I totally agree with your post and ideas but I wonder if the patient knew she was pregnant would she still feel the same way or would she want the fetus to be saved. Gross violation of autonomy and constitutional rights. It is one thing to allow a woman to die who has been determined brain-dead, but there is another person in her womb whose life depends on her staying alive for at least another few months. Somehow, I cannot say for sure, but somehow, I believe even she would prefer to be kept on life-support, if it meant her child would survive. Can you give me a link for this Texas law? I do not see how it does not contradict a whack of other laws and possibly the constitution. If this fetus manages to survive to term, I wonder if the husband
“Texas’s new strict legislation is already forcing women to leave the state in order to receive medical services in neighboring states more sympathetic to their desires to obtain an abortion (Hagle).” This is causing many problems for expectant mothers, especially those who have preexisting genetic medical conditions. Many time a mother may have some type of illness that can be given to a fetus during pregnancy. Sometimes these issues are seen during a routine ultrasound and sometimes there are not noticed until the time of birth. This is causing woman who live in the state of Texas to have to cross state lines when they find out something is wrong with their baby and choose to terminate the pregnancy.
In cases where the baby cannot survive outside of the mother and the mother’s health is in danger, the state has the right to protect the health of the mother and may regulate the procedure. The Justices debated over what should be the timeframe of when aborting can happen. Some suggested up till the point of viability, abortions can occur. others said at the end of the first trimester. However, both are ambiguous and arbitrary, so they proposed abandoning frameworks based on the age of the fetus and instead allowing states to regulate the procedure based on its safety for the
The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 was an extremely controversial and sensitive debate for most people, although it had a significant impact on women’s rights today. This case gave women the constitutional right and privacy in regards to making their own medical decisions with abortions. Before this case, the majority of states within the United States did not allow legal abortions to be carried out unless the mother’s life was in jeopardy. Within this paper, the background story of Roe v. Wade, ethical issues, the implications on current health care policies and laws, factors that prompted the United States Supreme court to make their decision, the consequences of this case, and the result of the 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the overturning of the Texas abortion restrictions will be further discussed.
"The State of Texas will be unable to fully implement HB 2's common sense regulations to protect the health and safety of women at substandard abortion facilities. Our work to protect mothers and unborn babies from abortion will continue."" In my opinion, abortion should not be legal. Abortion is in a way, murder. You are killing a human being without probable cause. Understood, that some people may not be able to take care of a kid; however, why would you risk a humans' life, instead of trying to find it a home. I am 100% against abortion, for that reason. One person will not even get the chance to live, for another individuals pleasure of not having the care for them. To conclude, I do not think it is right for people to kill a individual, when they didn't make they mistake; the individual carrying the baby however,
Unless we start talking about ethics and morality, the courts have the legal authority to interpret controversial issues (Devine, 1984). Therefore, the fetus should not be considered as a person protected by the constitution, and the constitutional rights to privacy and choice of the mother should be protected over the rights to life of the fetus.
Legislature has been debating over fetal rights for many years. Recently states have expanded this to include the issue of fetuses killed by violent acts against pregnant women. Some states have increased the criminal penalties
The death of a child is a hard thought to process. Think about the mothers of the unborn willing to give up a child of God to bear the thought of embarrassment or endangerment. Death is death no matter what angle it is looked upon. Abortion should be illegal anywhere in the United States in spite of the circumstances.
Many people claim that the mother should have a right to choose what happens to her own body, but this does not take into account that she is also choosing what happens to another person's body, even if it is not yet fully formed. On the other hand, the fetus is within her body and she produced it, she should have the right to terminate it as she does to remove any other part of her body.
(“Texas Abortion Laws and How They Compare Nationally”) While it is very important to have safety measures and precautions in place, some of those requirements as stated in the HB2 are unnecessary and could cause desperate women to turn to more dangerous methods to abort their child. (“5 Ugly Facts About the New Texas Abortion Bill”) One such policy is abortion clinics must be located within 30 miles of a hospital, which can cause clinics that may have been conveniently located or most easily accessible to be more difficult to access for those who live in less urban areas. (“5 Ugly Facts About the New Texas Abortion Bill”) Furthermore, the process has now been made lengthier, taking three days which, coupled with a greater travel distance creates a long, inconvenient, and costly procedure which is why there is a greater chance of women attempting abortion themselves through harmful methods that may end up harming the baby without successfully terminating the pregnancy. (“5 Ugly Facts About the New Texas Abortion Bill”) The shorter window of opportunity, from the previous 24 week limit to the now 20 week limit can also prevent the early termination of an unhealthy or abnormal fetus due to the fact that many of the tests run to check the health of the baby are
It is up to the family if they are willing to give up a child or the mother it is a life or death situation. An author states that “We made the difficult decision to let her go as peacefully as we could rather than watching her suffer through immeasurable pain before dying”(Hupprich,2016). She explains how it was hard to let go of the one thing she wanted most but you can't let the baby suffer though the conditions it was in.She had the right to choose, but she
Anyone that tries to persuade her to abort the baby is considered as a murderer to me too and should be arrested. The girl must make her own decision and that should be giving birth to the baby if she can or not. The quote, “Abortion is murder. Each abortion snuffs out an innocent human life. Tragically, doctors have deceived the American public.
Autonomy is the rights of patient to make decisions about medical care without their healthcare providers, family members or friends trying to impact their decision or make the decision without making an allowance for them to make their own choice. The main thing that should be done when faced with an ethical dilemma is pinpoint the problem. Although healthcare providers are allowed to educate the patient, the final decision comes from the patient. Even if a patient refuses medical treatment, the decision was made free from pressure or intimidation. There are different but related autonomy problems that take place in healthcare settings. This paper will discuss four different cases all related to decision making and the topics are: medical
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday, June 27, 2016 to end the restrictions on abortions in the state of Texas. Recently, the state passed a law that would require Abortion Clinics to have the same standards as Ambulatory Clinics in the state. This sounds entirely reasonable, considering the safety and well-being of the women who need to use an Abortion Clinic may, if under grave distress, need access to a more stable medical facility. However, due to the nature of the limitations and the many clinics that closed in the lapse of time this law went into effect in the state of Texas to the present day in which it was found unconstitutional women have needed to travel further for medical attention than cautiously safe and accessible. The issue for
There is a legitimate and significant difference between this case and typical abortion. In most cases of typical abortion, the mother chooses to abort the baby because she can’t take care of it. In this case, the mother can take care of it if she was healthy enough to have it, but in order to be healthy enough, she needs to receive chemo, but the chemo will kill the baby. The mother in this situation can’t control the outcome of this. The typical abortion mother can control the outcome. She can save the baby. She doesn’t have to choose whether to allow herself to die or the baby. She can have the baby adopted by a couple who wants it. There are other options then
Every human being is born with certain rights. These are protected by various charters and are considered inseparable from the human being. The reason for this is a belief that these rights create the fundamental and necessary conditions to lead a human life. Freedom of movement is one of these and has been recognised as such in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If a family finds themselves faced with starvation, the only chance they have of survival might be to move to another place where they might live another day. It is inhuman to condemn individuals to death and suffering for the benefit of some nebulous collective theory. While we might pass some of our freedoms to the state, we have a moral right to the freedoms