In her article, Greenfeld examines the future of the nation-state in a comparative manner between the Western and the South-East Asian nation-states (2011, p. 5). Also, Greenfeld creates a relationship between the concepts of globalization, nationalism, nation-state, and modernity (2011, p. 5). In her conclusion, Greenfeld states that the nationalism that brought the West to world domination is at the same time bringing the West’s dominance to and end. In fact, nationalism is the driving force behind the competition between China and India as well as the future dominance of both countries of the global system. On the other hand, Greenfeld also concludes that the emergence of both China and India means that the modern nation-state will continue to exist through “impersonal and representative government” in both India and China (2011, p. 1). Therefore, I argue that Greenfeld’s explanation of the globalization of nationalism and the future of the …show more content…
According to Atul Kohli, nation-states are legitimate states that govern effectively and have dynamic industrial economies (2004, p.1). In other words, a modern nation-state is one which legitimacy is derived from joining the political entity of a state with the cultural and ethnic entities in order for the government to rule, grow the economy, and maintain the sovereignty of the state. Also, part of being modern means that a nation-state must have an impersonal government that represents the will of the people (Greenfeld, 2011, p. 8). Thus, Greenfeld states that representative government is the personification of nationalism which makes every state a modern nation-state. To be more precise, the globalization of nationalism in terms of a government that represents the will of the people is the reason behind the emergence of China and India as modern nation-states that are economic
Nationalism, a political or social philosophy in which the prosperity of a nation-state as an existence is considered supreme or more important than anything else. The primary duty and loyalty should be toward the nation-state. The love for one's country often reflected dominance and power as people were able to unite toward common good. Furthermore, republic governments were reestablished a result of Nationalism.
The foundational principles of a nation state also known as national sovereignty is for a state to combine its political and cultural entity as one. Some of the characteristics of a nation state include the ability to enter into relations with other states of similar capacity. A nation state is responsible for promoting economic unity and a uniform administration to govern its citizens. The United States has acted to fulfill these responsibilities by providing a single entity to govern the nation as a whole. The United States is constantly working with other nations to help protect our
Nationalism is the doctrine that your national culture and interests are superior to any other. From just reading the meaning of nationalism it is quit obvious to see that this idea will
Internationalism is a unifying force that has the power to impact every nation in the world and allow for their common good to be apprehended. Through ideal internationalism, political life can be regulated at the global level to construct a more peaceful structure. It has the potential to affect people in both positive and negative ways. Overcoming the difficulties that comes from executing internationalism is one of the key aspects of nationalism, it is up to the governing bodies to conquer it or not.
21.nation-state- A form of state in which it identifies itself by forms of culture and a sovereign territorial
1A.3) A nation-state is a state in which over 90 percent of the population consists of a specific culture or a group of
Each nation-state controls its own governing policies; even so, nationalism is a concept that cannot be severed from politics. To be concise, nationalism is described as the feelings people have when identifying with their nation. It has the ability to impact a country's social, political, and economic conditions. Incidentally, nationalism should be perceived as a negative force due to the amount of tragedies it has generated throughout the course of history. It's remarkable influence has left many collective groups feeling isolated or mistreated.
- Nation-state: a political unit consisting of a self-governing state populated primarily by a people sharing a common culture and/or religion, history, and language.
Gellner defended his stance that it was industrialization and the need of the state to develop a populous with the ability to exist within it and aid in the development of prosperity that led to nations and government to create high cultures and maintain them. One of the strongest forces in nationalism is the individuals imperative of “incorporation and their mastery of high culture.”13 This was the only way to gain accessibility to privileges within that high culture. Failure to conform meant a complete disconnect between himself and the political and economic structure around him and exclusion from the society. Therefore, all who adapt to that culture becomes a nationalist.14 Education creates its own culture. Culture becomes synonymous with
Nationalism can be described as a mix, multidimensional morally developed or created concept involving a shared common identification with one's Nation. It is more on politically motivated towards working and maintaining self-governance, or full sovereignty, working towards to a specific land or a territory of historical significance to the group such as land and its belongings. In simple Nationalism is a nation command and lead itself, free from foreign influence, it is the concept of self-rule. Nationalism is further formed towards maintaining and developing a Sovereignty based on shared features such as religion, language, race, culture, or either political goals or a belief in a customary ancestry. So its pride towards nation's achievements, and the concept in world history has shown positive and negative impact, moreover in a political dimension it leads either unification or disintegration.
placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups.” The concept of nationalism, essentially an
In his article, “The Future of the Liberal World Order”, John Inkenberry discusses what he sees as a global shift in power, from the Western and Northern powers such as the United States and Great Britain to the more Eastern and Southern developing states like China, India and Brazil. This potential shift in power has sparked a fear in many people. This fear, as the global power switches from West to East and North to South, stems from the thinking that these new nations that are coming to power will abolish the liberal world order that we all know. I however believe that instead of challenging the United States for power and changing the world order to more reflect their ideologies, these emerging nations will instead seek a greater position of leadership in the already existing world order. Firstly, I will provide an argument of Inkenberry’s main arguments and why realists’ have started to worry. Second, I will show how China is rising to threaten the United States superpower position in today’s world order, and finally I will illustrate ways which show that China is not challenging the Liberal World Order and why.
The concept of nationalism is in essence an odd organization that has had significant impacts in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society. As an important aspect in the development of the society, the concept of nationalism has basically been analyzed based on its impact on the emergence of nation-states across the globe. In most cases, these analyses have been conducted to determine the influence of nationalism on imperial breakdown i.e. the dissolution of empires. While the actual extent of the impact of nationalism on the imperial breakdown is uncertain, this concept has played a major role in the dissolution of empires. Generally, the transition to nationalism has contributed to significant effects in world history through shaping the political and social aspects of the society.
According to Rourke (2008) the most important way people have identified themselves politically for five centuries is through nationalism (p. 102). Nations are formed when people who “share demographic and cultural similarities [who identify themselves] as a group distinct from other groups and want to control themselves politically” (p. 103) band together in a national political identity which has “a soul, a spiritual quality” (Rourke, 2008, p. 103). Feelings of nationalism can be very intense and difficult to put aside because of this. For the concept of globalization to continue to spread and grow nationalistic feelings must be tempered with cosmopolitan ideals.
Some of the characteristics that make up a modern nation-state are; the population of the territory is united in the national identity and traditions, has an official language or languages and common descent, has an organized government, shall have independence and sovereign (self-ruled), and has a defined territory and/or boarders.