Gmo Essay

Despite the popular unfavorable side of GMOs, little to be known there could be a good side. Many farmers, scientists, and consumers say GMOs are helpful. Crops that are genetically engineered to fight diseases are saving not only the foods we love, but industries that grow them (Food Dialogues). With GMOs less water or pesticides are needed to grow food on less land. Scientists are working on a variety of genetically modifies seeds to create a hypoallergenic

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) proposes that a myriad of health problems including infertility, immune system problems, accelerated aging, disruption of insulin and cholesterol regulation, gastrointestinal problems, and organ damage are all associated with the ingestion of genetically modified

GM foods are in the middle of many controversial issues; primarily these are addressed by conflicts over the relative pros and cons of GM foods. Major biotech companies like ‘Monsanto ' and ‘Cargill ' are promoting GM foods by focusing only on their beneficial aspects, giving least importance to their negative effects on safety, environment and biodiversity. On the other hand, governmental regulators and nongovernmental organizations, along with some scientists, are strictly opposing this type of blind promotion of GM food by enlightening the people on their negative effects The controversies associated with GM foods include issues such as safety, environmental benefits and risks, biodiversity, and ethical and social considerations.GM foods are implicated for adverse human health risks like people being allergic to it, environmental hazards such as development of super weeds, and pesticide and antibiotic resistance in disease causing organisms. On the other

As said before, GMOs are genetically modified organisms, and can be dangerous, so experts say. They say that the GMO process causes diseases such as cancer or diabetes, and some also say that GM foods can cause allergic reactions. They are saying this because, as they have discovered, some companies have mixed protein from nuts and inserted into beans, which can be harmful

The human body is not designed to handle all the toxins that are put into GMO products, and as consumers, we should be informed of the potential harm we are putting into our bodies. Helke Ferrie, in his article “Evidence Grows of Harmful Effects of GMOs on Human Health” states, “…all modern human diseases are being caused by environmental toxins of our own making” (12), on the contrary, in the journal “GMOs – A solution or a Problem”, Mark Lynas claims that “… there has never been a single sustained health concern [caused by GMOs]” (132). Ferrie mentions multiple studies where GMOs have proven to “…increase the incidence of cancer, diabetes, hormone disruption, neurological, immunological and other metabolic disorders” (12). After mass amounts of research have been conducted to prove the dangers of GMOs, proof that has been gathered of the detriments genetically modified organisms bring to the human liver; researchers conclude, “… anything that upsets the liver must be… exceedingly

The American Academy Of Environmental Medicine have found out, Gmos also cause organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders. They also discovered the GMOs leave material behind that leads to long terms problems

Imagine this, a customer sitting down at a restaurant and ordering their favorite meal. The meal consists of corn, chicken, and a soft drink. All of these foods and drinks have GMOs, but the customer does not know what the repercussions are to themselves. The consumption of GMOs is detrimental to our bodies because of the unintended effects, the immunity to antibiotics, and the harms caused by pesticides.

Michelle Schoffro cook, PhD, DNM, Clinical Nutritionist. Michelle states that “according to research published in the Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Scientists found that the genetically-modified corn was linked to liver and kidney damage in animal” (Schoffro). In other words what Michelle is saying is that there is proof that GMOs could cause some damage to the animal’s organs. These so called GMOs are modified genetically so that they can produce their own pesticides and therefore they are immune to any plague. Studies show that some of those pesticides are toxic to humans. Some of those toxins are the Bt-toxin and Roundup Ready which are now found in corn, cotton and soybeans. These two pesticides have been linked to severe health risks. Studies conducted on animal have shown that GMOs can cause damage to their liver, kidney, and the male’s reproductive organ damage and spleen damage. This should make us wonder, if these modifications on the food have a drastic effect on animals, then we must assume the same thing could happen to us. In the same matter, now that these pesticides and toxins are built in the plants they cannot be washed off, which means that they are being consumed. This leads us to the conclusion that we are eating a food that could kill

While these are valid concerns, they are entirely wrong. According to the World Health Organization in 2005, “GM foods currently traded on the international market have passed risk assessments in several countries and are not likely to present risks for human health” (Novella). Many of those who are anti-GMO claim that GMOs are not safe because they do not know enough about them or they have heard far too many conflicting reports. While there are many reports that claim that GMOs are detrimental to the environment, the three agencies that oversee GM crops, the FDA, USDA, and EDA, have ruled that these crops do not pose any real threat. Since the beginning of the GM crop in 1996, there have been 2,497 approvals of the safety of GMOs in the environment and 1,129 of these approvals have been for the food safety of the products (Monsanto). This further disproves the claim that GMOs are unsafe for humans and the environment and reassures that there is no risk involved in either the consumption or the planting of GM

Dr. Gilles-Eric Seralini and his team of researchers conducted a 2-year study to see if rats (the same kind used in Monsanto’s research) would show any ill effect from consuming GMOs over a long duration. These rats were split into three groups; the first group ate GMO feed, the second group ate non-GMO feed, the third group ate non-GMO feed that had been sprayed with pesticides. In this study, Dr. Seralini noticed that the group with the GMO diet was the only group that was affected. This diet led to tumors in the breasts of female rats, as well as tumors in the breasts of a smaller amount of male rats. The male rats experienced kidney failure and a change in the color of their testicles, from pink to dark purple (Seralini). Male and females had difficulty reproducing healthy offspring, some of which had suffered from mental illness similar to Autism. Many of the rats showed a decrease in organ health and density, leading to a shorter life expectancy. In rare cases, the rats would even grow hair within their mouths. Dr. Seralini has suggested that GMOs may be increasing the rate of

I am strongly against the belief that GMO’s should be allowed for consumption. Although a large amount of food that we consume here in the United States contains GMO’s (Center For Food Safety), no official studies have been conducted by the FDA. Many independent studies have shown that GMO’s could be correlated to the rise in allergies (responsibletechnology.org). Studies have shown that when the safety of GMO’s is tested on rats, the results most commonly show that a majority of the rats receive tumors, or die a premature death (CBS).

The American Academy of Environmental Medicine (“AAEM”) released a paper, citing that in addition to the adverse health effects of GMO foods on humans, there are also numerous animal studies showing adverse effects. Still the FDA and the GMA continue positing biological plausibility. For instance, Bashshur notes one study in particular:

A court has ruled that French Professor Gilles-Eric Séralini was correct when he concluded that GMO food, when fed to rats, caused serious health problems including tumors.

Although “Studies show that when they fed GMO’s to animals they showed organ damage and also immune system damage.Along with accelerated aging and infertility.”There are a lot of reasons that people shouldn't eat GMO’s currently.

For example, the proof of serious risks to human health are scientific research, or rather the experiments of Ermakova Irina. She is a neuroscientist at the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow. Ermakova studied the effect of GM foods on rats, by adding genetically modified soy, a herbicide-resistant Roundup, to the female feed. The results surprised everyone: more than half of the rats in the first generation died, and the second generation did not appear (Ermakova 4). But supporters of GMOs did not intend to retreat and made an own researches. For example, the scientific work of Brake and Evenson. They were devoted to the study of the effect of genetically modified soybean on spermatogenesis in offspring. However, they used a different scheme for feeding female mice and began to feed them with GM soy during pregnancy, and not before mating. In addition, they did not provide evidence that they were using GM-soybeans, but only indicated the place in the field from which the seeds were taken. And, nevertheless, the scientists managed to conduct 8 series of experiments. Some experiments negative affected the genitals and reproductive functions, there was a violation of hormonal balance, infertility, the formation of tumors, and in some cases the death of offspring. In addition, a high level of anxiety and aggression was detected, a maternal instinct violation