Globalization Is The Fight Against The Things We Don 't Say It Is Necessary

When it comes to globalization, everyone may have a different vision of it’s outcome. For Marcelo Gleiser, the author of “Globalization: Two visions of the Future of Humanity”, a completely globalized world may result in a dystopia. In contrast, Jeffrey Wasserstrom, the author of “A Mickey Mouse Approach to Globalization” and Tanveer Ali, the creator of “The Subway Falafel Sandwich and the Americanization of Ethnic Food” may think of globalization as other cultures sharing each other’s components to interact on a new level and spurring a more “open-minded” (Ali 27) individual.

Hundreds of protesters were beaten and the crowd was tear- gassed. After the riot seven men were held responsible for the riots and imprisoned for their action and for not caring out peaceful assembly. (Whitney)

One activist who took dramatic measures was Rosa Parks. She was the one who started the Montgomery bus boycott in the us and protested for black rights. She was born

Counterhegemonic globalization is “a type of social movement that fundamentally challenges and, in rare circumstances, produces changes and alters the dimensions of the contemporary political or economic order” (Gillies, Counterhegemonic Globalization and the Decline of the Record Industry, pg.2). Essentially what this means is that it is a way of showing distaste for how a system is set up in many parts of the world (often due to the penalties that are more often than not given to the lower class in these cases), and expressing said distaste through attempting to change it. This can obviously cause problems for government and corporations, especially corporations that have a monopoly on a certain business sector, for example Wall Street has a monopoly on stock markets. Counterhegemonic globalization

Garbage littering the streats, buildings slowly withering away in flames, glass shattered everywhere while smoke turns the sky black, as city officials try to put together the pieces of whats left of their city. All this is a classic scene of the aftermath after a protest. While having the right to freedom of speech, and the ability to express them openly, there is still a right and wrong way to do so. Protesting is the least effictive and most harmful. Although many argue that protesting is manageable and proffiecent, protests casue more issues than bennifets because they hurt people and property, send bad messages to the communities and waste people's time and resources.

The officer’s actions created major issues for the community. According to the text, after the appearance in City Hall was unsuccessful, the group then turned into “about 1000 protestors who marched to a nearby police headquarter, and around midnight police in riot gear fired tear gas and metal pellet filled bean bag ammunition from the headquarters’ entrance.” (Ritscher pg 2).

A few protesters wore masks and threw rocks at the police. The police then used tear gas to bring them under control and detained some of the rioters.

The novel, The Shock Doctrine, by Naomi Klein consists twenty one chapters divided into seven parts. The novel also includes an introduction and a conclusion. The author could have potentially chosen this topic because she was curious of the correlation between original shock therapy and Milton Friedman’s economic shock theory. The topic, indefinitely interested Klein, as she felt the inclination to conduct further research and see where Friedman’s theory had actually taken place within the world. Her research came up successful, with her finding numerous cases, which were outlined in her book, where economic shock theory has been applied to Poland, South Africa, and Russia during the 1997 financial crisis.

Video: 40 minutes Video on an idea of Naomi Klein, No Logo- Brands, Globalisation and Resistance (2003), directed by Sut Jhally.

The documentary, diseases how the globalisations measures could ruin the world or create a better stable environment, helping in managing many areas, for example, local economy thrive. That will lead to a better outcome. in societies.

is essentially nothing that can be done to stop it. According to this view, technological changes have propelled international economic activity, and governments have been largely irrelevant. Thus, policy liberalization should be

Globalization is the proximate and multidimensional set of political, economic, social, and technological integration around the globe. The increasing interconnectedness among countries can be seen through the prism of globalization. Essentially, the lives of people living in distant cities like Bangalore and Silicon Valley are brought closer as a result of this phenomenon. Drivers of this adjacent include; the expansion of trade, technological exchange, labor movement and investments (Stearns 2017). The discourse of globalization encompasses several multidisciplinary themes. The paper, however, concentrates on the economic factors, “which, entails the closer economic integration of countries of the world through increased flow of goods, services, capital and even labor.” (Stiglitz 2007: 4). The paper focuses on economic globalization and elucidates whether the globalization has reduced poverty and inequality or had reproduced the reversed implications. Meanwhile, the paper reveals if the developing world has benefited from the set. This seems to be the central question that policymakers, development economists, and politicians have been grappling with for years. The paper is presented in three parts. Part one reflects on the historical context of the problem statement. The second part compiles literature and juxtaposes with cases to corroborate the globalization-poverty-inequality triangle. Finally, the conclusion represents the author’s viewpoint on the

Globalization, which is the process of nations, group, and organizations spreading their influence internationally, affects every citizen of the modern world daily. Without realizing it consumers contribute to economic globalization by purchasing products from transnational corporations, every single day. The source takes an opinion against globalization, specifically economic globalization. Which is the interdependence that economies across the world rely on each other to continue and prosper. These economies rely on each other, because countries buy, and trade products that they can not produce, with those that can. The sources main point against economic globalization is that it is not sustainable. This means that economic

To most of us, globalization—as a political, economic, social, and technological force—appears all but unstoppable. The ever-faster flow of information across the globe has made people aware of the tastes, preferences, and lifestyles of citizens in other countries. Through this information flow, we are all becoming—at varying speeds and at least in economic terms—global citizens. This convergence is controversial, even offensive, to some who consider globalization a threat to their identity and way of life. It is not surprising; therefore, that globalization has evoked counter forces aimed at preserving differences and deepening a sense of local identity.

In the modern world, globalization has become an irresistible trend. Globalization exists in different forms in ordinary life, such as the desire to learn languages to connect with friends internationally, or the imported products with the best quality at a lower cost. However, Jimmy Carter emphasized, “Globalization, as defined by rich people like us, is a very nice thing... you are talking about the Internet, you are talking about cell phones, you are talking about computers. This doesn 't affect two-thirds of the people of the world.” Carter suggested an idea that inspired me to look further into the nature of globalization, which is that we are seeing mostly the surfaces of the phenomenon, or the formal consequences that globalization brings about. Nonetheless, the formal consequences are not affecting “two thirds of the people of the world.” I’m taking about the some elements of the economy, which are shadow and illegal, but are affecting directly the most vulnerable and weak human groups - women and children. The negative components of the shadow economy might be modern forms of slavery, human trafficking, forced labor and racial discrimination. In this paper, I will explore how globalization has diversified the nature of the economy and how it has its positive and negative consequences, using different tools and approaches such as human rights, religions, legislations, languages, cultural transmissions and politics.