Group Decision Making

Decision-making in the workforce is a process of responsibilities used by upper management to implement, enforce rules, regulations, and maintain a successful environment. Decision-making implemented more effectively by making a plan, thinking it through, accepting more than one opinion and determining what is best. However, decision-making often utilized more effectively by opening doors of opportunities for a suggestion, question, discussion, and feedback. Although, more involvement helps improve understanding, utilize behavior skills and present opportunities for better communication. Everyday life consists of decision-making, the right decision may not always be applied, but ensure room for improvement and opportunity. Individuals approached decision-making in many different ways. As stated by (Jones, Graham, & Bateman, 2006) decision making is a procedure used to recognize a problem, weigh the alternatives and evaluate a solution in which, certain situations will require different approaches to become effective.

Randy Hirokawa and Dennis Gouran developed the Functional Perspective on Group Decision Making theory to “offer practical advice on how participants can act to ensure better group decisions” (Hirokawa, 1999, p. 170). They believe that as long as the members in a group care about the issue and are reasonably intelligent, the group interaction will have a positive effect on the final decision. In order for a group to reach a high-quality solution, Hirokawa and Gouran believe the group 's decision-making process needs to fulfill four task requirements they refer to as requisite functions of effective decision making. "Three core assumptions define the functional perspective: (1) groups are goal oriented; (2) group performance varies in quality and quantity, and can be evaluated; and (3) internal and external factors influence group performance via the interaction process.” (Wittenbaum, 2004 p. 19).

17. Environments exist when decision makers lack complete certainty regarding the outcomes of various courses of action, but they are aware of the probabilities associated with their occurrence

To close the gap between actual and desired performance, decisions need to be made. Decision making involves making a selection from among alternative courses of action. Implementation and evaluation of the implementation provide feedback into the next cycle of group decision making.

3. Group think is a concept that involves individuals abandoning their critical senses and agreeing to group process even when they know it will have disastrous consequences. (Challenger disaster, Enron, Iraq war, etc.). Your will encounter these pressures in your work life and need to be prepared. Have you ever done something in a group that you would not have done if you were alone? What happened? How did you feel? What have you learned from this chapter that might help you avoid this behavior in the future, and avoid group think?

If meetings do not happen then issues come up and they are not resolved this may cause friction between staff and may cause the business to lose money and customers. It also makes the business much more organized and keeps the business innovative and relevant. This means these meeting may bring modern changes to the workplace for example going digital with systems and not just file pages of information. It is best to have staff meeting once a month or when required or when something happens and you need an answer urgently using a phone or video conference is the best way to get answers fast these are also examples of other meeting types. So, overall meetings need to happen and all staff need to attend and take them seriously. And there needs to be preparation prior to the meeting to make it a

Decision making is affected by the Group Think because of the lack of openness that should be displayed and offered by everyone involved. The development of the organization is dependent on the ability of the group to make decisions that are thought through and not made solely on pressures and accepted or narrow minded ways that are not thought out.

According to the text, Dr. Alex Mahdi was committed to the idea of collaborative decision making. However, Dr. Mahdi utilized an individual and authoritative decision leadership style when he set up committees and appointed teachers to serve on his newly established committees in addition to their department level committees. I believe Dr. Mahdi has the resources necessary for success. He has the opportunity to boost morale, change the culture and climate of the school, and build trust worthy relationships through collaborative interaction.

A decision is “a conscious choice of an alternative from a set of several others”. A person has the option to choose from different alternatives when making a decision. After a person makes a decision, he/she needs to evaluate it, analyses it and sees the outcomes. There are two types of decision making process; first, no-programmed decision making that refers to things a person has not done before, such as buying a car or a house. The second decision making process is programmed that involves things that we do on a daily basis such as eating or showering. In addition, group decision making involves brainstorming which is a way of collecting different ideas in order to take the best alternative to make a decision; then, consensus is

2 When ________ is of importance in decision making, group decisions are preferred to individual decisions.

The article Titled “partners in care: patient empowerment through shared decision-making, Written by Debra J. Hain and Dianne Dandy explores the benefits of shared disciomne making and having a patient- provider partnership. Although the authors specifically mention a patient with chrinoch Kidiney diese and talks about how this helps nurses and their patients in the Nephrology specialty I believed that the subjects talked about in this article can be used by any nurse. Our patient MR.G has a diagnosis of powerlessness relating to the dependence on others and because of this we knew he needed to gain some control back. This is why we decided to aprroce him with the topic of going to a support group but we did not want to just

It is observed that Team managers within the Software Solutions team decide and then sell the decision to the team members while the team managers within the Technology Solutions team allow more the team to identify the problem, develop the options, and decide on the action within the manager’s received limits.

I do not think a leader can maintain a personal friendship with some member of his or her group or team without creating the perception of an in-group. By creating a personal friendship, the leader will get to spend time with this person outside work; by doing so, they leader gets to know this member at a much deeper level than the other member. They get to know how they think, how they act and behave. In addition, the member becomes more trustworthy of the leader, including their judgment. In-group members are invited to participate in decision making and giving more responsibilities, whereas out-group member are managed according to the requirements of the contract that was signed. In-groups also more often achieve higher performance, commitment and job satisfaction that out-groups.

The decision is to select an action among a number of actions that solves a given problem, that prevents a problem from happening, or that forces to apply new ideas for development. The need for understanding decision making process is increasing because the complexity of modern organizations is increasing, and because the modern organizations' effectiveness depends on the decisions made by the managers. The question is how to select the most appropriate action to solve the problem satisfying all stakeholders.

Let?s define what is Group Decision Making, decisions made by committees, think tanks, teams and groups. They may include borrowers, lenders, producers, buyers, scientists and other experts, environmentalists, and real estate developers and so on.