark Hendrickson’s argument, he recognizes that the climate is changing. He wrote in his article “Climate Change-Hoax or Crime of the Century” that the Earth has emerged from a Little Ice Age not that long ago, and it would be worrisome if the climate around the globe was not warming

Since 1975, the surface of the earth 's average temperature has risen by 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit; global warming caused by greenhouse effect has become the focus topic of the world. It has long been recognized academically that due to the burning of coal, oil, natural gas and so on the carbon dioxide is the main culprit of global warming. I watched a documentary, which called “The Great Global Warming Swindle.” In the documentary, the scientists pointed out that there is no direct evidence that carbon dioxide is the cause of global warming, global warming is more of propaganda, a kind of political activity. Normally, as an amateur people, should write this article emphasizes their neutrality, but actually, I agree with BBC.

There have been plenty of disputes regarding the infamous topic global warming, despite the fact that there is a unanimous scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. A history professor at UCSD, Naomi Oreskes, discusses this in her article, “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change”. She begins her investigation by researching credible experts and environmental organizations, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences, and several others. By utilizing these various sources as evidence it strengthens her argument about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. In this case, Oreskes audience consists of

Global warming is one of the most controversial topics in the world today. Global warming describes a condition where the average temperature of the earth’s atmosphere and oceans increase. Global warming is predicted to have significant harmful effects on life on earth. The controversy arises from conflicting evidence in the scientific community as to whether humans are contributing to global warming, whether it is a result of natural forces that are beyond the control of humans, or in some cases, whether it is even occurring at all. This research will examine credible evidence of global warming and will explore its causes and

Edmund Contoski wrote the article “Global Warming, Global Myth.” Global warming is in fact a myth that has been created by liberalist and is no different than the red scare that has occurred in the past, a supposed problem blown out of proportion by the mainstream media networks. As stated before the Earth goes through natural warming and cooling trends, one of these trends known as El Niño, which is a change in currents in the Pacific Ocean, which increase the temperature. Mankind the supposed source for all of our Earth’s climate problems does not even contribute 5% of the total carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is one of the main gases in the evil world-ending group known as greenhouse gases. In actuality, humans only produce about 3% of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leaving the other 97% percent to nature. Some of the worst offenders are not cars or factories, not even leaving the lights on in your house but in fact is the wetlands; yes the wetlands. The very same wetlands that have earned multiple groups begging for their protection because they are environmentally necessary are producing more greenhouse gases than all human activities combined. Termites are also bad for the environment, not for the fact that they destroy your home but the fact that they produce ten times more carbon dioxide then factories and automobiles. Volcanoes and Yellow Stone National Park also add to these totals. However, with all of the talk about

The media always blows up issues to be dynamite when they are really just pop-its. The media likes to make things more dramatic than they actually are, and they will make a big deal out of a small situation, for example, global warming. The media enjoys to portray global warming like the Earth is going to blow up in a few months. Global warming is not a major issue right now because it does not affect human lives, the average temperature has not been significantly changing, and predictions about the impact of global warming have been proven wrong by professionals.

The Long Thaw by David Archer discusses what has been a topic of great debate during the last couple of years: global warming. He begins by explaining the fundamental cause of global warming—the greenhouse effect, something we have all heard plenty about but haven’t really understood. Archer presents his ideas in a way that educates us all on the topic by delineating the sequential history of this issue which has been a topic of discussion since the 19th century. By providing a sound explanation on what causes global warming and what it will mean for the future, I feel I learned a great deal about this oh so important issue which affects us all as a planet. One thing Archer points out is how relatively new global warming is to us, and this is because we’ve had such

The idea that climate change and global warming are hoaxes is quite possibly the most dangerous thing facing the world. Without acceptance and action, the problem and negative practices of several regions will only exasperate the already to real problem; the world’s climate is changing at an insurmountable rate, and it will take a global effort to reverse or even slow

The author is questioning the connection between the obligation a state holds to protect the livelihood and property of its citizens, and whether denying to “address” climate change makes them liable for the negative effects it has on their citizens. If refusal to mediate climate change, on an international level, constitute as neglect of state duty when climate change has a direct impact on people’s lives. The rights issue is lies between the right to state sovereignty and the rights of individuals to protection and well-being.

In global warming, %82 of greenhouse gases is from carbon dioxide human activities. Human activities are changing the carbon cycle by… adding more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The main human activity that emits carbon dioxide is the combustion of fossil fuels for energy and transportation. Also some companies have contributed to the help on global warming, by using technology that stops carbon dioxide emissions. The Inconvenient Truth explains that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and this climate crisis.

Thesis Statement: Global warming is a growing concern of scientists and researchers who believe that it is a serious problem for our planet. The concerns and research have also been questioned and have even been called myths. Millions of people find themselves affected by these weather pattern changes and are concerned for their futures. Activists on both sides of the argument are very passionate and not afraid to attack each other in every way they can. There are many questions that are still not answered, however, we continue to see drastic weather changes to Earth. We must go beyond the arguments and learn as much as we can to stop what could possibly lead to the destruction of our planet, our way of life and our future.

The discovery of ice ages on earth began the insertion of anomalies within the community. As Weart exclaimed, “it was not the vague possibility of global warming that intrigued the few people who thought about climate change, but the stupendous advance and retreat of continental ice sheets” (11). By attempting to solve the puzzle of the how and why the ice sheets expanded and retreated over time scientists stumbled upon anomalies that did not fit within the existing rules of how the climate operates. Attempts to understand included theories on shifting platonic plate, volcanic eruptions blocking the sun, the turnover rate of the oceans ability to absorb heat from the sun to the anthropogenic effects of deforestation. Eventually all lead to test and experiments that still resulted in the current paradigm thinking. That whatever the forces are that can manipulate the climate have to be greater than any forces we, as humans, can impart to the environment (Weart).

When one encounters the concept and idea of global warming, we inquire a wide range of opinions, facts, assumptions, and philosophies. As the general population of the world, the idea