Graduated Licensing Research Paper

For many teenagers in the United States their 16th birthday is an important milestone. This is the age that teenagers begin to integrate more into society as they begin to drive and experience new levels of freedom. As 16 is the usual minimum age for employment in most industries some teens even get jobs for personal reason or to benefit their household. The minimum age to acquire a driver's licence should not increase to 18 as younger teens will not be able to help provide for their families with current public transportation methods in the United States.

Every day teens are given access to automobiles. Every day these young people go to their jobs, classes, and athletic practices. Do they all abuse their driving privileges? No. Then why restrict all teens, including the law-abiding and mature, by raising the driving age? This debate reaches all across the nation, to all levels of government, and many related laws and propositions can be found. If the driving age is increased, teenagers will have more difficulty getting jobs and gaining experience. On the other hand, if the driving age is 18, new drivers will have more maturity. So the question remains, should the legal driving age be 18 years old? No, the current driving age

The author states, “According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Association, states using GDLs have a 5 to 15 percent drop in teen accidents.” States that are using the graduate license have less teen caused accidents than states that do not use the GDL. These statistics prove that the GDL can and will work for those who choose to enforce it, and will lessen the amount of teen accident fatalities in the state.

Maturity and rationalization is not yet achieved or experienced by teenagers. In the era of technology there are several distractions for drivers of any age to maneuver. Parents can play an educational role by enrolling their teen into a driver’s educational program. Some states require students to complete a comprehensive graduated drivers licensing (GDL) program prior to receiving their license. The brain function is still developing in teenagers and may impede the quick thinking process necessary to become a responsible driver. For the safety and welfare of teenagers the age requirement in Arizona for a driver’s license should be increased from 16 to 18 years of age.

The proposed alternative to raising the driving age is a GDL. A GDL, or a graduated driver’s license, gives teens more freedoms depending on how much they have driven. Advocates say that it gives teens the time they need to practice before having complete freedom. The opponents say it limits the time they have to practice due to restrictions on when teens can drive. Another reason opponents give for not having a GDL is that it makes it harder for teens to get jobs because they have limited hours when they can drive. The argument for “for” and “against” are similar to the arguments for a higher driving

As teenagers are leaving their homes, cities, and in many cases, states, to attend colleges, driving has become an integral part in a teen’s life. However, many states are putting heavy restrictions on teen drivers to keep not only them safe, but the rest of the community as well. But that has not been enough- teen drivers still are a major problem on the road due partly to their lack of mental development. This has pushed some states to consider raising minimum driving age, eliminating the whole problem of inexperience in drivers. The minimum age should not raised, however, because it will not help the issue of road safety.

Graduated licences go off the chart! This restricts teens to a certain amount of driving hours. Now some states are debating whether to get GDLS or keep it the same way it is. Teens having Graduated drivers licence will decrease the number of accidents.

Some might say that raising the driving age wouldn’t allow teens to get the experience they need to become better drivers. However, co-driving and graduated driving programs both give teens experience without compromising the safety of others. In fact, since the first graduated driver programs were instituted, there has been 1,348 fewer deadly crashes involving drivers ages 16-19. Some states have strict driving laws that require at least 70 hours of supervised driving, a minimum intermediate license age of 17, driving after 8 p.m. or a ban driving on with other teens in the vehicle. Graduated licensing programs restrict these actions until teen drivers have more experience because teens in the first few months of licensure have a high risk of crashing.

It is essential that teenagers be able to drive before their time to be sent away to college because teens need the time away from all the distractions and anxiety to converse with their friends and relieve tensions. Without their license, they would have to be driven by their parent or guardian to meet with their friends. This is distasteful to most teenagers because multitudes of them just have one wish,

Recently, there has been debate over whether we should promote the law ‘no pass/no drive’. This law states that students under the age of 18 must maintain idle grades and tardies if they are to receive their driver's license. Several schools from around the country have already enforced the law, schools from places such as in West Virginia and Kentucky. Many disagree with the policy, and say that it won’t guarantee any improvement among students grades. However, I believe that it will not only motivate students to be on time, and earn better grades, but also help them learn that with privilege comes responsibility. I think this law has the potential to improve students grades and attendance throughout.

A tire lay torn on across the road, the smell of burning rubber and gasoline filling the air. A police car sits on the side of the road, the officer nearby shaking his head; there has been another crash with the casualties once again being two 16-year-olds.Many accidents occur from young and inexperienced drivers being on the road. 26 states have put systems in place to try and and stop these accidents, these systems are called graduated licenses. Graduated licenses vary in each state, but all GDLs have restrictions to them. Some people are for these GDLs, while others aren’t so sure they help at all.

How would teenagers react to a law that states that one must receive a high school diploma in order to obtain a driver’s license? I, for one, would not be a jolly camper, as I rely on the ability to drive for functions similar to school or work. I also see countless young adults would oppose this law for the same reasons. In this essay, I will dive into the effects of this law, including the hidden obscurities that would have those effects tied to them.

While there are many negatives about teens getting their license at sixteen, others argue that sixteen year old drivers are safe and that it would be easier to get place to place . One popular argument in favor of driving at sixteen is that the percentage in fatal crashes dropped thirty-three percent in the past years. Additionally, fifteen and sixteen year olds have the logical reasoning of an adult, experts say. The third major claim is that a surveys reviewed by the insurance institute show more than fifty percent of adults support higher licensing ages.  Also a sophomore from Hinsdale Central High School said “It doesn't matter what age you are as long you have practice and experience”(Gregory). Sometimes age does matter because matcherity

     If you had told me when I turned sixteen that I couldn’t get my license until I turned eighteen, I would have thrown a fit. Now that I am older, I realize that I had no business driving an automobile at 16 years old. I was the typical teenage driver. The cool one, who had the “Detroit

     The government has recently said that ever since graduated licensing started, there have been fewer accidents involving young drivers. Looking at it another way, it costs consumers less money, beacause fewer cars need to be repair. By having graduated licensing , there are fewer unexperienced young drivers on our roads. Also, insurance companies are a lot happier because they don¡¦t suffer too much by having to pay out claims. If there are