Great Acting Research Paper

From the The Godfather to The Last Airbender, classic and forgettable movies alike all had to go through the MPAA to receive the glory or infamy they are remembered for today. During Jack Valenti’s 38 year reign over the MPAA, he set the standards of how movies would be rated for years to come. The MPAA’s rating system has become outdated when compared to America’s constantly changing societal standards which has allowed filmmakers to push the boundaries with their films while still getting the ratings they want.

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away The Movie Brats were at the top of the film industry, producing new blockbusters every year. The Movie Brats were a group of directors who were changing the film industry with their blockbuster movies American New Wave movement in the American film industry. The directors who made the most impact during this time period were no other than Francis Ford Coppola, George Lucas, John Milius, Brian De Palma, Steven Spielberg, Paul Schrader. Now will we only look into these three directors Francis Ford Coppola, George Lucas and also the great Steven Spielberg. All of these directors have created some of the greatest films in the film industry from “American Graffiti, Mean Streets, The Conversation, Jaws, Taxi

I believe that this action packed blockbuster that gave Leonardo DiCaprio an Oscar is boring. I believe this not because it has a poor scenery or bad acting, the acting is phenomenal and the scenery and special effects are very detailed and

Macy makes a strong moral choice and decides to investigate. It works. Action films, however, depend on strong action and a fast pace.

Films and movies are a composition of elements that make that essentially come together as one to form a piece of art. Although a film is not complete with missing elements, some elements when used out of place can break a movie. Some of these elements include, but are not limited to, a character’s costume and makeup, lighting, camera direction, acting, special effects, and, sound effects and music. In some films one element may be the overriding factor but when put together, these elements work together to please an audience.

Hundreds of movies are released every year. Filmmakers try to create the next jaw-dropping movie that audiences will stand in line for hours and pay top dollar to see. The key to success is finding ideas that appeal to a mass audience. Viewers are the lifeline of any production company so making something for everyone is a savvy business move for the film industry. To cover all bases, there are over fourteen different genres of movies. Film making is not a solo effort. It is a collaboration between the actors, directors, producers and other key contributors. This combined effort or mise-en-scene includes all the elements of the film to include actors, backdrops, costumes, props and lighting used to meet the director’s vision

Bad films seem to be even worse when talented people are funding, starring or involved in production. One example is the 1987 film Leonard Part 6. It had a huge cast of stars including Bill Cosby and Tom Courtenay, who were both well respected actors at that time (Bailey). Directing the film was Barry Sonnenfeld, the man behind the Men in Black franchise, The Addams Family film, and Big starring Tom Hanks. Leonard Part 6 could have been an amazing action comedy, but it flopped. To give an example of just one failure, there were no other Leonard films, the franchise started on six, because the backers thought it would be funny to imply there had been five other films. This confused the audience. This caused people to not see the film,

Adventure movies on the other hand, have an average performance in the market. Its total gross and operating gross indicate that people are developing interest in it and with time it might be competing with the action movies. From its mean and standard deviation, the genre is making its mark in the movie industry.

The movie brings the same, with no one to make the colourful action packed movie posters and DVD covers the experience would be lost.

Director Seth Gordon seems to have completely checked out with all of this. His movie has no pace, no tone to connect with. He wants to have it nasty and gross-out funny, but he also has dramatic moments and his silly drug/crime subplot. There are action sequences, shot against such obvious and unintentionally terrible CGI, you realize this is an outright failure on every

The largest case of failure comes for the Rocky series, they should have left this hometown hero alone. Who doesn’t love an underdog story, apparently Hollywood, because they went onto to kill this character with Rocky II-V and Balboa and Creed. Talk about kicking a guy when he’s down, the ran over him, backed up and crushed Stallone again. From his divorce, to his defeats and his severe beating from what was supposed to be the symbol for America, this entire franchise was a

“If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination” (Ebert vii). These scathing remarks are the result of an unfortunate encounter between Roger Ebert, the renowned acrid movie critic of the 20 and 21st century, and the 2009 blockbuster film “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen”. Though this was just one man’s opinion, however passionately negative, of a movie that grossed nearly half a billion dollars at the box office (imdb.com), we must consider Ebert’s 46 years in the field, best-selling novels based on this topic, a Pulitzer Prize, and assume that his apprehension, in both senses of the term, of the motion picture was at least slightly accurate. But it was not just he who was dismayed by the lack of cinematic finesse; the movie critique website Rotten Tomatoes defines the movie as, “a noisy, underplotted, and overlong special effects extravaganza that lacks a human touch” (rottentomatoes.com), and Metacritic, a media critique website that uses a numerical formula to judge a piece’s quality, gave “Transformers” a 35%, which, according to them, means the movie was “generally unfavorable” (metacritic.com). So if “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” really was “A horrible experience of unbearable length” (More Movies that Suck), why was it so lucrative? Could it possibly be that the film had such an

What makes a movie great? Is it a great director? The perfect cast? A villain who is just as strong as the hero?Maybe it is the story? Is it how entertaining the film is? Maybe it's all of these factors. I believe that once in awhile all of these factors come together to create a perfect work of art, that everyone can enjoy. A great example of this is The Dark Knight, a film made by Christopher Nolan, which had the perfect cast both supporting and main who with the help of a wonderful story made The Dark Knight is the greatest superhero film ever made.

What makes a movie horrible? It could be a bad ending or bad actors . A movie like Sharknado will leave the views disappointed. There is no better way of explaining it than "The Concourse" article, "But the Sharknado phenomenon mostly resonates with people because it nn embodies all the greatness of what a shitty movie can be." (concourse.deadspin.com). Rated 3.3 out 10 by IMDb, Sharknado is a horrible movie because of its special effects , bad actors , and not ending.

There are approximately 630 visual effects shots in the film that had to be shot individual shots in order to capture the proper theme of the storyline. Technical advancements were made in environments, lighting, and simulation of physical effects and integration of CG characters in a real environment. This movie was a true success through the use of well-known actors, and by using proper voice over acting throughout this film. Actors such as Tyrese Gibson (SGT Epps), Magan Fox (Mikaela Banes), and John Keller (John Turturro) just to name a few of the actors that made this movie a huge success. The reason acting played a significant role in the accomplishment of this movie was because they had to act without having the most significant actors being present, the Transformers themselves. All the acting conducted in this movie had to be conducted without the use of real robot actors and most by standing in front of blue screens. By the use of editing the theatrical scenes were superimposed into the background of the acting conducted. It took a team of editors and computer programmers in order to accomplish this mission.