Grievance Appeal Case Study

Summary: Guinn’s stated that trial court abused the discretion in objecting Dotson’s second amended complaint and rule on the motion to filing a certificate of merit late.

In your grievance filed at Buckley Unit, you claim you requested an Inmate Wells 187589 be added to your Do Not House With list and COIII Jones refused your request. Your resolution is to have your disciplinary ticket removed from your record and transfer you to Rast Unit.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. The Arizona Department of Corrections has entered into a contract with Century Link to provide telephone service for inmates and their families. The Century Link Company is complying with the terms of their contractual obligation with ADC. ADC inmates are not authorized to have internet access. Therefore, your proposed resolution is denied.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Contract Bed Bureau Administrator’s response is affirmed. You were removed from GED class due to your disruptive behavior which was witnessed by Instructor Perkowski.

I have reviewed your appeal dated September 1, 2015. In your complaint, you contend the percent required to serve should be 50% instead of 80% regarding St. Louis County Cause 11SL-CR08266 (Sequence 12) and St. Charles County Cause 1111-CR06523-01(Sequence 13). You contend the 2009 Long Term Treatment incarceration under Cycle 20071105 should not count as a commitment; however, because this is your second Long Term Treatment incarceration it does count as a prior commitment. You were received in the Missouri Department of Corrections on October 27, 1997, to serve your first Long Term Treatment commitment regarding St. Louis County Cause 97CR-000779A (Sequence 11) and 96CR-06039 (Sequence 12). Had you successfully completed the program and released

In your grievance filed at Red Rock, you claim staff confiscated photos from your incoming mail. You further assert, Department Order 914 does not prohibit photos of the female anatomy from a medical perspective. Your resolution is to receive and possess the photos.

Darlene submitted an appeal and grievance complaint to UnitedHealthcare and calls to check status. She is requesting a reimbursement for bills that were paid over the $4,900 limit of out-of-pocket expenses. Stephanie N., a D-SNP agent, needs to research Darlene’s complaint and provide her status. This lesson will guide you through the process.

In your grievance filed at Rincon Unit, you claim it is a health risk for you to be retrained when you leave your cell. You further assert that you have not displayed violent behavior towards anyone. Your resolution is to not be restrained when you leave your cell.

In your grievance filed at Browning Unit, you claim your release credits were taken after your scheduled parole certification was complete. You further assert that TCU did not forward your forfeiture packet within timeframes. You are requesting to have your ERCs restored.

I am AS – Appeals Specialist. When I noted the system as “AS 06/10/2016, CDM 120009. svc line: Orthopedics-pediatrics” they are cases that were entered prior to the system update that now includes the CDM and service line dropdowns. Thank you for deleting them. I would also like to share that there are cases when Edmund “piggybacks” my initial “AS” note with his explicit clinical/medical explanation. In the past, Ed and I had been asked to further explain, or clarify, the denial reason. I hope this clarifies the reason(s) for any

This letter is to let you know the answer to your grievance we received on 10/05/17, about the transportation services you received on 10/04/17. We looked at your grievance and want to let you know that Noel Medical Transportation, was contacted and advised of your dissatisfaction because you arrived at your appointment late.

In your grievance filed at Central Unit, you claim COIII Forman denied your request for a copy of the witness statement you turned in for your disciplinary hearing. You are requesting a copy of the witness statement.

San Francisco has another wrongful termination suit in the news. A worker from Madera named Jason Pimentel claims that he was the victim of wrongful termination. Pimentel filed his complaint on June 13th against Velex, Inc., Nexius Solutions, Inc. Included in the complaint are a number of alleged violations. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

This letter is to let you know the answer to your grievance we received on 09/25/17, about a missed transportation pick-up on 09/23/17. We looked at your grievance and want to let you know that the transportation provider, Joe Dread Enterprises, LLC, was contacted and advised of your complaint.

Explain the unforeseen and serious in nature barriers and/or problems that caused the lack of Satisfactory Academic Progress. Supporting documentation to substantiate the circumstances identified within your appeal should also be submitted if applicable.