Go Book Vs Movie Analysis

Many people may agree that the movie was better, but personally, i think the book was better. The book let your imagination go wild, but the movie just held your imagination back by showing you the scene on a screen. Unlike the movie, the book gave a more vivid description of “The Tell Tale Heart” by telling you every single detail. That is why I think the book was more enjoyable to read instead, of watching the movie.

Comparing the book to the movie you can clearly tell what certain things are different. For example, Sydelle Pulaski worked for Mr. Westing in the movie but only talked over the intercom. This not only caused a lot of drama but more depth to the plot. Also, Crow didn’t go to jail but they did talk about most of the consequences of her going to jail. This made a little bit more serious and emotional instead of just letting it go.

I much preferred the movie version to the novel. For me, author William Kennedy’s style of writing is needlessly vague and difficult to follow, yet he did a wonderful job adapting

To begin with the first difference between the movie and the novel is poor character development, and how the character are shown differently in both the novel and the movie. When Gene goes to Leper’s home town, he finds him shell shocked. When Gene gets the telegram letter and goes to

The book and movie are completely different. It 's like comparing apples and oranges. (I 'm assuming that you used the newest version with Guy Pierce). The biggest difference is probably the ommision of Haydee and Maximillien and Valentine (three of the main character) and the addition of Jacapo. Jacapo does is in the book, but he is never a large character.

The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and

The 3 major differences that were seen are the shattering of the conch, the pilot’s presence, and Ralph’s attitude towards Piggy. Due to these major differences the novel left a greater impact on its readers than the movie on its viewers. Seeing the movie and as well reading the book, personally the book was a better. The book has a very different approach of that showed these 3 major differences to their full extent. Out of the two though, I would choose the book as more pleasant and

Both the novel and the movie have the strengths and weaknesses. In my opinion, it is more clearly explained about the strong bonds between Billy and his dogs in the book than in the movie. I can really understand how much Billy loved his dogs, and the expression of love was more in the book than in the movie. The book gives more detailed information than the movie. However, I prefer watching the movie because it seems to be more

- This book is a really good book not a very good movie because they have so many differences if they would have not started in the middle of the book then it would have been really good and entertaining but it just doesn't give me the vision in my head of the whole book . A movie to me is where a book comes to life and, but it still was a good movie but could have been

The book is better because it gives more excitement and emotion. The book just explains each of the events in great detail. I don’t know about other people, but for me the more information there is, the more I understand it. And in the movie of “The Outsiders”, it does not really say much about what’s going on. For instance, when Johnny dies, in the movie, Ponyboy goes home but it does not tell how long he had been out. In the book, Pony is walking home from the hospital and a man asked him if he wanted a ride (Hinton 151). Though others might think that the movie is better because it visualizes the events that are happening. But, even though it envisions what the book tells about does not mean that it is one hundred percent better.

If a person is going to read the book they might be shocked watching the movie because some scenes from the novel were cut out, or might be less affected on how the ward looks. It could be any five of those elements; it would still change the person’s perspective on it. They might prefer one over the other due to these changes, however the director made the changes from the novel in hopes it would still have a great affect. In conclusion, the novel into the film created several differences in characterization, setting, symbolism, plot, and

The book tells the same story as the movie but in a different way it cuts out thing the movies has or the movies adds thing that's not in the book. The book has some not many similar but . I feel the director was unfaithful to the book.The book and movie version of Our America had many differences.

This paper is over TKAM the movie and book to see how they are different and the same. First in the book since that is what we did first is a good novel it has many details, also Aunt Alexandra was not in the movie when she was in the book this was a big difference because in the book she was thorn to Scout, she became more like a mother in soothing Scout in the book but they did not put her in the movie which was a big difference. Another difference in between the book and movie was the combination of Miss Maudie and Miss Rachel the two neighbors of the Finches were combined into one person for the movie while in the book they were two people they were not one person. A similaritie in between the book and movie was the relationship Between Atticus and the African Americans, in both Atticus still believed in justices and he knew that Tom was not guilty in both Atticus still had a strong passion for the trial when he knew in both the book and movie that he would lose the case because the court system back then was colored blind.

One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest Between the Novel and Movie Between the two versions, the novel is stronger than the movie. The novel has more of an emotional appeal to the audience. When you read a book, nothing else exists and you can be a whole other person. You can live as someone else, free of your own troubles, even if only for two hundred pages. When the audience views the movie, they aren't getting the gist of what is happening so they wouldn't feel that sympathetic for the character.

The movie is better than the book because the book has too many unnecessary details. The movie is much easier on the viewer because the book is filled with unnecessary characters. While Mia is unconscious, she has flashbacks to the time her family attended a friend's funeral “We were crying, even me, who didn’t know Kerry all that well.”(173). The funeral had no relevance to the story at all.