Good Governance in Pakistan

Anything that makes slow the process of economic development is called obstacles to its functioning. The various obstacles to the Economic development 0″ Pakistan may be categorized as economic, social, cultural, administrative and political.

The time when General Pervez Musharraf took over, Pakistan was facing major economic problems such as

Lacking of the constitution can also mean that citizens can easily tick a yes or no answers, in a way that does not reflect their real views. Therefore, a people’s may vote no out of fear about what the proposal might do, even where they would have supported the plan had they fully understood the contents of it. I understood from my own experienced that the constitution is very document which may requires more times to studying it and still only an

The three consequences of the constitution are: the right of individuals enjoy such strong legal protections that at times they frustrate the will of the majority, the obstacles placed in the way of passing legislation create a strong bias toward the status quo, and even though the constitution makes it difficult to pass legislation, it has created a system that is sufficiently flexible to meet the country’s changing needs. The compromises necessary for the Constitution to be formed, because it is the only thing that could save the Convention from failure is by compromising. Additionally, The main aim of the Constitution was to create a solid elected government, directly receptive of people’s well. The concept of self- government did not

The arrival of the Taliban brought a dramatic change to the region. They set up a radio broadcast and started telling people to burn their books, their CD's and DVD's, to keep the girls away from schools and follow a misguided interpretation of what Islam should be. Pakistan was very affected by a big earthquake, huge floods and other natural disasters so many people thought that they were punished by God and listened to the

Gunay Alibeyli Written Assignment 1 Constitution is a superior law of any country and other laws are made on basis of it. That is why amending the constitution is a very crucial issue. The question can appear that “Why do we need amendment?”The word “amendment” itself means correction or improvement. Every constitution needs improvement in order to accommodate new political or social changes, in other word no modern country can live with an “old” constitution.

Pakistan is on the countries with more children uneducated. Literacy is one of the most important skills needed in a daily basis. How can they let their children down so bad? Getting an education means getting closer to achieving their life goals, but if they don’t get educated they will stay ignorant for the rest of their lives. In the book, I am Malala by Malala Yousafzai, Malala fights for education and shows the things Pakistan needs to work on to improve their education. In the article, How Pakistan Fails Its Children by Mosharraf Zaidi, he shows many different ways the children are let down by their own country. Based on what I know about education in Pakistan, they can improve it by lowing violence and allowing all children to attend.

India is a constitutional democracy which believes in the rule of law. The Constitution of India is the basic framework which must be followed to prevent a collapse of law and order. The judiciary is often called ‘the guardian of the Constitution’. This gives the judiciary the power to interpret the Constitution in order to hold up its basic ideals. This power of interpretation is at the

Indeed, the Partition of India and Pakistan, a decision made by lawmakers far from the front-lines, unleashed an episode of brutal depravity that might be unmatched in recent history. Growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims throughout the 1940s gave a ride for the desire for a Muslim state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who is regarded as the father of Pakistan, believed that a unified nation would only lead to marginalization of Muslims and, eventually, violence and civil war. An independent state seemed a solution to this danger. However looking at the grave situation of Pakistan today, was this a good decision or not is a highly debatable point of discussion running past the minds of

The right balance of government power over the protection of citizens’ rights is what leads to a successful form of government. A constitution is a document that states what can happen in a government from the power of the government to the rights of citizens. Many characteristics make up a great constitution such as limiting the government's power and states the rights of citizens in one document.

Thomas Paine said, ‘a government without a constitution, is a power without right’. A constitution is the framework that defines the structure and power of the state. It also seeks to confer power and to provide the legitimacy for the state’s use of power. This means that a constitution is a tool that is expected to protect the citizens of the country, while ensuring that there is not an abuse of power by the state.

It’s been more than 68 years of so called independence but yet we are not free. Although we were assigned with a new territory and a new title yet we haven’t stood up on our own. Pakistan is enormously confined within a foreign group of countries. And they manipulate us as they want and we are bound to follow them. A country prospers only when the basic requirements, food, clothes and shelter, are rendered to its citizens. But to do so, first we have to liberate our homeland from foreign affairs. There are a number of factors that are responsible for the downfall of Pakistan. Let’s have a look on 10 primary reasons behind the downfall of Pakistan:

There is a dispute between people who are against the codified constitution and those who are arguing for it during the last two centuries. People who believe that a codified constitution is more suitable for democratic countries have strong points. For example, Heywood (2013) notifies that a codified constitution entrenches major constitutional principles and protects individual liberty. On the other hand, a codified constitution can be considered more rigid and can make it much difficult for the government and society to deem and balance new reality if the circumstances change. This essay is not going to discuss the strength and drawbacks of a codified constitution, but it is going to analyze how both codified and uncodified constitution deal with developed conflicts and unexpected circumstances. Moreover, this essay will examine examples from history and constitutions of such countries as China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Israel. My conclusion will be that it does not matter if the state has a codified or uncodified constitution, because the most important fact is that any constitution should be flexible enough to reflect political realities and respond on changed political circumstances.

UK is one of the only three regions which establish an uncodified constitution, which means its content is not written in a single document called the constitution. However, it has long been criticized that the constitution is ambiguous and uncertain. The main criteria of deciding to choose a codified or uncodified constitution is that which one would make the British constitution more effective. In this essay, I will focus on the constitution convention part and royal prerogative power part and discuss the arguments of for and against.

Constitutions, whether democratic, transitional, or authoritarian among others, all serve a few common goals and purposes. The most recognizable purposes of a constitution typically include political and social structure in the form of judicial and legislative processes and civil rights. The goal is often to guide, give, and limit power in ways that benefit the current political elites and limit their potential rivals. Just as Galligan and Versteeg wrote in Theoretical Perspectives, “One of the primary goals of any constitution, after all, is to create, channel, and monitor power.” These pieces of the constitutional puzzle are an integral part of what makes a constitution a sort of “power map”.