“The Gospel According to Mark” is a short story written by Jorge Luis Borges. The author grew up in Latin America, specifically Buenos Aires, which is mentioned throughout the length of this story. The short story introduces the reader to a character named, Balthasar Espinosa, who is a medical student attending school in Buenos Aires. Espinosa would end up in Los Alamos and read the gospel to a family during a treacherous rain storm, but in the end it would result in tragedy for our protagonist. The setting of the story is primarily set in Los Alamos, a country land, and during Espinosa’s stay a heavy rainstorm would force him to form a bond with the Gutres family. The setting in the country. where it is more secluded, would allow unfathomable actions to occur that normally would not develop in a metropolitan city such as Buenos Aires. The inclusion of a heavy rainstorm and isolation from a large population ultimately led to our protagonist’s demise. There are few characters mentioned by the author is this story, but the most significant characters would be Balthasar Espinosa …show more content…
Espinosa failed to assimilate into his new setting and adapt to his new found conditions. Espinosa failed to learn that the Gutres family would take everything so literally and end up sacrificing him. The author uses the setting to imply the intelligence of this family and Espinosa failed to realize their inability to identify him as just a reader but Jesus Christ in the flesh. I can say that in my life I have failed to assimilate to other cultures, specifically when I went to China. Their way of living was different from what I was accustomed to in the United States. An example would be table manners, burping at the table is acceptable there while it’s frowned upon in the United States. I use this example because this shows that the setting of the area will build the culture in that
Mark’s gospel begins with Jesus’ ministry, leads up to, and ends with His crucifixion. The gospel stresses the importance of Jesus’ divinity and discipleship. There are different examples throughout the gospel of this. Discipleship is shown on Mark’s gospel when Jesus first calls his disciples to repent and believe. In chapter two verses twelve to seventeen Jesus calls sinners to repentance when he has supper with tax collectors. This calls the sinners to follow Him. The best example of discipleship is in chapter eight verse thirty-four when Jesus says take up your cross and follow me. He is asking people to live as He does and commit their whole lives to Him even if it means dying in order to deliver God’s message. He says whoever loses their
When comparing how the Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of Thomas view the kingdom of God, the writings have some similarities, but have two opposing main views are how you get to the kingdom. In the Gospel of Mark, it talks more about how one has to repent in order to enter the kingdom of God. It’s portrayed as more of a place one has to earn the right to enter through various doings. In the Gospel of Thomas, it has written that the kingdom is inside and all around. It’s not a specific place, but rather the kingdom is present at all times. However, both Gospels describe the actual kingdom in such a similar way, both comparing the kingdom to a mustard seed.
John Mark was the author of the book of Mark in the New Testament. John Mark was traveling companion of Paul and interpreter for Peter in Rome(Harris,2014). It is believed that his accounts in the book of Mark came from oral passing knowledge regarding Jesus from individuals in the area. This word of mouth passing of information is hard for scholars to verify. Some say that John Mark wrote his gospel after the Jewish Revolt against Rome began. Scholars come to ths belief based on the focus on discord towards believers, war and destruction which would bring about the second coming of Christ(Harris,2014). With all the clues and information found in the book of Mark,it is still not known for cetainity who wrote the Gospel. The true author is considered
The roles of disciples play a very important part in developing the message of the gospels due to their close relation to Jesus throughout the stories. To start to understand the importance of the disciples first you have to understand the main purpose of the Gospels. The Gospels are written in order to describe Jesus’s life on earth before Heaven. They give people insight to who Jesus was and create a stronger basis of belief in Jesus and God. In order to bring the Gospels to life they use the students of Jesus or Disciples to project his teachings and stories. The disciples take on many different roles in the varying gospels. They are students, friends, witnesses, observers, and worshipers of Jesus. Disciples come in many different forms of people as well. During the stories of the Gospels, Jesus is essentially walking along picking up new followers and experiencing new things with them. Throughout the experiences, Jesus teaches the disciples and they grow and learn and as a result the reader grows and learns as well. That is why the disciples play such a pivotal role in the comprehension of Jesus and him as a person. It becomes evident when analyzing the different Gospels that Jesus’ relationship with the Disciples is slightly changed in the varying texts. A noticeable difference in the development of the disciple 's relationship to Jesus is present specifically in the Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of Thomas.
All of the Gospels describe the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, but each author illustrates the stories differently. Scholars believe Mark is the first Gospel written and is symbolized by a lion to denote Christ as powerful and fast-paced. The Book of John, understood to be the last gospel composed, is perceived as an eagle because the story differs greatly and is often more developed than the other Gospels. Comparing John 2 to the Gospel of Mark will depict unique themes and characteristics of Jesus.
Bible Scholar David Garland points to two possibilities as to why Mark’s Gospel is written in a narrative style or form. Garland believes the Gospel of Mark either came from an oral story circulating in the Jerusalem church or it came from a firsthand account of the Apostle Peter. Some bible scholars point to the idea that the Gospel of Mark was narrativized, so it could be heard rather than be read silently. Bible scholar Robert Tannehill believes the Gospel of Mark may even have been collected and delivered orally before it was ever written down. Michael Licona believes if a certain text appears in all three Synoptics, the Gospel of Mark is the most likely source for Matthew and Luke’s accounts. Licona notes that this rule should not be held hard and fast, since Mark may also have been using an oral story while Matthew and Luke choose another source or omitted material where it differs in each of their Gospel’s. The Apostle Peter seems to be the eyewitness account which Mark narrates into a single unified story, which centers around a single central figure Jesus and a group of His closest companions. If the author of Mark was using an oral story to write his gospel from, this would definitely explain its narrative style.
The three central themes in the Gospel of Mark are: The Good News; Following the way; Kingdom of God.
This narrative criticism was completed using online resources, comparative biblical texts including the New King James Bible, New Living Translation, Revised Standard and American Standard Version Bibles. The Gospel of Mark has no authorship specifically mentioned in its book, but is traditionally attributed to Mark ,an associate of Peter, around AD 60-70 , it is also confirmed by Church fathers around AD 140, although there is still some continued question as to its authorship. Written to early Christian communities, most likely Gentile Christians in Rome, based on the explanations of Jewish customs and the reference to Roman time system.
In the beginning Gospel of Mark, it states the coming of John the Baptist to make way for Jesus Christ. In John the Baptist's message he states while he baptizes with water the one to come will baptizes with the Holy Spirit. When Jesus came from Nazareth to be baptized by John the Baptist in the Jordan River the sky opened and the Holy Spirit came upon him like a dove as he was being baptized. God spoke audibly stating that he was pleased with his son. Right after this, the Holy Spirit guided Jesus to be in the desert for forty days, in that time he was tempted by Satan. After John was put in prison. Jesus came to Galilee proclaiming the good news. As he walked along the sea of Galilee he approached Simon and Andrew who he told to follow him.
Richard J. Bauckham, the author of The Eyewitnesses in the Gospel of Mark demonstrates the relationships between Jesus Christ and His disciples, specifically His connection to Simon Peter. He establishes Mark’s reliance on major and minor eyewitnesses as resources in his writings. In the Gospel of Mark a pattern of reference to Simon Peter is noted more than any of other disciples or eyewitnesses who accounted for the events encompassing Jesus Christ. Bauckham’s main point in his argument was that the text as written, relied more on the testimony of eyewitnesses (pg 1). In addition, he argued his inclusion of the literary device inclusio as related to the repetitive testimonies of Peter, Mark’s leading source of information. Inclusio is a word, phrase, or person mentioned at the beginning, repeated throughout the body, and the end of a writing at the highest rate (pg 2). Simon Peter’s name was repeated more than any other disciple. He was the prominent character and the major eyewitness concerning the events, which encircled Jesus Christ. Simon Peter was present from the beginning to the resurrection of Jesus Christ and mentioned throughout the Gospels (pg 2). Peter’s presence reveals his
The Gospel of According to Mark is written in the year of between 50 and 60. It is believed that Matthew and Luke used the Gospel of Mark to write their text. In this Gospel no one real knows who wrote it because the author makes it anonymous. However, there is some scholars that believe that the author could be John Mark. Gospel of Mark is considered to be using the narrative view of Peter. Looking at the language of the scripture, the author might have been influenced by the Romans. He uses the Romans system instead of the traditional Jewish terms. The intended of audience of this gospel is Roman Christians. At this many Romans were being killed due to their religion. It was a way to encourage the Roman Christians to stay during persecution and not give up on
The Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John all wrote about Jesus differently because of when they were written. The Gospel of Mark, written during 70 CE, portrayed Jesus as a suffering servant, apocalyptic preacher, and miracle worker (Frigge, 163). Mark was written when the second temple had fallen, and the Romans were in complete control. Seen as being closely related to Saint Paul, Mark was assumed to have lived to see when Nero persecuted the Christians, especially the disciples Paul, Peter, and James (Frigge, 163). With Mark’s gospel, he wrote about not only Jesus’s passion story and death but also, the miracles he performed and the way he interacted with his disciples (Frigge, 164). Mark wrote Jesus as the authoritative son of God
According to Powell the secrecy motif is “the secret of Jesus deeds and person as well (pg.44).” Jesus wish to keep his status secret was perhaps taken to be an implied permission for Mark's readers to keep their faith hidden from public scrutiny. This is best shown when “The secrecy theme is a device to explain why some earlier Christians had not know what otherwise would seem obvious. (Powell, 53).” Powell gives two reasons why Jesus may have wanted to keep his identity and his healing powers a secret. One reason was that he wanted to avoid getting arrested before his time had come (pg.52). Another reason was he didn’t want to address unmanageable crowds (pg. 52). Powell writes that the motif of secrecy in Mark’s Gospel is greatly depicted
Coincidences are a funny thing. They may seem completely uncalled for and uncommon; and many may say that the similarities between the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are just this: uncalled for and uncommon. This plagiarism issue is summed up at “the Synoptic Problem”, making the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke the synoptic gospels. The problem shows how many passages of the three gospels have the same wording, sometimes in the same order. However, the similarities balance out with the vast differences between what is included and what is not.
The Gospel According to Matthew is the first book of the New Testament in the Bible, and is a Gospel narrative. The narratives provided by the Gospels in the New Testament are here to provide us with descriptions of the life, death, and resurrection of our savior Jesus Christ, as well as to share His teachings. Like any other narrative, it is important to understand the historical and literary contexts surrounding the Gospel of Matthew, as well as the importance and significance of Matthew itself. As a Gospel, Matthew is here to present us with the narrative of Jesus Christ as our Messiah, as promised in the Old Testament Prophesy. While it is important to evaluate the extensive context surrounding the narrative of Matthew, the meaning behind the narrative can be found through relating it to the various events that are described in the other Gospels. By comparing the Gospels, it is easy to evaluate the underlying meaning and significance, within the context of the Gospels. Because the Gospels were written as narratives to provide us with information on the life and death of Jesus Christ, and all that happened in between, it is important to compare the different accounts described in the Gospels whenever possible. In doing so, it is possible to examine the Gospels within the appropriate context. With 4 Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John), it is important to compare them with one another in order to further evaluate the importance of Jesus Christ, as he is the