Government Roles In Government

Judicial power is given to the Supreme Court. All nine federal judges are appointed by the President and serve "during good behavior," usually meaning for life. The judges cannot be removed from office except for criminal behavior or malfeasance. This makes them less vulnerable to political pressure and outside influence. The main feature of the independent role for the courts lies in their power to interpret the Constitution. They review the "constitutionality" of laws and executive orders. There are

There ideas were very similar such as the belief of unalienable rights. That the people have these rights which are life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. This is what Thomas Jefferson said

I completely agree with what you are saying I think that we do need to be able to vote for a judge as we do with an official. Do you think you could explain to some of our readers what judicial review is?

The central government is normally located in the capital city; which in our case it’s London. The central government runs the whole country by taking up the most important responsibilities that any other government levels in the UK has. These responsibilities are making new laws, signing agreements with the other nations and also defending the nation. The central government has these responsibilities as it’s the main government within the UK and it contains the 3 political institutions which make up parliament which are: the House of Commons, and the House of Lords and the monarch. These institutions work together. The house of commons creates new laws which they feel will work well for the British community. The house of lords has a

The United States judicial branch to the general American public can seem insulated from politics, because of their adversarial system, that does not allow judges to choose their cases. The judicial branch unlike, their two counterparts, the legislative and executive at large rely on the respect of the American people and the heads of the two other branches. In appointing members of the federal judiciary, Presidents appoint members who resemble their political ideologies and their likelihood of confirmation in the Senate, the Senate confirms these members based on their performance on the litmus test and Senatorial courtesy. Courts, specifically the Supreme Court, make decisions based on the Constitution, but the legislative branch has the

Ramona Salvarez: I do believe that judges should be elected. Most people are not designed to be judges, it's not their cup of tea. That's why I think it's best for someone to know what they're doing and can actually

The judicial branch of U.S. government is comprised of the court system; their task is to resolve legal issues and interpret the law.

If you think that this is an odd way to elect our judges, you are not alone. Even the former chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court, Wallace Jefferson is a misguided way to elect our judges. (Horwitz). One major drawback for this is with the people who vote in the election, more often time than not do not have adequate information to give a well-informed vote. Most of the time, if people do not have a lot information about all the candidates on the ballot, then they nearly every time vote for the name they know which is the name running for re-election. For the voters who do this they might possibly be jeopardizing a better person qualified for the position, but they do not realize this because of the lack of information that they have access

A crucial argument left unanswered is if state judges should be appointed or elected? Conflicting views raise many questions about how things would change in the court system. According to the article Justice at Stake, “One of the hottest debates in judicial politics today is whether judges should be chosen through competitive election or appointments. Each side has pros and cons”. Many states elect their judges through a merit selection process or appoint them through a process called the partisan election. Texas judges use partisan election where judges are elected by the people. Another question that arises is if Texas should continue using the partisan election to elect their judges when it may seem untrustworthy. A decision could be discussed on the process in electing state judges such as on the topics of improvements, conflictions, and which process seems more reasonable. Improvements can be made to the process of electing state judges… Overall, the appointment of judges varies by state, but looking at Texas’ past and present justice system will determine whether Texas should continue to elect, or switch over to appoint.

1. What do you think is the most important similarity and which is the most important difference? Use specifics to support your answer.

Even though they share a lot of similarities, they still exist some differences. Such as,

Many senators have asked me about my judicial philosophy numerous times in the past few weeks. My response is that the judicial role is one in which judges and justices must apply the law, and not make it. Judges and justices have a limited role and these members of the judicial branch should have humility, recognition that we operate within a system of precedent, and be as open as possible in the decisional process with colleagues who are striving to ensure fairness and equality in the constitutional rights for the individuals in America.

With this information that highlights the key responsibilities of a judge, we can better understand that the judge is enforcing the law much like a police officer does so within the community. A Judges enforce the law with a courtroom in order for justice to take place. For example, in the Sterling case Superior Court Judge Michael Levanas heard both sides of the oral arguments presented. His ruling on the case wasn’t based on personal feelings. It was based on facts, enthralling oral arguments, and his understanding of the law.

The role of a government in creating order in society is to establish a set of laws to protect the people, their property, and their rights;

Government policy can be described as the declaration that defines the objective of the priorities and goals of the government. Since these policies outline the rules, role, and procedures, they develop a framework in which the government and its citizens can carry out their specific duties. The public policies are created by all governmental levels and target the entire population or particular groups. The process of developing these policies involves the engagement of governmental officials and citizens. On the other hand, politics of government provide the platform for the development, establishment, and implementation of public policy. Therefore, the politics of government are the platform with which public policies are adopted and implemented.