1. How large should the discount (X) be to make this an attractive deal for Rabobank?
2. How large must the annual fee (F) be to make this an attractive deal for Morgan Guaranty?
3. How small must the combination of F and X be to make this an attractive deal for B.F. Goodrich?
4. Is this an attractive deal for the savings banks?
5. Is this a deal where everyone wins? If not, who loses?
Introduction:
Players: Morgan Bank, Rabobank, and B.F. Goodrich, Salomon Brothers, Thrift Institutions and Saving Banks
Goodrich:
In early 1983, Goodrich needed $50 million to fund its ongoing financial needs. However, Goodrich was reluctant to borrow (short term debt) from its committed bank lines because of the following reasons:
1. It
…show more content…
• Invest in short term treasury bills, large CD’s of commercial banks.
• Floating rate notes of major US banks whose yields were tied to the Treasury bill notes.
• Buy Goodrich floating rate notes with a yield tied to the LIBOR.
Structuring of the Swap:
In the swap depicted above the following can be calculated:
1. Goodrich receives the following amount semi annually:
-(LIBOR+0.5%)+(LIBOR-x1)-10.7% = x1+11.2%
2. Morgan receives the following amount as fees: -(LIBOR-x1)+(LIBOR-x2)+10.7%-10.7% = x1-x2.
Note: As stated in the case (footnote #2 on page 362) this fee can be anywhere between 8 basis points and 37.5 basis points.
3. Rabobank receives following amount semi annually: -(LIBOR-x2)+10.7%-10.7% = x2-LIBOR i.e. it will give out LIBOR – x2.
From exhibit 3 the following is also given:
4. Since Goodrich has BBB- credit rating it could raise capital at a fixed rate probably at 12.5% for 7-10 years.
5. Also, Rabobank could raise floating rate debt at LIBOR – 1/8% (LIBOR + ¼% - 3/8%) since it is an AAA rated bank.
Therefore,
6. From (1), and 4, Goodrich saves the following amount in semiannual interest payments : 12.5% - (x1+11.2%) = 1.3%-x1.
7. From (2), and (5) Rabobank saves the following amount in semiannual interest payments: LIBOR – 1/8% - (LIBOR –x2) = x2 – 1/8%.
8. For this deal to occur,
The bank rate is the interest rate at which the Bank of Canada stands ready to lend reserves to chartered banks. The banker 's deposit rate is the interest rate that the Bank of Canada pays banks on their deposits at the Bank of Canada. Changes to these rates by the Bank of Canada typically spread to other interest rates and therefore will influence the amount of lending done by the banks.
In addition, he needs to borrow $173.5 at the risk-free borrowing rate of RF,b . The
6. How does the current reimbursement level of $140,000 per case affect a decision to use or not use marginal cost pricing? Does the amount of excess capacity affect the decision? Why?
For option 2 I calculated the savings I receive from reduced payment. For that I used difference between the mortgage payments as annuity payment for 180 months for Question A and for 60 months for Question B
Therefore the annual interest rate is 8% and the effective annual rate compounded quarterly is 8.24%
Company issues 15,000 shares of stock @ $200 per share to raise $3,000,000 in capital with 5% return (cost of equity)
After the calculations you end up coming out with a rate of 14.87%. The third and final part of question three asks what rate you will need if the interest is compounded semiannually. All you have to do is double the amount of terms and you will come out with a lower number of 7.177%. Since the interest is compounded semiannually that means that you will need to times that number by two and you come out with your final number of 14.35%.
So, the 20 year corporate bond interest rate associated with the company’s rating is 3.86.
c. Is your estimate of Lex’s cost of equity appropriate as a discount rate for Lex’s total operating cash flows? Why or why not?
Chase should have bid for the loan mandate in such a way to maximize the investment fee income after controlling for risks involved, and the client’s preferences for syndicated loan. Thus. Chase faced a trade off between Risks and rewards. We have to weigh out the risks with rewards as below
3. How small must the combination of F and X be to make this an
company had experienced a shortage of cash and had found it necessary to increase its borrowing
An analysis of a repurchase of stock for $400 million cash, and recapitalization to 80% debt-to-total capital by borrowing $1.27 million reveals that BBBYs return on equity will be 113%, return on assets 61% and an after tax cost of debt of 28%. ROE is > ROA and ROA > after tax cost of debt. With the 80% debt-to-total capital structure ROE exceeds the other two capital structure scenarios of no debt and 40% debt-to-total capital. While all of this looks great there are other considerations. The household and personal products industries debt to total asset ratio is 34.69% while BBBY debt to total asset ratio is at 44% ($1,270,000/$2,865,023). Increasing to this capital structure would also reduce shareholders earnings per share.
We calculated that Mr. Wilson would need an estimate of 982000 not 750000 to finance the expected expansion. As well after viewing the liquidity ratios who tend to decrease in last years, it would be risky to take such a loan.