Gmo's: A Large Change In Agriculture

The American Academy Of Environmental Medicine have found out, Gmos also cause organ damage, gastrointestinal and immune system disorders. They also discovered the GMOs leave material behind that leads to long terms problems

First, GMOs being safe depends on basically who the person talks to or what study they may look. When asking the question of whether GMOs are safe, the answer will be different from both sides because there is not enough research done on the subject. According to Gregory Jaffe, director of the Biotechnology Project at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, he says “the current genetically modified crops -- which he says are generally one-gene additions -- are safe. He says no food is 100% safe -- genetically modified or not -- and the odds of having an adverse reaction to a genetically modified food are slim.”(Web MD, p.2) Gaffe helps to show that only the first generation of GMOs is being called safe. Yet, the new GMOs being made are not being tested therefore the public do not know what they are honestly consuming. GMOs today,

That's why there is GM foods. GM food are way less cheaper than organic foods. “ Perhaps the most important development has been in the advances of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Through the use of GMOs, we are able to produce enough food at affordable prices to the world” (Gundersen). If GMO didn’t exist, food prices would be much more higher. If the food prices were higher, it would lead to higher insecurity across the world. Organic foods are usually really expensive compared to GM. For example modified strawberries are around $2, while organic is $5. There is a big difference between that. Organic foods is a big problem for people who have low come.

Much of the public concern surrounding the safety of GMOs stems from the process of actually creating them. This is admittedly not a natural process, which is a surefire way to raise critic’s eyebrows in doubting their safety. However, there is no evidence that supports these myths. The Committee on Genetically Engineered Crops, The National Academy of Science, and the Board on Agriculture and Natural Recourses all agree after extensive testing and observation that there is no additional harm in the consumption of GMO food. The research conducted in animal studies, as well as chemical analysis of the crops, show no indication that GMOs are negatively affecting human health. The next allegation hurled at GMOs is that they may have

Many will argue that Genetically Modified Organisms(GMOs) are not safe for human consumption, however they are almost inevitable for our everyday food consumption. Some argue that the recent increase in gluten intolerance is caused by GMO foods (Argument against). Other state that the risk to humans by GMO’s is relatively small (The GMO”). The bottom line is what people put into their bodies is a personal choice and a person should be able to easily tell if a product has been genetically modified or not.

In order to establish eating the healthiest foods possible, any individual can shop for organic foods that have “organic” labels on them. Organically grown foods have an immense amount of pure nutrients and healthier ingredients than GMO food. This high-quality alternative accomodates a healthy and safe lifestyle. The ultimate gain of health is indulged by considering a wise decision such as consuming organic foods and products. Diverse organic produce generates health benefits that outweigh the price premiums associated with it. Due to countless usage of unadapted chemicals, crops are evidently damaged and captivated with extremely toxic pesticides and insecticides. Recently, GMO foods have severely

GMOs foods have lots of unknown factors coming into play. There are many questions to whether they are safe for us and the crops. GMOs foods have been connected to sterile and dead livestock, and damage to almost every organ studied in lab animals. Labeling might also be costing us more than necessary. Some say we should stop using GMOs altogether, but right now it’s difficult to see what choice has our best interests at heart.

One of the greatest accomplishments since 1982 is the invention of GMOs. They were first approved by the FDA in 1982 for Humulin, insulin that has genetically engineered E. coli bacteria. The thinking behind GMOs was to develop crops that were resistant to pests and diseases in addition to improve nutritional content. GMOs have helped numerous people around the world. They have made farmer’s crops have better yields and a more successful growing season. GMOs are beneficial and should be promoted because they are more economical and they increase productivity in agriculture; however, the opposition believes GMOs potentially cause health issues.

One of the major reasons for the use of GMOs was stated by Chris Black, a plant science major and owner of Richland Plant Food Company. When Mr. Black was asked the question, “Why do farmers now use GMOs when growing crops”, he said “It really helps the everyday farmer with economics and efficiency. Since the US population is always increasing, GMOs have made a cheaper food source to the American Market.” Mr. Black also stated that “It also helps farmers save thousands of dollars in insecticide and herbicide cost that can become overwhelming, because many of the GMO seeds now have this trait. Plus Genetically Engineered crops are more environmentally friendly than organic crops, because they require less water than organic

GMOs are beneficial in many ways. GMOs are great for poor people to buy and grow. GMOs are safe and people have been eating them for a long time. Also these genetically modified foods are safe from pests and diseases that can make people or animals very sick. GMOs are beneficial for lot’s of people.

While these are valid concerns, they are entirely wrong. According to the World Health Organization in 2005, “GM foods currently traded on the international market have passed risk assessments in several countries and are not likely to present risks for human health” (Novella). Many of those who are anti-GMO claim that GMOs are not safe because they do not know enough about them or they have heard far too many conflicting reports. While there are many reports that claim that GMOs are detrimental to the environment, the three agencies that oversee GM crops, the FDA, USDA, and EDA, have ruled that these crops do not pose any real threat. Since the beginning of the GM crop in 1996, there have been 2,497 approvals of the safety of GMOs in the environment and 1,129 of these approvals have been for the food safety of the products (Monsanto). This further disproves the claim that GMOs are unsafe for humans and the environment and reassures that there is no risk involved in either the consumption or the planting of GM

GMOs are what some people say a very large argument between science and ethics. Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs are anything that has their DNA altered. What the sticker on the Wheaties box that you had for breakfast this morning that says organic means that there was no alteration to the product. Some reasons why GMOs are not a good idea at all is because what it has done to plants such as weeds. People also find that GMOS are relatively new and science doesn't know the risk of putting genetic mutations in a human body. Because of these two reasons GMOs should be taken out of shops, stores, and our diet.

Some believe that GMOs are harmful to the consumer because they do not like the idea of having chemicals injected into their fruits and vegetables, yet there has been hundreds of test done to show that GMOs are completely safe and are not harmful to humans in anyway. Tests have been conducted and independently funded by The World Health Organization, The FDA and many other huge food science companies. In the past 30 years that GMOs have been in us there has not been one case tying a cancer or any type of illness to GMOs, the unease about GMOs is merely based on theories with no facts to back those theories up.

According to the non-GMO project, The USA and Canada have thought GMO’s to be safe based on studies and experiments by the companies who make them. Furthermore, scientific evidence has indeed proved that GMOs do not prove a threat to human health. Also, “GMO’s have to pass safety regulations in order to measure toxicity and the potential to provoke allergic reaction”. (World Health Organization) In the results of the safety assessment GMO’s are non-allergenic GMOs have been tested by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization.

To start, GMOS give an edge to farmers. Who than are able to produce more food with the cheaper values.In the article GMOS: Safe for Society or Corporate Con? Says, “ Drawing a parallel with GM cotton farmers in the US, Dr Merritt predicted that with the introduction of Roundup-tolerant sugar beet, UK farmers could expect to use 28% less herbicide on their crops, achieve higher yields, and make a potential cost saving akin to their American counterparts.” Farmers have repeatedly said they would rather have their domestic market than sell to areas in England because that is more expensive.If GMO’S were to be banned farmers would have to use past medicines which are more expensive. They also might have to ship their livestock to get vaccinated. With GMO’S farmers will be able to spend less on pesticides creating more money in the farmers pockets.With genetic engineering, farmers will have more income, which they could spend on important things, such as the education of their children for example. As the world population grows and more land is utilized for housing instead