Globalization: The Road to Worldwide Peace and Prosperity Essay

According to the hegemonic stability theory, “a hegemonic power is necessary to support a highly integrated world economy.” (Nau 2007, 280) Nau explains that as long as there is a relative distribution of power, no one power can affect the system as a whole (280). When there are several equally competitive countries, the global economy reaches the model of a perfect market. Each state acts according to their self-interest, and such behavior leads to higher gains for everyone because “competition maximizes efficiency” (Nau 2007, 280) in a perfect market. However, there is no place for violence in a perfect market because a hegemon assures security by deploying a police force (Nau 2007, 280). Since there is usually no such force in the international system, many competitive nations have to fear violence. This is what the realists meant when they stated that in the multipolar world, nations cannot be sure about alliances. In addition, the United States and the Soviet Union were the two great powers after World War II; thus, they developed an example of a bipolar world, in which there are separate and self-governing “half-world” economies that includes very little trade with each other (Nau 2007, 280).

With globalization there is reduced state autonomy. Multi-nationals have a lot of say in matters to do with the government and other concerned state agencies. Organizations like the World Bank, World Trade Organization have direct link to settlement of government to government disputes and has enabled international political and economic tension to be settled in an amicable manner. This has lead to a strengthened peace for many countries in the international arena. This has lead to a reduced breeding ground for terrorist activities in the global world.

Individual Identity: Every year my family tries to take a trip back to China in order to see family. On trip back played a big role in shaping my identity. In the summer of 2012 I had the daunting task of travelling alone China. This consisted of mastering the Chinese phrases needed to guide me along the way and some way of figuring out how to transfer flights. Surprisingly the hardest part was not finding my way it was merely being alone I found that I got very lonely in the long 14 hour trip and I needed to find a way to occupy myself in order to avoid loneliness. The things I learned from being lonely help form my identity. I found that the more I tried to push away the loneliness the more it just came

In theory, globalization should help contribute to the equality of the global economy. Yet this is not the case in reality. Globalization contributes to unsustainable prosperity for a very small percentage of the world’s population. For those in developing countries, it is especially unsustainable. The resources in these areas are consumed at an unstable rate and the environment given very little consideration. The workers are treated as if they are expendable. The smaller economies of these countries are vastly taken advantage of. For these reasons, globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity to a small extent.

In Thomas L. Friedman’s “Globalization: The Super-Story”, he examines the features of globalization from various aspects and how it helps people better understand 9/11 events. He claims that globalization is the new improved system formed in place of the old “cold war system”(102), and through the patterns of which, people observe today’s world in an integrated way. Simple short phrases, organized structure, colloquial language, and punctuation are techniques Friedman uses to create a reader-friendly, convincing essay. To begin with, Friedman uses simple short phrases to emphasize his points. He starts with an enthusiastic term “big believer” (102), which establishes the colloquial

We live in a world that is constantly evolving to include more and more human interaction. A world that is quickly becoming more globalized and while that prospect excites me, it also fills me with a slight sense of dread. Dread because what if we can’t get along, work together and strive for better for the entire population then what good will globalization be?

Buzzwords such as globalization and terrorism have dominated political rhetoric for the past quarter-century. Assessing the benefits that come with globalization — namely, the disbursement of free trade, democratic values, cultural and informational intermingling, etc. — one would expect an increased quality of life across the board. Yet it appears that inequality and bloodshed has only aggrandized as a result of this worldwide integration of goods and ideas. Rather than fostering a universal understanding of humanity amongst nations and their imagined communities, globalization seems to have exacerbated primitive fears about the unknown — “the others”. Minorities have become further systematically marginalized by those in power (the elite), and political and cultural violence, both literal and symbolic, is at its prime.

Globalization is a process which involves the establishment of economic, cultural, and socio-economic relations between nations around the world. It is a concept that has fascinated me for quite some time because of it’s influence on topics such as; why one country gains while another loses, why certain people thrive while others diminish, how technology impacts human labor and workforce, etc. Specifically, I have always been drawn to the economic consequences of globalization and how they impact the United States and our relations with other nations. After extensive research, I have concluded that globalization can drastically improve the American economy `only when it is properly monitored and subjected to barriers. These barriers restrict the overall role it has played in the past and the role it will play in the future regarding the success of our economy.

Integration encourages a stable international arena by developing state economies and encouraging foreign trade. Karl Deutsch, a political scientist, states, “Integration means that a ‘sense of community’ has been achieved; people have come to agree that their conflicts and problems can be resolved ‘without resort to large-scale physical force’” (Jackson and Sørensen 103). The transnational ties lead to a secure community, which means a group of people have become integrated. Once integration is reached and the sense of community is formed, that group of people can handle the conflict and problems on their own rather than needing a lot of outside help to resolve the issue. This allows for, “Interdependency and collaboration transfer loyalty from the state to the transnational organization leading to economic interdependency” (Class notes 9/28). Since one state has economic interests in another state it facilitates greater trust and cooperation because that one state would not go to war with the other state

An increase in technology as well as rising globalization has brought the world closer together in a way, and this has created a need for states to become more interdependent of one another. For example, an economic decline in China could have negative impact on the economy of North American countries. In the same way, a communist revolution in one country could result in communist revolutions in neighboring countries as well. The point is that since countries are now so closely connected to one another, international organizations are needed in order to maintain rules and

After World War Two, many Americans, not just the ones in leadership positions, came to realize that partnerships with other cultures, countries, and peoples were very important in coping with daily life. To some, it would seem reasonable to infer that globalization has done more harm than good, while others might say that it has done more good. Regardless, it has brought many countries, including the United States, together; forming strong bonds, and even more importantly, it has helped to create peace in a world at war (chap. 32, Brinkley).

A globalized world is created by the growth and advancements made throughout history. This involves different government and nations working together to advance trade and investment. The world has not reached its full globalized potential, but if they did it would create advantages and disadvantages within social, economic, and political aspects. The best way to have a globalized world is through democracy.

‘Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what)’, portrays the speed in which globalism has increased through many different factors; economically, military, environmentally and socially. This is an idealist analytic approach, not set in stone. This leads on to

Globalization is an undeniable reality of the modern world. That said globalization means different things to different people. The debate about globalization is particularly complex because of the wide variety of ways that globalization affects people. Everyone has a stake in globalization, but some have more power to affect the system than others, Rebecca Todd Peters, in her book In Search of the Good Life, attempts to clarify the debate about globalization by identifying the 4 main viewpoints that exist. She identifies the dominant theories of globalization as neoliberalism and social equity liberalism. The to resistance theories, she characterizes as, earthism and post-colonialism. All the theories have specific proponents, historical contexts, ideologies, and goals for an ideal form of globalization. The goals of Peters’ book are to describe, critique, and provide her normative analysis of each model. She analyzes each model based on their idea of the ‘good life.’ She does this by asking three questions: “What is the position’s understanding of moral agency? ”, “What is humanities purpose –our end, or Telos? ”, and “What constitutes human flourishing?” (Pp. 22). Peters develops her normative analysis by providing answers to these questions based on her perspective and moral values.

In the modern world the economic structure is believed to help lead to peace and prosperity to all nations. It is stated that though Interdependent economies, when economies become dependent upon trade from foreign nations, and Globalization, the act in which nations begin to integrate their ideas and concepts with one another, war and conflict can be mitigated. War is mitigated through the two phenomena due to the growing trade between nations that demands for nations to agree and play nicely with one another in order to continue this trade. This is additionally seen through the effects that a lack of trade causes on the nations. But conflicts do not seem to be effected in a meaningful way by the two phenomena. This is due to the broad definition of conflicts that seems to encompass too many things to be completely affected and the nature of conflict which is always possible with two separate groups. Thus the modern world’s economy with its Interdependence and Globalization is able to create peace but is unable to end conflict.