Government Intervention And Laissez Faire Of Market Mechanisms

The financial crisis from2007 to 2008 is considered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1920s and destroyed the U.S. economy severely. It led the housing prices fell 31.8%, the unemployment rate rose a peak of 10% in the United States. Especially the subprime market, began defaulting on their mortgage. Housing industry had collapsed. This crisis was not an accident, it caused by varies of factors. The unregulated securitization system, the US government deregulation, poor monetary policies, the irresponsibility of 3 rating agencies, the massed shadow banking system and so on. From my view, the unregulated private label mortgages securitization is the main contribute factor which led the global financial crisis in 2008.

One of the factors that led to the mortgage crisis was the housing bubble. It started in 2001 and climaxed in 2005. A housing bubble is characterized by rapid increase in the value of real estate properties to an extent that

The Great Recession inflicted abundant harm in the U.S. and global economy; 8.7 million jobs vanished (Center on Budget), 9.3 million Americans lost their homes (Kusisto), and the U.S. GDP fell below what the economy was capable to produce (Center on Budget). The financial crisis was unforeseen by millions and few predicted that the market would enter a recession. Due to the impact that the recession had, several studies have been conducted in order to determine what caused the recession and if it could have been prevented. Government intervention played a key role in the crisis by providing the bailout money that saved those “Too Big to Fail” institutions. Due to the amount of money invested in the bailout and the damage that the financial crisis had on the U.S. population, “Too Big to Fail Banks”, and financial regulation are two of the biggest focuses of the presidential candidates. Politicians might assure voters that change will occur, but is it to late for change to be efficient, are the financial institutions making the same mistakes that led to the financial crisis?

The beginning of the crisis: From the early to the mid-2000’s, high-risk mortgages became available from lenders who funded mortgages by repackaging them into pools that were sold to investors. New financial products were used to apportion these risks, with private-label mortgage-backed securities providing most of the funding of subprime mortgages. The less

The financial crisis that happened during 2007-09 was considered the worst financial crisis in the world since the great depression in the 1930s. It leads to a series of banking failures and also prolonged recession, which have affected millions of Americans and paralyzed the whole financial system. Although it was happened a long time ago, the side effects are still having implications for the economy now. This has become an enormously common topic among economists, hence it plays an extremely important role in the economy. There are many questions that were asked about the financial crisis, one of the most common question that dragged attention was ’’How did the government (Federal Reserve) contributed to the financial crisis?’’

The main reason for the crisis was a boom and bust in the housing markets at the same time. Home values rose rapidly during the beginning of the 2000’s. Many homeowners used their homes and other assets to withdraw equity to produce add-ons to the house, such as kitchens, decks, or patios. Once the value of the houses went down, they could not pay off this extra debt. Homes were beginning to be valued at less than what the homeowners owed on them. This period was powered by leverage, securitization, and structured finance. Housing was a hot commodity at that time, and Americans were taking out hefty loans in order to pay for them. There was a rise in self-employment at that time, and borrowing money was very relevant at that time. Adjustable rate mortgages, which provided initial interest rates and low monthly payments were the most common form of loans between 2004 and 2008. The banks were not careful in their securitization of loans, and a lot of loans defaulted. The defaults mainly revolved around the failing of the housing market. At the time, there was low requirements for down payments on houses. Lenders were only asking for approximately 3%, today it is up around 10% (Golub). This allowed for more and more people to put a down payment on a house, who would not be capable of paying the banks back. During this time, there was a dramatic increase in sub-prime lending, which means that the people borrowing the money had lowering credit

In the years of 2007-2008, the world economy faced the most severe global financial crisis. The collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market was considered to be the trigger for the Global Financial Crisis. In the United States, low interest rates and financial deregulation created credit conditions where it was easier for the American people to buy homes with subprime loans. It increased the housing demand and raised the house prices in the market, which resulted in a housing bubble. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are two private corporations that are referred to as government-sponsored enterprises. They offered a mass of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) to the high-risk borrowers. Rising house prices created home equity for the borrowers, allowing

The banking crisis of the late 2000s, often called the Great Recession, is labelled by many economists as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Its effect on the markets around the world can still be felt. Many countries suffered a drop in GDP, small or even negative growth, bankrupting businesses and rise in unemployment. The welfare cost that society had to paid lead to an obvious question: ‘Who’s to blame?’ The fingers are pointed to the United States of America, as it is obvious that this is where the crisis began, but who exactly is responsible? Many people believe that the banks are the only ones that are guilty, but this is just not true. The crisis was really a systematic failure, in which many problems in the

The underlying problems that caused the financial crisis of 2008 began building before many economists and policymakers are willing to admit. Since the laissez-faire policies of the Reagan administration in the 1980s, inequality and unemployment heightened. “Between 1976 and 2006 (...) ation-adjusted per capita income increased by 64 percent, for the bottom 90 percent of households it increased only by 10 percent. For the top one percent of households it increased 232 percent,” (Wisman 2013, 932) causing an income gap. Another arsing issue was globalization after World War II. The economy’s structure changed and outdated previous economic policy. Manufacturing jobs were outsourced because labor was cheaper abroad; the US imported more goods than it exported, causing a trade deficit.

A enormous problem on account of the housing boom became an economic bubble. An Economic bubble is when a demand gets extremely high, then, the price of the product or service inflates to the point where it is not sustainable and tends to burst as it gets too immense. People wanted to buy expensive houses that they couldn’t afford. The money came from other countries so that getting good credit was accessible and with that credit, they took out loans to buy the houses. This is called Sub-prime Mortgages. There are three types of mortgages. A Prime mortgage, which is issued to a person who has a solid credit history and a high likelihood of repayment, A Alternative A-Paper mortgage, which is a mortgage issued to a person with good credit, however did not have full documentation of income. Lastly, the one that the Lehman brothers applied was The Subprime mortgage, which is a mortgage issued to a borrower without a solid credit history or with bad credit and also who lacks full documentation of income.

The housing market crash, which broke out in the United States in 2007, was caused by high risk subprime mortgages. The subprime mortgage crisis resulted in a sudden reduction in money and credit availability from banks and other lending institutions, which was referred to as a “credit crunch.” The “credit crunch” and its effect spread across the United States and further on to other countries across the world. The “credit crunch” caused a collapse in the housing markets, stock markets and major financial institutions across the globe.

“Panic was spreading on two of the scariest days ever in financial markets, and the biggest investors were panicking the most. Nobody was sure how much damage it would cause before it ended” (Nocera, 2008, pg. 1). This is what happened as the financial crisis spiraled out of control in 2008 as bankers, investors, and insurance companies realized what they had done. The basic outline of the crisis looks mainly at the mortgage and credit disaster that was caused by the bursting of the “housing bubble”, but the main causes can be traced back to huge developments that shaped the American political economy and its policies within the last 50 years. While we do see this monetary motivation and over confidence as an underlying theme of the mortgage and credit crisis, there are other factors that contributed to the disaster. Some examples are an extremely strong and influential financial sector, lack of regulations from the U.S. government, and the neoliberal shift of the 1970s. While the mortgage securities and credit crises are recognized to be the immediate causes of the financial crisis of 2008, I argue that the strong financial sector and neoliberal shift in the 20th century are ultimately what set the stage for the financial crisis, making it hard for the U.S. to persecute banks and investors for the financial misconduct during this time.

There has been a debate for years on what caused the Financial Crisis in 2008 and if there was one main cause, or a series of unfortunate events that led to the crisis. The crisis began when the market was no longer funding many financial entities. The Federal Reserve then lowered the federal funds rate from 5.25% to almost zero percent in December 2008. The Federal Government realized that this was not enough and decided to bail out Bear Stearns, which inhibited JP Morgan Chase to buy Bear Stearns. Unfortunately Bear Stearns was not the only financial entity that needed saving, Lehman Brothers needed help as well. Lehman Brothers was twice the size of Bear Stearns and the government could not bail them out. Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy on September 15, 2008. Lehman Brothers bankruptcy caused the market tensions to become disastrous. The Fed then had to bail out American International Group the day after Lehman Brothers failed (Poole, 2010). Some blame poor policy making and others blame the government. The main causes of the financial crisis are the deregulation of banks and bank corruption.

The purpose of this paper is to give a brief background of what led to the financial crisis of 2007-2009, as well as to provide an account of the underlying causes. The ultimate goal of the paper is to provide a quick look at how the financial crisis impacted financial institutions and markets. Poor risk management, inadequate capital reserves, and a too-big-to-fail mentality were root causes in the chaos that developed in the late 2000s. The resulting financial crisis had far-reaching impacts on liquidity, interest rates, and initial public offerings. Financial institutions such as pension funds, commercial banks, insurance companies, and mutual funds failed to use sound investment guidelines and risk management strategies to overcome the devaluation of mortgage-backed securities. Fortunately, current regulations have significantly increased oversight of these institutions on matters such as risk management and capital adequacy. Finally, this paper offers recommendations on how regulations can be changed to limit excessive risk taking.

It is not only unnecessary for the government to intervene to maintain a free market, it is extremely wrong. Intervention by any outside party in corporate matters is inappropriate and basically contradicts the meaning of a free market.