Joseph Thomas Personality Traits

As mentioned in (Lussier, R. N., & Achua, C. F. 2013 Pg. 37). The Big Five Model of Personality gives traits of an effective leaders which are surgency, agreeableness, adjustment, conscientious and openness to experience. My organization wants these traits to be imbibed in its employees.

This approach emphasize that having a leader with a certain set of traits is crucial to having effective leadership. It’s the leader and the leader’s personality that are central to the leadership process.

Born in March 1840 in Wallowa River, present Oregon and Washington to Father Tuekaskas and mother Khapkaponimi. His father, as a converted Christian, took the name and passed it on to his son Chief Joseph, his tribal name was Hin-ma-toe-yah-laht-khit. Joseph siblings are Ollikut, Sousouguee Ollokut. His spouses are Heyoon Yoyikt, and Children Jean-Louise. Chief Joseph was not considered a warrior compared to his brother Olliku. Joseph’s brother was a skillful warrior who led the tribe to many wars said to outsmart the United troops. He was the only surviving chief of his tribe. In an article written by History Channel, Chief Joseph was seen as the spokesmen, a diplomat, and the only military leader of the Nez Perce tribe (History Channel

(2016). p.33). There are many traits that a leader must have to be able to be successful. Three that come to mind are trustworthy or honest, motivated, and knowledgeable. Ever leader needs to be honest and have the trust of those who are following them. This is essential for any plan or idea to be carried out steadily. Also, open communication cannot happen if one does not trust their leader. Next, a leader must be motivated and have energy. If a leader is not motivated, those who are following them are also not going to be motivated either. Someone has to be able to push others to keep up the hard work to get to where they need to be. Lastly, a leader needs to be knowledgeable. At work, often when faced with something that I do not know the answer to, I go to my charge nurse who is very knowledgeable on almost all situations that may arise. If lacking any vital knowledge, staff under that leader will not have anyone to go to in times of need. This leads to the follower being lost and not knowing what the next step is in their situation. All of these traits are what I like to see in a leader in my work

In this world, there are many types of people and personalities. The personality trait in question is a leadership. From group leaders to CEOs to presidents, leaders are around us. However, what makes one a leader? Well, a leader needs to possess the characteristics of cooperation, problem solving, integrity, confident, and the list goes on. A leader also needs to live up to any mistakes and learn from them instead of pushing it off or blaming someone else. A leader needs to not take bias, but instead be fair and look at the big picture. I have many of these traits in leadership.

I completed the Big Five Personality Test. The personality traits in which aid my leadership abilities are as followed: I am relatively open to new experiences, very well organized, and can be relied upon. I am social and enjoy the company of others, good-natured, courteous, and supportive, and I remain calm, even in tense situations ("Big Five Project - Personality Test," n.d.).

Another trait is inspiration. Simon Sinek in his book “Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action” explores the biological process of the human behavior and relationships the affect the fundamentals of building the organizations. All the great and inspiring leaders and organizations all think, act, and communicate in the exact same way but completely different than others uninspired. Sinek offers a world simplest idea as he call it “the Golden Circle” which includes three circles why, how, and what. This little idea explains why some leaders and organization are able to inspire while others are not. Simply every single leader and organization know what is the mission they are doing and few of them know how they do their

In the research carried out by Bass (1990), they found out that trait leadership theory believes some people are born to lead because of their personal qualities, while others are not. Trait theory also suggests that leadership is only accessible to the chosen ones and not available to all. In the past researchers focused on traits that were able to measure such as physical characteristics, aspects of personality and aptitudes. The current trait research has pointed the focus to more specific traits like stress tolerance, energy level, emotional maturity, integrity and self-confidence. Reviews of the trait research have found all of the above traits to be related to managerial effectiveness Bass (1990) and Marques (2010). When looking at the results of

The trait leadership theory focuses on the individual leader’s personal characteristics as the basis of its investigations. It is one of the earliest leadership theories upon whose tenets many researches on leadership have been done. Although it is not very coherent, its heuristic nature has contributed to its significance in leadership research. Zaccaro and Klimoski (2002) define traits of reference to leadership as the stable personality characteristics, which result in a consistent leadership performance pattern, given different scenarios and groups. They include individual personalities, temperament, rationale, prowess, as well as cognitive abilities. Initially, the theory explored both physical and psychological characteristics that tell apart leaders from non-leaders.

During the fourth and fifth coaching sessions, we met Saturdays October 18th and 25th. During both of these sessions we focused on how the SMART plan was being executed. Jeff was having issues with the system conversion causing him to stray from his plan. I asked him about what he had prepared and planned for these obstacles. He advised he was to cross train to have a backup so he could carry the plan out

The Trait Approach was the 1st systematic attempt to study leadership. In the 20th century it was known as the “great man” theory. This approach takes a look at the leaders personal attributes such as but not limited to: motivation, energy, intuition, creativity, persuasiveness and foresight. Some of the traits that are essential to this list include: intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity and sociability. Thus it focuses mainly on the leader and not on the followers or situations. The strengths of the Trait Approach includes: 1) it is intuitively appealing, 2) it has research to back it’s theory, 3) it highlights the leader, 4) it identifies what the traits of a leader should have and whether the traits we do

Emma Richardson, as the facilitator, he didn’t do his work well during the meetings. He start the first pre-launch meeting with asking Barren to give a cost estimate report; and during the second pre-launch meeting he fail to hold the team focus on the discussion.

Leaders are made up by traits, skills behavior and effectiveness, which are determined by distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty, self-confidence, and appearance. However, the value of a particular trait or set or traits, skill behavior and effectiveness vary with the organization’s situation (Draft, 2015). For example, our executive leaders of Humana have their own unique style.

Moreover, the trait approach gives a deeper understanding of the leader element in the leadership process by emphasising exclusively on the leader, (Gore et al, 2011). The trait theory does not offer hypotheses about the role of situational variance or characteristic of the followers. Instead, this approach provide information about leaders, and about which traits cause which behaviours and that certain set of traits are central to the leadership process and play an indispensible part of effective leadership.

This theory is based on the premise that there are certain personality characteristics that are essential for a person to possess in order to be a leader. The main emphasis is on what the person is in terms of a constellation of personality traits. This theory searches for that set of universal leadership traits that will assure success. Numerous traits have been suggested: courage, integrity, loyalty, charisma, ambition, intelligence, honesty, clairvoyance, persistence, arrogance, health, political skill, confidence and vision.