Guerilla Open Access Manifesto Essay

At times it is necessary to break the law for justice to prevail.The quote “You want me to go to prison for nothing just so the Wisharts can say goodbye properly?..I’m

Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Google said, “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” The quote shows modern society well. Living in 21th century is like living in a glass box. We are living in society that needs only a few clicks to get information of others.

"One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws." Martin Luther King's words, which just correspond with the above assertion, perfectly tell us what to do in face of laws, either just or unjust.

Make the law of the country and they have power to pass the law and change them.

The categories used to describe the words of the Unabomber Manifesto gave us a greater understanding of the context with which we were studying. We decided that grouping the words into concepts of positivity, negativity, power or any other category based on the words we believed would assist in organizing it. We aimed to interpret if there was a deeper meaning to such words as we all chose them for a reason. To illustrate, when we saw words related to technology such as cameras and computers, we noticed that both collect information and process it. Giving extensive thought to these words gave them depth and whenever we saw these words again, we remembered what we associated them with originally. In terms of giving words meaning and association,

In an ideal society, there would be equal protection under the law in this diverse America. However, other factors get in the way and Lady Justice is not always blind. Poor judgment of a few individuals can lead the

Wesley Yang complicates Tomar's argument in his piece, The Life and Afterlife of Aaron Swartz, by stating that without locking away articles behind a pay-wall, there would be no economic incentive for those knowledgeable in their fields to continue producing papers (Yang 6). While JSTOR and MIT considered it to be a crime and unethical to release the academic documents, Swartz's supporters claimed that “no harm had come of it... taking copies of JSTOR's archive left JSTOR with perfect copies of its own” (Yang

Another week, another series of patches to download from Microsoft. It seems like every week, Microsoft is under siege from one virus or another. The complexity in the billions of lines of code embedded in its products make it impossible to be error-free. If it is this easy for hot-headed M$ haters to breach the world’s largest software maker, one has to ask: how hard would it be to expose vulnerabilities in the most sophisticated and technologically dependent country in the world?

Although much has changed in the United States over the past 60 years, this country’s legal system has failed at providing justice for all people.

them is an injustice. There are three courts that they have to go through to get justice; the trial

However, not all cases receive the luxury we call justice. Many cases have been turned over and neglected, leaving individuals who patiently await their trial date deprived of justice. Injustice in the judicial system has been an apparent problem for decades. Every case has to be viewed in an unbiased perspective with a sufficient amount of evidence. If these conditions are not met, the possibility for injustice increases drastically.

Today’s society has one of the worst justice systems, everytime you go on the news you hear all about the unjust things the justice system does. Now with recent news such as the Baltimore incident,

*Justice is a lovely thought. We all would like to think it is this great and powerful force that protects us. In reality, when it comes time for justice to work for me or for you, we will have to cross our fingers, hope for some old fashioned good luck and pray that the people involved making decisions on our behalf will not screw up. Justice is intimidating and often unreliable. It is unreliable because it is administered by people. People make mistakes.

Piracy in the Golden Age devastated the trade economy. Hundreds of ships carrying numerous amounts of goods were plundered. Today, piracy hardly dents the two trillion dollar a year shipping industry. In 1997 losses amounted to “$.32 for every $10,000” J. Gottschalk. This leaves little financial incentive for companies to deal with the problem.

At present, stealing comprises a much broader kinds of activities than it used to; it would be enough to remember shop-lifting or numerous facts of counterfeit product utilization when intellectual property is stolen against copyright-based laws and regulations. Stealing, therefore, is expanding and spreading; moreover, the very notion of what is stealing becomes modified and fuzzy. What are then the instruments that the consequential approach