Grievance Appeal Case Study

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 903 INMATE WORK ACTIVITIES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden’s response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 902 INMATE LEGAL ACCESS TO THE COURTS

It is also my recommendation that this incident be reviewed by administration and this report be copied and sent to Judge Mack to review before

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The error was unintentional and corrected as soon as possible. The Stiner Administration has confirmed that procedures are in place to ensure this does not happen in the future. Stiner Administration will continue to monitor visitation.

On this day Marisol Escobar was sent home for insubordination. She contact me concerning a patient level of care. The patient came into the office on Tuesday May 25, 2016 concern a fast track program because she need to complete treatment prior to her probation ending. I was not aware of a fast track program after speaking with Mr. Herschel we agree to move the patient. The patient had appointment for Wednesday Marisol cancel the patient appointment. This writer contact the patient to make sure she could participate in the intensive program. The patient stated she need to contact her employer to make sure it would coincide with her work schedule.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 802 INMATE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden’s response is affirmed. The Disciplinary Coordinator investigated your charge and changed it to a minor violation. The witness statement you submitted was not used nor was it saved as a necessary part of your case. Inmates are listed on the distribution list of the Witness Statement (form 803-3) however; it must be used or documented as not appropriate or relevant. The Disciplinary Coordinator conducted interviews therefore no form could be copied

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden’s response is affirmed. The Cook Administration investigated your claim and found your documents were E-filed. You have not provided and evidence to substansiate your claim that staff are hindering your access to the courts.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Bureau Administrator's response is affirmed. You were removed from your position in ACI due to a scan of your outgoing mail revealing your negative opinion towards the ACI supervisor.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Deputy Warden's response is affirmed. Pursuant to DEPARTMENT ORDER 905 INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT/MONEY SYSTEM

The Langston Catalog and the Graduate Handbook contains pertinent information that a graduate student can utilize to make certain goals and objectives are met. The resources can be referenced via Langston’s website.

Thank you for the recap of the discussion that took place on Friday, May 19, 2017. However, I am extremely confused as to why I (i.e., Staff Assistants, Data Control Coordinator). In agreement with UH (signed in April 2016), I am a professional Appeals Specialist; within the Appeals Management division. I possess the academic credentials, licensure, certification, and skills that warrant my professional recognition.

The issues which has led to me loging this grievance concerns how departmental procedures are conducted.