Essay about Gospel Of Matthew

However, although there are similarities, there are also differences. These differences have an implication for the message grasped by the readers. The focus will be on the ‘repentance of sinners claimed in the Gospel of Luke and how it differs from the messages found in the other two Gospels. I will do this by analyzing the effect of the differences in language, symbolic representation, location of the parable, audience, and the context in which it is written, found in these three Gospels.’

Matthew, Mark, and Luke are called the Synoptic Gospels because they include similar stories about the life, ministry and death of Jesus Christ. Although similar in material, they were written for different audiences and by men of very different occupations. Matthew was a tax collector and wrote his book directed to the Jews, and Luke, a physician, wrote his book directed to the Gentiles. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the foundational principle of the Christian faith, and no event has greater impacted history. Let’s explore the differences given in the accounts of Matthew and Luke.

The Gospel of Mark is a narrative of the life of Jesus Christ, leading up to his death. The Gospel of Mark starts off with the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist. In the first couple of chapters, Mark

Mark’s proclamation for the Gospel was, “Jesus died for our sins, was buried, and was raised from the dead” (1Cor 15:3-5). Furthermore there are two important factors of the gospel message that must be considered. First, the Gospel message is centered on Christ. Because of the influx of many false teachers and preachers who are in the world and church today it is imperative that the true and living Christ be preached correctly and effectively. Secondly, the gospel of Christ should not be altered to fit individual’s personal desires; however, it the gospel is altered then the gospel is no longer a true

In interpretation of Mark’s gospels it is important to take into account various elements of historical, theological, and literary context. Mark sets out to appeal to his audience by conveying messages that the audience can relate to. Mark 6: 30-44 is an example of a miracle story with a message that can impact many. There seems to be direct correlation among other gospels and stories throughout the Old and New Testament (NRSV, 1989).

Each of the four Gospels describes Jesus in a slightly different way. The Gospel of Luke describes Jesus in a way that focusses on the humanity, wisdom and compassion Jesus shows for the people of society. Luke unlike any of the other Gospels describes Jesus throughout the time when he was young whereas Matthew, Mark and John do not mention Jesus as a young boy at all. The Gospel of Luke is also different in the way that it has many unique parables which are only found in the Gospel of Luke, some of which include the Lost Sheep, and the Good Samaritan. The Gospel of Luke is also very different from the other three Gospels because it includes a lot of women throughout it as well as some of their stories. In the Gospel of Luke he also does not leave out that some women followed Jesus from the court to the Cross. Unlike the other Gospels Luke doesn’t leave women out during the time of Jesus to the poor people and the outcasts during Jesus’ time. For all of these reasons the Gospel of Luke in very unique and different from the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and John which in the end makes the Gospel of Luke even more interesting.

Jesus spends his time on Earth trying to tell His disciples who he is, and then fulfills His promise to them, and spends time with the disciples after he has risen and returned. For the disciples, this is momentous because everything that Jesus had been preaching to them was coming true. Unlike John, the gospel of Mark leaves a cliff hanger (referring to the non-extended version). The gospel simply ends with “for they were afraid.” Even with the additional 11 verses, the gospel of Mark does not emphasize Jesus’s resurrection as boldly as John. Despite this cliffhanger, this resolution to the plot of Mark is fitting. Just as Jesus was elusive with who he was, he was elusive in his

However, although there are similarities, there are also differences. These differences have an implication for the message grasped by the readers. The focus will be on the ‘repentance of sinners claimed in the Gospel of Luke and how it differs from the messages found in the other two Gospels. I will do this by analyzing the effect of the differences in language, symbolic representation, the location of the parable, audience, and the context in which it is written, found in these three Gospels.’

The book of Mark is the second of the four Gospels and is believed by most to be the first one written. This book is the shortest and most active of the four biographies of Jesus, majority of which is repeated in the book of Matthew and Luke. The author of the book of Mark is not stated but strongly to be "John Mark" a missionary companion of Paul and Barnabas and an associate of the Apostle Peter. This book was thought to have been written in AD 60's during the Roman persecution of Christ. It addresses a gentle audience, portraying Jesus as a man of action, divinely capable of healing the sick, controlling nature, and battling powers of Satan. Marks Gospel gives special attention to the deeds and actions. Jesus is constantly on the move

The purpose of this gospel was to present Jesus Christ to Gentiles and to encourage believers to persevere and withstand the face of persecution and perhaps even martyrdom. The highlight of The Gospel of Mark revolves around significant events in the life of Christ. These events consisted of his suffering and crucifixion. Mark put the pieces of Jesus style as a teacher and his disciples ’mentality in his writing. When understanding the Gospel of Mark, it introduces The Gospel as a text read by scholars, academics, scholars, individuals on the street, and Christian people. Mark is a text that raises many important questions, both scholarly and theologically. The text verifies that by tradition John Mark wrote the book of Mark in the New Testament (Harris, 2014). However, it is furthermore acknowledged that his accounts in the book of Mark came from the oral passing of knowledge regarding Jesus from individuals in the area. Modern scholars are unable to confirm this tradition due to the word of mouth passing of information. It is also believed that John Mark wrote his gospel after the beginning of the Jewish Revolt against

The Gospel according to Luke gives readers another look at the life and ministry of Jesus, yet with a distinctive perspective, namely because of Luke’s own personhood. Most scholars agree that Luke, the traveling companion of the Apostle Paul, is indeed the author of the two-part volume Luke-Acts. In addition, Luke was not an eyewitness to Jesus and was a Gentile physician. Both of these factors play a major role in his literary style and theology. Specifically, the most distinguished features of Luke’s Gospel is his portrayal of Jesus as friend to the outsider, as well as, his painstaking attention to detail, which connects to a more educated people group, and his aim to present Jesus as both prophet and Christ.

As with the other Gospels, Luke is considered an extension or expansion of Mark and he clearly did not know Jesus (Harris, 2014). Luke’s themes ring true to the Christian communities in which he writes to, and still applies in today’s world.

Mark’s disciples’ significance is to be an example for the readers of the gospel both in a positive light and as failures is to understand that Jesus is the Son of God.

Mark was an evangelist. He was not one of the original twelve disciples. His surname was “John” (Acts. 12:12,25). His Roman name was “Marcus”. This name was more commonly used rather than his Jewish name John (Acts 4:10; 13:5,13, Mark 15:39, and 1 Tim. 4:11). He was the son of Mary, a woman of influence and wealth. Mark was born in Jerusalem (Acts 12:12) and was the cousin of Barnabas (Col. 4:10). It was at his mother’s house that Peter found them praying when he was delivered out of prison. It was probably here that Mark got converted by Peter (Mark14:51-52). The date of the book was before A.D. 70 and It was titled

The Gospel of Mark consists of the “good news” of the life, death, and resurrection of christ. It presents Jesus as a teacher, prophet, miracle worker, military leader and political king. Through the book Jesus preforms several miracles and asks his audience not to tell anyone what they had seen. It also mentions he is the son of god several times throughout the book. Jesus is able to foretell his death in chapter 8 verses 31-37 even through he isn’t crucified and buried in the tomb of Joseph until chapter 15. After he foretold his death to his disciples, Peter rebuked him and Jesus responded by saying “get behind me Satan! For you are setting your mind not on divine things but on human things” (Mark 8:33). In chapter 15, verses 33-41, Jesus