Greek Civil War Research Paper

It was usually a tyranny, a form of monarchy or a select group of people. The Greek states could either be ruled by a single individual, such as monarchs and tyrants, or a select group of people, an oligarchy, or every male citizen, which was a democracy. Also the idea of a democracy was regarded as the Greeks' greatest contribution to civilizations of today. But actually monarchies were rare and often not distinguished from a tyranny unless the hereditary ruler was really kind and ruled in the interest of his people rather than himself. But tyrants were not necessarily considered evil, rather they were considered rulers that were just looking out for themselves.“The most famous monarchies were the states of Macedonia and Epiros, where the ruler shared power with an assembly of people” (Cartwright). The Ancient Greek government went through a lot of changes, but, unlike the government, the military stayed

The two dominating Greek city states, Sparta and Athens, have there own strengths that make them the strongest throughout Greece. Sparta is "located in the southeastern Peloponnesus, in an area known as Laconia" (Spielvogel 53). Athens is on the peninsula of Attica (Geography). Sparta is know for their immense military might (Spartan Military). Athens is known better for their "leading naval force in Greece" (Women of the Ancient World). Their government systems were very different but very effective. Each Greek state was able to conquer a lot of land using different tactics. This brings up the thought that every country or state could be effective if all the people supported the cause. Political correctness however tends to breed idiots. With this being said, unenforced laws leads people to start thinking that they can get away with whatever they want or better yet, defy the lawful order of an officer. This can than become deadly and spread, until it cripples the system and a new one takes over. What does this new system believe in? Are they idea 's that are realistic? Or are they the idea 's of tree-hugging hippies who thinks everyone is going to "play ball." Well little does the tree-hugging hippie know, is that "The Man" who was "keeping him down" actually did know what he was talking about. Maybe the thirty plus years of military experience wasn 't complete garbage. Maybe it was keeping him and his family safe from the psychopaths and terrorists that

The Ottoman Turks first ruled over Greece when it captured Constantinople and eventually the rest of Greece. This put Greece and a variety of other countries in their power. The Greeks wanted liberation from the Turks from the start and began having unsuccessful rebellions that eventually lead to the rebellion in the Peloponnese, where the war is said to have really begun. They were inspired by the successes of the French Revolution and felt responsible for the preservation and development of their culture. This bonded them together and made them feel nationalism. The Greek War of Independence was a successful liberal movement that achieved their goals and was revolutionary.

In a relatively resource-poor region, a society rose from the access of foreign sources of raw materials and markets abroad. This society came to be known as one of the largest nations in Eurasia. The rise and fall of this great nation has to do with war-fare and the conflict between city-states. Their division led to the widespread of language and culture. This is the great story of Ancient Greece and how individualism changed the view Greece had on certain issues. (Bulliet 99) From 1000 B.C.E to 30 B.C.E, Ancient Greece’s view on individualism changed the political system Greece had, over time changed the way individuals thought and made important Intellectual changes, and gradually changed the Economic system such as bartering.

Greek was in need of help. In what way? Greek needed economic assistance and financial help. United states was the only one that could help Greek as Truman said in his speech, “The United States must supply this assistance… No other Nation is willing and able to provide the necessary support for a democratic Greek government” (Document B). Greek state is threatened by terrorist which are led by communists says Truman. Without the help of United Stated the communists will take over. Turkey will be endangered, disorder and confusion will spread. Truman said that “If Greece should fall under the control of an armed minority, the effect upon its neighbor, Turkey, would be immediate and serious.” If the United stated dint help then communism would

The great debate in the 18th century over the independence of Greece caused a boisterous debate among differing nations. At the time, the Greeks were trying to free themselves from their Ottoman rule. After the uprising in 1821, thousands of Europeans joined on the side of the Greeks announcing their approval of their independence. Many posed their opinions. The views towards the conditions of Greeks in the Ottoman Empire differed between the Greek themselves, England, and the Turks.

Following World War II disputes between soviet and the Western democracies kicked up, particularly dealing with the fate of Eastern European states and the Soviets influential takeover. The communist takeover of Eastern Europe clashed with the democratic rebuilding of Western Europe forming what Winston Churchill described as a “Iron Curtain” a political, military and ideological barrier set by the Soviet Union served to set a metaphorical boundary between the Soviet expansion and the Western democracies. With the fall of the “Iron Curtain” “The Cold War was a period of East-West competition, tension, and conflict short of full-scale war, characterized by mutual perceptions of hostile intention between military-political alliances or blocs.”

The Persian War had a great impact on Greek society, particularly allowing them to become united during and after the Persian War. The Greek city-states that used to fight amongst themselves had now became united under one common threat allowing ideas to flow more freely than they had before. This unification lasted long after the Persian threat had subsided but the impact that unification had, was undeniable allowing advances in government, philosophy, art, theater, and architecture. In fact, the advances the Ancient Greeks made during the Classical period still impact lives today.

War has affected the lives of humans for hundreds of years now and is a major result and contributing factor to the absence of peace. The greek god Ares, who established his power through war, was a major contributor to the physical and emotional toll on the ancient Greeks . His control over wars made impact to the outcome of the wars. It also determined the level of peace during his time. Without Ares, ancient Greece would not have been filled with hatred and would have been more peaceful.

The individualistic nature of Greek society is further reflected in their war strategies. The Greek city-states would fight individually unless another city-state could find sufficient benefit in joining the war.

After the war the rise of Greek city-states came. For these Greek city-states the sea was vital, many different governments happened including Monarchy, Aristocracy, and Oligarchy. Each city-state had different ways of society. The city-state of

In Greece, the beginning of a political system was very chaotic. Around the end of the “Dark Age”, there was no real system of government that could be compared to a known system of government.

We must show the Greeks that they do not have to resort to communism just because their government is not what they envision. Our troops would show the people that Greece they are not alone and have the support of one of the strongest countries in the world. With the help of the Greeks and the presence of our troops, we could turn the government they see as corrupt and inefficient to a just and effective one, while also stopping the spread of communism in countries who think that is their last resort. Just as Great Britain believes that “Greece is vital to the stability of the Eastern Mediterranean region” , we believe that Greece plays a vital role in the stability of capitalism in that area. For this reason, we must go in and offer our assistance and support to a country that so desperately needs

For centuries the Greek population was completely under the Ottoman rule. The Greeks’ independence from the Ottoman Turks in 1830 did not come without hardship and suffering. Several other countries including Russia and France took sides with Greece during this fight as they felt close and connected with their culture. A nine year war was fought which eventually resulted in the Greeks gaining independence from the Turks. During this time, the Greeks had to maintain high morale and a strong disposition to be as successful as they were in the end. The circumstances they were under were difficult and harsh. Many people felt as though Greece deserved to break away from the Ottoman Empire, but some believed that the Turkish rule was not too

As far as Greece’s role in creating this crisis in the first place, it can be said that Greece is at fault for a variety of reasons. The media has been focusing on the corrupt political system and infrastructure, the lack of competition in the private sector, the wastefulness and inefficiency of the public sector and a flawed tax system as causation for this mess. When the public sector was expanded in the 1980’s, Andreas Papandreou was given various agricultural subsidies and grants to do with what he pleased. This enabled the funding of certain post-World War II groups to heal political wounds and fund unions and other special interest groups to aid his political capital and strength. The policies enacted in this decade allowed for the increase in power and funding of the middle class by creating a vast amount of inefficient public sector government jobs for citizens. This resulted in an increase in the levels of inefficiency, bureaucracy, corruption and wasteful spending coupled with the increase in wages, pensions and benefits. This proceeded to drain through government money and resources, and did not breed a culture of highly motivated, efficient and effective government employees. A high amount of debts accumulated as the nation continued to proceed in this way, using state money to subsidize failing businesses