Government And The Government Of The United States Government

This led to the credit freezing up because less money was in circulation resulting in deflation which was the downfall of the economy. Furthermore, due to deflation unemployment escalated because when prices dropped businesses had to cut cost by

Basically, people started throwing away their savings and borrowing bank money leading them into a debt life. The saving rates continue to drop more and more over the years, leading to Americans having no savings altogether, putting many people in debt every

America’s debt. became 16.2 trillion dollars because we were preparing to go to war. Fewer government jobs were created, and people started not spending money. Imagine all of that money that was used for the military instead of schools, and government paid jobs. We used all of that up all because of the terrorist's attacks. The stock market also did very bad for many years after and people lost a lot of money.

When doing that, interest rates rose higher than anyone has seen since the Civil War. Not only did interest rate rise, the lending rate rose also. It rose from 6.8 percent all the way to 21.5 percent in five years. Everyone in every part of the world was effected one way or another by this disaster, but farmers and rural bankers were especially hurt.

On October 3, 2008 President George W. Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, otherwise known as the “bailout.” The Purpose of this act was defined as to, “Provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure certain types of trouble assets for the purpose of providing stability to and preventing disruption in the economy and financial system and protecting taxpayers, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes” (Emergency Economic Stabilization Act). In my paper I will explain and show the relationship between the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and subprime lending, the collapse of the housing market, bundled mortgage securities, liquidity, and the Government 's efforts to bailout the nation 's banks.

The unprecedented government intervention during the massive economic crisis of the late 2000’s was met with varied sentiment of economists (Lee, 2009). For example, economist Marci Rossell felt that government intervention was arbitrary and lacked clarity as to which firms would receive government aid (Lee, 2009). She furthered her argument by stating that if the government bailed out homeowners and banks that were borrowing and lending “over their heads,” they were creating a dangerous precedent to set (Lee, 2009, p.40). However, Rossell praised the Obama administration for having a clear grasp on the economic situation and trusted in this administration’s guidance to recover from the economic crisis. Conversely, economist Steven Schwarcz said that though the government bailout in 2008 would cost more than it would have if the government had reacted more swiftly to early signs of recession, these institutions would collapse and fail without government aid (“How Three Economists,” 2008). If these institutions failed, the ripple effect of this failure to the U.S. economy would be irreparable.

Besides ruining many thousands of individual investors with crash, the decline in the value of assets greatly strained banks and other financial institutions as well. These places made the same big mistake the American people did before the crash, they had too much confidence and was very naive about the current state of the economy. Due to their false confidence in the economy they made an overextension of credit. Particularly the banks that held stocks in their portfolios were affected. Many banks were so confident in the newly rising economy that they irrationally gave out loans to citizens who wanted to invest in stock even when the stock was not 100% secure which became apparent during the Stock Market Crash of 1929 (Nelson). The crash of the banks did not only

“Lehman Collapse Sends Shockwave around the World” Reads the British newspaper, The Times, as the world sinks further into the recession in September 2008. The housing collapse was orchestrated and perpetrated by a system created by investment banks to allow them to make money, by keep the American people in debt, even when the banks knew the loans would default. The investing banking system was left unchecked by the United States government because it did not have the regulations as did the depository banks. There was immoral investing in people’s retirement, pensions, and homes where it created at housing collapse, in which thousands of people over paid in their subprime loans and lost their homes in the process. The federal Reserve is a very selfish and heartless entity in America that has had powerful influence in American politics for decades. The Federal Reserve must be dissolved and succeeded by a federalized entity that has no obligation to any investors. It must contain checks and balances to create a fair playing field. It must not benefit one group of people, but the nation as a whole. Finally, the new banking structure must be solid to keep necessities at steady prices, and must not work on speculation. Prior to “the Fed”, two previous central banking systems were in place, but were limited on how long they influenced (both twenty years) their interest in government, and twice, both banking system were not allowed renewal because many political figures,

The financial crisis that happened during 2007-09 was considered the worst financial crisis in the world since the great depression in the 1930s. It leads to a series of banking failures and also prolonged recession, which have affected millions of Americans and paralyzed the whole financial system. Although it was happened a long time ago, the side effects are still having implications for the economy now. This has become an enormously common topic among economists, hence it plays an extremely important role in the economy. There are many questions that were asked about the financial crisis, one of the most common question that dragged attention was ’’How did the government (Federal Reserve) contributed to the financial crisis?’’

Our economy is a machine that is ran by humans. A machine can only be as good as the person who makes it. This makes our economy susceptible to human error. A couple years ago the United States faced one of the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, which was the Great Recession. The Great Recession was a severe economic downturn that occurred in 2008 following the burst of the housing market. The government tried passing bills to see if anything would help it from becoming another Great Depression. Trying to aid the government was the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve went through a couple strategies in order to help the economy recover. The Federal Reserve provided three major strategies to start moving the economy in a better direction. The first strategy was primarily focused on the central bank’s role of the lender of last resort. The second strategy was meant to provide provision of liquidity directly to borrowers and investors in key credit markets. The last strategy was for the Federal Reserve to expand its open market operations to support the credit markets still working, as well as trying to push long term interest rates down. Since time has passed on since the Great Recession it has been a long road. In this essay we will take a time to reflect on these strategies to see how they helped.

The relationship between the federal government and the states has continually changed over the years. Each one has their set of duties and powers, and both are ruled by the U.S. Constitution. The states’ rights are more than well protected in the current constitution and the political practice. The Bill of Rights lays out what our rights are, along with fourteenth, fifteenth, nineteenth, and twenty-six amendments. The amendments and constitution continue to protect our rights as Americans even hundreds of years after being established. States have the ability to make restrictions

The United States federal government should limit the influx of refugees into the United States. Currently, three different entities oversee the United States Refugee Admissions Program. These entities are the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, which falls under the Department of State, The Office of Refugee Resettlement, which is headed up by the Department of Health and Human Services, and select offices within the Department of Homeland Security. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within the Department of Homeland Security has the responsibility of conducting security interviews, and they determine whether an individual is eligible to become a refugee in the Unites States. Once accepted, potential refugees are then broken down into three categories. Priority one refugees are those fleeing persecution, or persons who have no other durable solution. Refugees placed in priority two are persons from Iraq, Iran, the former Soviet Union, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bhutan and Cuba. Priority three refugees are the relatives of refugees who have already been admitted into the United States (American Immigration Council). This immigration system was meant, originally, to keep the proportions the same for every nationality and ethnic group. For instance, the United States government utilized a visa lottery to facilitate this effectively.

When one looks at federalism throughout the United States, do most think that it is still relevant to this day? Some think that it has remained consistent since the passing of the Constitution. But some people in today’s society think that the government authority that is supposed to be shared between the national and local governments is starting to be overpowered by federal law and local and state governments are not getting the rights promised to them years ago when the Constitution was passed. The reality in today’s society is that apart from military affairs and international diplomacy, most “national” laws, policies, and programs are shaped, administered, or funded in whole or in part through a complex, and often contentious system of federal-state relations. The arguments of the antifederalists are beginning to come through, that even though states still have some flexibility in implementing policies, it is overall the federal government that has the final say. The federal government has taken over many places in which used to be governed over by that states, such as social welfare policy, education, health care, and a minimum wage (Wilson, DiIulio, Bose, 2011). A big debate in recent years over whether it should be regulated by federal or state law is the debate over gun control throughout the United States. The debate over gun control in the United States today relates to the debate over federalism because of different cases in recent history relating to gun

All this lead to huge mortgages all around and therefore housing prices increased dramatically creating a bubble. According to experts this was not real money it was just being created by the system. Leverage ratios were increasing. It is the ratio of bank’s borrowed money and its own money. As borrowings were far more than their own money that is why leverage ratios were high and asset base was decreasing dramatically.

Easy borrowing tends to encourage spending and investing. Therefore, citizens will feel financially comfortable enough to buy wants instead of needs. After a while when all of the loan money disappears citizens tends to run into dilemmas from lack of budget and choice with the money that was loaned out. The bank actually had a big part in why these people faced hardships. When the banks gave out loans to the people, they knew what type of people they were and planned to give out loans to the ignorant. These people had no clue what they were getting themselves into. One thing that could have been done to prevent the crisis is, the federal reserve could have raised lending rates to decelerate the credit boom. Foreign borrowing also could have saved the united states from the great recession. However if we had not acted so slowing on this tragedy we would have never been put in that position. Personally I blame the government. The government is essentially the people we look to to protect us. Personally I feel as if the government saw it coming and knew everything before it even happened. Also the government