Grape Case Summary

In this case, there are several important issues to note. The initial issues is that a contract was signed by a minor acting on behalf of the company and not by a specified owner of the company. The question here is if this contract is legally binding and what recourse of actions the parties may have. The first step would be to consider the legality of the contract. In order for a contract to be legal it has to possess several important criteria. Contracts have to be communicated to the parties it effects clearly. (Kubasek 2015). In this case, the contract was not communicated at all to the owners of Muscadine grapes and it was also not

In order to advise Billy in whether he is entitled to the extra $20,000 and a share in the farm, the key facts and relevant issues must be examined to determine if the elements of a legally binding contract exists. Whether there was an agreement and intention to create legal relations between the two will be used to determine whether Choy has breached a contract between the two. If a contract is found to

This discussion board post will respond to various questions regarding the Contracts Analysis Case Study involving Marshall Petersen and his local health food business from a

In this case, there are two issues that emerge; the first entails as to whether Johnson, who is a farmer should be treated as a merchant according to the definition of the Universal Commercial Code. The other issue that emerges in the case concerns as to whether the oral contract made between the two parties of selling 600 bushels at the price of $ 4.02 should constitute a binding contract.

Mr. Grape is a 52-year-old single African American male who resides in Phoenix, Arizona. His parents separated when he was 8-years-old because his father was abusive towards his mother and his mother’s infidelity. Mr. Grape’s older brothers were high-functioning and well-behaved, which made Mr. Grape feel like an outsider. As a result, he had behavioral and attitudinal problems and frequently engaged in defiant, oppositional, and negativistic behaviors. After completing high school, Mr. Grape joined the military but was dishonorably discharged. Since then, he worked as a substance abuse counselor and held numerous hands-on labor jobs. In addition, Mr. Grape has received five prison sentences, as well as numerous arrests and convictions for many different crimes, and was seemingly bragging as he reported his legal history. Mr. Grape also has a history of substance abuse and has enrolled in two residential drug treatment programs. Mr. Grape does not have a history of psychiatric treatment or mood disturbances, aside from recent depressive episodes. He was referred by the court for a psychological evaluation. Specifically, the court requested an evaluation of his psychological and emotional functioning to determine whether or not he was at risk for violence and/or other maladaptive behavior that would compromise his ability to raise his newborn child.

The Great Depression was one of the biggest economic crash the United States has ever encountered. Many people scrambled to find stability in the midst of the economic crash as value for products and land quickly diminished to unfathomable numbers. Thus, many of the farmers were kicked out of their land for not being able to pay their mortgages and investments. John Steinbeck wrote The Grape of Wrath to showcase the common difficulties of the farmers during their process of migrating to the west. In chapter 5, Steinbeck uses distressful diction and expressive parallelism to introduce the emotional burden and doubt the farmers carried as they were forced out of their lands.

I enjoyed reading your post. You pointed out great ways that this story reinforced stereotypes of a migrant Latino. One stereotype that I had not thought of that you included was that the children in the Ceja family started working at a young age.

Consumers purchasing products and services on credit or a loan happens every day in today’s society. Tommy Takem is the proprietor of an appliance and electronics store located in a rural area of southwest Virginia. The business sells merchandise to customers who are predominantly uneducated, poor, and Tommy received a letter from a disgruntled customer who is claiming the contract is unconscionable, no further payments would be made, and if he does not clear the debt, threats of litigation and letters will be sent to the editors of all local newspapers. Tommy is apprehensive to the validity of the charges stated in the letter and how it may affect his lucrative business. The focus of this research is to answer the questions concerning the justification of the disgruntled customer’s threats, and the ethical or unethical business model.

Viticulture examines the production of grapes. Viticulture takes into account everything outdoors, including key factors such as geography, climate, soil, drainage, graftin¬¬g, the vine life cycle, and harvest.

BACKGROUND A Votre Santé (AVS) is a small, independent winery owned by Kay Aproveche. Kay has a relationship with a grower who grows two types of wine grapes, a Chardonnay and a generic white grape. AVS buys the grapes at the point that they have ripened on the vine. AVS is responsible for harvesting the grapes and all further processing of the grapes

These contracts signed by Mondavi are often long-term, whether they are dealing with grape growers or equipment suppliers. An example of this took place in 1966 after Robert Mondavi left Krug Winery. Mondavi met with several of Krug 's grape suppliers and convinced them to provide grapes for Mondavi 's new company. Mondavi signed these growers to long term contracts to provide Mondavi with the grapes he needed to produce fine wines in the years to come. This was unique to the California wine industry, because most of the deals between vineyards and wineries were handshake deals. Even in 1996, many small wineries were caught off guard when Mondavi purchased Sierra Madre Vineyard; several of these small wineries had handshake deals with Sierra Madre and could not purchase the same quantity of grapes from Mondavi that they had grown accustomed to in the past from Sierra Madre (Berger, 1996). Robert Mondavi has always done business this way, through a contract with specifications to the length and details of the contract.

The College of Business entered into a contract with Quality Tee Shirts to manufacture Fighting Okra, Statesman, and Lady Statesman tee shirts according to certain specifications. It is to ABC understanding that Delta State University College of Business approved an order of several shirts before making an entire order. ABC has been notified that the College of Business submitted an order a week before the contracted shipping date and Quality Tee Shirts has requested an increase in price. The reason for this price increase with Quality Tee Shirts was due to material costs outside of this company control. ABC Company recommends that the College of Business following the recommends listed in this proposal.

As of now, La Miel Filipina has four suppliers. Our supplies of honey come from a honey connoisseur, Mr. Dale Abenojar. We come to an agreement that if we buy gallons of honey from him he’ll give us 55% discount on his selling price. Our first meeting with him was an introduction about the classes of bees and their nectar source. He said that the taste of the honey is based on what the bees are eating and it also depends on the season. They are not a honey farm because they sell raw wild honey from different mountain forests

In contract agreements, terms are being designed to provide a stable formation. The protection of the parties guaranteed by the terms of the contract. In these binding terms, are listed all the duties and obligations of each party. This essay will first explore, the validity of the exclusion clause between Spinning Farm Limited (“SFL”) and Maz’s Supermarket by analysing the aspects of incorporation (by signature; L’ Estrange1, by notice; Olley2, Chapeltion3 and Parker4 and the course of dealings; Hollier5). Also a broad explanation of construction (Contra Proferentem rule; Houghton6) and statutory controls. Moreover, a formulation of an exclusion clause will be placed to protect the “Pick Your Own Strawberries” scheme of SFL from any future claims of consumers. Research into the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (“UCTA”)7 and Consumer Rights Act 2015 (“CRA”)8 should be analysed. This essay will substantiate the view that the exclusion clause of the Spinning Farm Limited was unfair, therefore, a claim from Maz Supermarket would be entirely justified.

Luckily, we were smarter than that. We put a cancellation fee into the contract. Before long, our relationship began to fall apart. He was planning to buy more wholesale packages, which did not agree with our business model of providing great services for our small investors.