Government should not prop up Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, a technology that shows little promise, by generous taxpayer subsidies. Imagine, after coming home from work, you just plug your car battery into an outlet in your garage, and then the next morning, your car is full of energy. You would not be late because you never have to stop by any gas station to fill up the gas tank, and you could save money for gas each week. You would not see smoke from the tailpipe and your car is quieter. That image sounds great, and those are some of the benefits an electric car could bring to us. The Obama administration has set a national goal of one million electric cars on American roads by 2015 and this goal was supported with $5 billion in taxpayer …show more content…
Consumer Reports said: "City traffic is supposed to be the hybrids ' strong suit, but their shortfall amounted to a 40 percent deficit on average." Richard Burr, deputy editor of the Detroit News editorial page, claims that when driving under real-world conditions, the 2004 Toyota Prius fell 42 percent short of its city miles per gallon (MPG) rating and required more refueling than a diesel car. Gas would have to reach $5.6 a gallon for over 5 years to offset the higher sticker price of the Ford Escape hybrid. According to the Department of Energy, the compact car gets close to 40 miles per gallon and the Eco version gets 42 mpg on the highway. It also costs far less at a starting price of about $17,000. For electric cars, they currently have a limited range, weight issues associated with the storage batteries, and need to recharge for several hours with relatively high-cost electric power. Moreover, the cost of producing larger batteries to improve the range of EVs is currently prohibitive. This makes electric cars are so expensive. Robert Bryce, a former veteran writer for the Austin Chronicle and a journalist who focuses on energy issues and politic gives an example: the new Chevrolet Volt costs $41,000 as much as a new Mercedes-Benz C350 whereas the Honda Fit costs about one-third as much as the new Volt. Therefore, Burr and Bryce charge that owning a gas-electric hybrid or an electric car is merely a fashion statement and should not
“We can break our dependence on oil…and become the first country to have one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015,” President Obama said in his January 2011 State of the Union address (Institute for Energy Research 1). While this may sound promising, the practicality and merit in achieving this goal remains unclear. Auto manufacturers have been working on plans for electric cars for years, especially the three largest companies in the US: Chevrolet, Chrysler, and Ford. These companies have been hoping that the development of electric cars would create a sort of lifestyle change for consumers, both weaning the U.S. off of its dependence on foreign oil and breathing life into the market for auto sales at the same time. Electric cars are often sold as zero emissions, but technically that is only true once they are charged and in terms of their tailpipe emissions. After all, they have to get their energy from somewhere and, more often than not, the electricity used for charging is supplied by traditional coal fired power plants. The real question then is whether the source and amount of energy required to build and supply an electric car with power is actually cleaner and more economical than a traditional combustion automobile. As it turns out, the answer is both unexpected and fairly complicated. In order to assess whether the use of
Everyone around the country needs to work to lower emissions into the air to reduce the greenhouse gases trapping heat in the atmosphere. I am not a fan of electric vehicles but, they are better for the environment than gas or diesel vehicles. They release less gases into the air and can be recharged almost anywhere with solar panel charger adapters. Some companies like, Tesla and VIA (General Motors Company) have made a dream for a person to own and be able to afford one.
Gasoline powered vehicles are better! No, hybrids are better! Have you heard these two points-of-view? This last election, the question of energy was a part of both party’s platforms. They talked about wind and solar versus coal and oil, and gasoline versus hybrid vehicles. So here we are, the election is over, but the battle between a gasoline powered vehicles versus a hybrid continues. You might know someone who owns a hybrid car. My uncle bought one in 2006 and for him it works great, but he usually just travels back and forth to work. However, my uncle’s needs are not the same as my dad who is a contractor. In the end, you need to weigh the pros and cons before deciding on which vehicle is best for you. After much research,
Electric cars impose a serious risk on the oil and gas industry. The extent by which this market succeeds reciprocally defines the extent by which the oil and gas industry deteriorates. As with all forms of technology, there comes a point in time where one form of technology no longer appears to be useful in comparison with an applicable alternative. The current inhibitors of electric car adoption are the price of batteries and vehicle performance. With that being said, battery prices dropped over 30% just last year and are expected to continue dropping. Projections estimate that 35% of cars will have a plug by 20401. However, even in the next few years, companies such as Tesla, Chevrolet, and Nissan plan to offer electric cars on the market at an affordable price. The question then becomes: when the oil and gas market will be displaced by the electric market? If both markets produce a vehicle of similar price and quality, then it is reasonable to assume that a customer will choose the option that is more eco-friendly. The moral issue still remains: should the vehicles of tomorrow be fueled by gasoline or are viable options readily available and acceptable?
Likewise, when comparing the costs of commuting and running routine errands in a battery-powered car versus an old-fashioned gas guzzling SUV or sedan, the EV can seem like an especially savvy move for the household budget.” The point brought by this quote is merely this, gas cars have one major flaw which is its dependence on the fossil fuels. Well as these fuels get more and more rare, the cost to operate these vheicles will go up and up. According to Brad Tuttle of Time.com “The average passenger cars gas mileage is 36.5 mpg…”
On Edmunds.com.” Edmunds. Hybrid cars have been saving the world little by little, first off hybrid cars have an excellent gas mileage because they are powered by an electric motor and slight gas, which can go much more farther than gas powered vehicles(“What Are Hybrid Cars and How Do They Work?). Also it will not produce smog , which is a good thing for the economy and the environment, the other reason why they are good in gas mileage is because the are light and there aerodynamics (“Hybrid Cars--Pros and Cons.” ). Hybrid cars are changing the economy by using much less has and less oil, they are more likely to save you money on the long
What’s more, for the next several years at least, the electric-vehicle tax credit will have “little or no impact” on America’s
Adrienne Rich, a famous poet, utilizes novel auxiliary style keeping in mind the end goal to uncover strict and figurative implications in her poem, "Storm Warnings". The cunningly outlined structure permits her to advance in a composed way to clarify both an external and internal conflict held by the speaker. The structure of the lyric parallels the external storm occurring outside. Once the speaker knows about the moving storm, she seeks shelter to secure herself, and permits the storm to pass. The internal and allegorical storm, which speaks to the speaker's inner conflict, takes a comparative way; the speaker perceives the moving toward conflict, finds a position of endorse and comfort, lastly figures out how to progress with the storm
These cars are awesome in their own way but when it comes down to the power it is not good, you have to charge them but there is not a guarantee that is car will stay completely charged while you are driving. People have concerns about the range of the car and they have issues of how long it take to refuel an electric cars, it only takes you about 20 to 25 miles in an hour of charging. Electric cars are great new aspect to the community because of the energy they are trying to save but if people have a car that is not good in distance and has less power what people as a whole do with a car that is not worth much. They have people out here in the world that are big on the environment and who are all about going green and trying to make the world a better place buy going
The world produces around 85 million barrels of oil each day. About a quarter of that percentage goes to the United States of America, which is used up mostly by means of transportations. Most people get around from place to place using a car, a car that is powered by fuel. Everywhere one goes driving, they will eventually run into a gas station but not a charging station for electric cars. Regular cars, burn off fuel that produce emissions (carbon, nitrogen, sulfur) that pollute and harm the environment. Although, there are some positives about switching there are also some problems that could appear but could be fixed. Electric cars have the potential to reduce the amount of pollution in the environment, boost the national economy and help
The type of plagiarism that is the hardest for me to avoid is paraphrasing. “Paraphrasing allows you to put the author’s ideas into your own words” (Bethel University, 2015). I find myself using more of the author’s words because I am afraid that I will change the meaning if I use my own. The best way for me to avoid this type of plagiarism is to simply compare what I write to the original and to be sure that I am not summarizing the information. The difference between writing a summary and paraphrasing is the amount of detail that is included; a paraphrase is not as concise as a summary (Bethel University, 2014).
Imagine never being locked out of your disgusting gas-guzzling vehicle in sub-zero temperatures pumping your car full of toxic chemicals and then later emptying your bank account to pay for the environment killer ever again. This reality is near and approaching faster than ever before. Although, it is not completely beneficial. It is evident that at an international level, electric cars are needed. But, this is only one side of the story, despite common belief, electric vehicles are not always good for the environment. It is true that they will benefit bank accounts, however, the only way for electric cars to improve the environment is if they are powered by clean renewable energy.
The current high cost of electric vehicles, compared to the savings one would reap, is what is slowing down the market share of the
People against the transition of the car industry from gas-powered to electric cars believe that although electric cars are beneficial to the environment, they are not worth the purchase because electric cars are not as powerful as gas-powered cars. However, companies such as Fisker and Tesla produce powerful electric cars, which are more powerful than many gas-powered cars, but the high cost of these powerful electric cars are a disadvantage. “Fisker produces an electric car called the Karma, which
Since electric vehicles are considered to be 97% cleaner then gasoline powered vehicles, I would think the government would want people to be buying them.