preview

Group Collaboration Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

GROUP COLLABORATION THESIS Most everyone knows how to work in a team but, not everyone comes from the same background or holds the same set of moral and ethical standards. Each person in a group has his or her own ideas about everything. When working in a group it seems that it is easy for a person to get lost in his or hers own task and forget about the group aspect of the project at hand. The article "Help Your Team Agree on how they'll Collaborate" gives the reader a solution to the group issue. The tool or advice that she gives is let the group agree on what the rules of conduct should be to help blend the group, thus making a smoother operating group with less conflict. The rules of conduct help the group know …show more content…

Whether that norm is something positive or negative within that group. Rules can be enforced by nonverbal actions like positive and negative attention from the leader of the group or other superiors. Integration seems to not be the only reason a group should adopt a universal set of rules, basically any time a group of people is brought together is a good reason. Coming up with this set of rules for the group to follow can be a long and exhausting process but there is a technique that can help this along. A method of using the nominal method of decision making would work best. Each individual person comes up with his or her set of rules, then as a group they review and pick the best top ten. After selecting the rules and the group becomes self-reliant after some time, or if the group backslides some, the group should come together and review the rules. At that point, they may adjust the rules to better fit the group as things and dynamics may have changed in the group. If there is a new team member he or she should be clued into the rules and allowed to give feedback. Theses suggestions can help a group work more efficiently together and become more …show more content…

The biggest thing that was emphasized was the group working together to come up with a set of rules that governs that group. When a team collectively comes up with its own rules and regulation there is less likely of a chance for conflict. If there is conflict the group potentially will be able to resolve it on its own. A method that is used is the nominal method of decision making. This means that each member comes to the meeting with his or her own set of rules and guidelines for the group. Each person reads the set of rules aloud, then as a group they vote on the top ten rules. Those top ten then are adopted by the group. It is important to periodically evaluate the rules, especially when and if the group back slides. This will help the group regain structure and focus on the task. I do not think that this approach will fit every group setting. I think that the process of setting ruled and guidelines for a group can be a lengthy process whether you do a pre-questionnaire or not. I think that the place where this can and will be the most effective is in a workplace where the employees are with the company for a long period of time. A place like Mc Donald's, where there

Get Access