preview

Glomerular Filtration Rate and Chronic Kidney Disease Management

Better Essays

The strengths of the study were the educational topics of the importance of eGFR and CKD management. The fact that this study showed that there was indeed a continuation of late referrals to the nephrologists could help further problems. The staging principals and risks discussed were also important. Another strength was the fact that a pre and post survey was conducted; with the education in between the surveys. The weakness of the studies education was the lack of actual case studies and the PCPs thought that nephrologists not peers should teach the lectures. The ability of the PCPs to attend both the supper and lunch was a weakness. Another weakness of the research was the fact that it didn’t discuss all of the questions that were on …show more content…

Another 87 residents would seek consult for this indication of < 15 ml/min/1.73m2. This proves that more education is needed for internal medicine residents. Residents were given two clinical vignettes on complications of CKD, anemia and bone mineral disorder of CKD stage III (GFR 30-59mL/min/1.72m2). Appoximately 134 residents (28.0%) would refer to the nephrologists for management of CKD, 134 residents (28.0%)and for bone mineral disorder by 215 residents (44.9%)(Babos, et al., 2009). Approximately half 281 (58.8%) of the residents would consider referral for a patient with a GFR of 15-30mL/min/1.73m2. Another 87 residents (18.2%) would consult a nephrologists for this indication at a GFR <15mL/min/1.73m2. Critique: strength and weakness The strengths of this research article is the fact that it proves that the lack of education is there for internal medicine residents, there has to be lack of this education for NPs. It also proved that the KDOQI guidelines are unknown among many health care professionals. The option to quickly complete the survey was strength to this research. A weakness is that there is no data on the non-respondents. The lack of referral could not be determined if it was from lack of education or the competence of CKD. The survey was not given to physicians, which could have established a level of performance. The experience of CKD was not obtained. The survey was also

Get Access