The SAU teaching domains that are addressed with the Guided Reading Lesson (GRL) are content knowledge and classroom management. This was created in EDU 350- Teaching English and Language Arts on March 26, 2017.
The GRL was specifically crafted for three struggling third grade readers. The first part focused around the /oi/ sound, and the second was dedicated to determining the problem and solution within a story.
This lesson is closely tied to content knowledge, because the students participated in activities that helped them practice spelling words with the /oi/ sound. They also read Toys for Boys, which contained many words with /oi/. While reading, they were looking for the problems and solutions within the story. This lesson also addresses
It is the limited range of host cells that each type of virus can infect and parasite.
In Chapter 8 in The Best Practices in literacy Instruction, Gambrell expresses the role of Phonemic awareness, syllabic decoding, and developing strategies. Although there is not a best way to teach decoding to students, there’s a need to develop and strength their ability to decode and to teach phonics. She provides excellent examples of ways to teach rhyming (page 174) and phonic awareness (page 175). Phonics plays a vital role in the academic success of all students.
The following essay takes a look at both sides of the comparison between, “Encouraging Learning,” by Hsun Tzu, and “Learning to Read,” by Fredrick Douglas. These textbooks have significance both in the connection between philosophy, and the linkage between knowledge and freedom. Although these texts have their similarities and differences, it is without a doubt that they both possess the Seven Elements of Critical Thinking. Nonetheless, my goal in this paper is to not only introduce to you my comparisons between Encouraging Learning, and Learning to Read, but also make important connections while doing so. Firstly, I will introduce Hsun Tzu, a Chinese philosopher and a follower of Confucius.
This chapter focuses on the versatility of the ELL within our classrooms. There are a couple points that are highlighted within the article, but the main focus seemed to be around assessment of the student and the instruction. Those were two components that defined how the student would be instructed to get the best outcome for improvement in English proficiency in literature and language. Although each ELL student has their own unique pattern, they may align with a general profile characteristic, which can lead the teacher in the general direction that will hopefully best fit the need of that student. Then the instruction process is just as tedious as the assessment, but is necessary for the student to continue advancing within their classes.
Teachers should use leveled readers and different kinds of texts with students. The teachers should make sure to give background information about the books the students will read. This will help students to understand what they read. In groups, teachers should listen to the students and write down observations about what the students do as they read. There are eight points to the Fountas and Pinnell guided reading program. The first point is for teachers to use high, quality text for reading comprehension. Teachers need to use quality texts that are able to spiral in understanding for students. Teachers should model and give explicit teaching when doing guided reading groups. Teachers can help teach vocabulary through guided reading, which extends to other parts of the academic curriculum. Guided reading should include phonics instruction, concepts of print, and fluency guidance. This program should also include writing and helping students’ development proper writing habits. The lessons should be engaging to students and encourage good reading habits. Guided reading is a program that allows teachers to work one-on-one with students while in a small group. Teachers are able to help students with what they need in order to understand
Guided Reading is a component of a balanced literacy program providing differentiated, small group reading instruction to four to six students with
315-317) was used throughout the lesson in order to give the students an example of how to use the strategies that were taught. Before children would work on assignments alone, the teacher would model exactly what is expected of them, and keep examples of what was modeled during the lesson so the students could look back to it if they need to. Read-alouds (Cooper, 2015, p. 37) were used in this lesson to really help children to focus on certain topics of the text. “Sometimes the best way to help children understand a particular piece of text is to read it aloud to them and discuss it with them” (Cooper, 2015, p. 37). Think-alouds (Cooper, 2015, p. 30) were incorporated into this lesson when trying to explain how to use the strategy of character mapping. Think-alouds are a great way to explain to students how to use a specific skill or strategy so that they can have a better time comprehending it. Semantic maps (Cooper, 2015, p.83) were used in this lesson for brainstorming ideas from the text to later reference when making illustrations and creating short responses to the text. This strategy is also a great tool for second-language-learners because it helps to narrow down the specific parts in the text to help create more details of the topic being taught. Cooperative “popcorn” sequencing(Annenburg Learner, 2015) was used in the lesson to allow a variety of students to participate in the
The small group lesson will be modeled for four students, with specific targeted instruction for the two students previously mentioned. Both students are reading at a DRA level of 10 and 12 respectively, which is aligned with the expectation of the beginning of second grade. While fluency appears to be a challenge for both students, comprehension becomes more difficult as texts become more challenging. This lesson
This course has provided a window into the resources and strategies available to create rich instruction for diverse needs of all literacy learners. The media segments and virtual field experiences provided models of the strategies and activities being conducted in the classroom. This was very helpful in implementing my own versions of those lessons with my literacy learner and completing the literacy development study. I believe this course has prepared me to be a more efficient educator when teaching students of diverse reading abilities. I plan to continue using my newfound knowledge and skills to create an enriching learning environment for all students in my classroom.
Whether the task is understanding mathematical word problems, analyzing research articles in science, or summarizing instructions from a shop class manual, it is self-evident that learning cannot occur independently of reading. Furthermore, Trelease cites the 1983 Department of Education report, which reads, “The single most important activity for building the knowledge required for eventual success in reading is reading aloud to children,” (Trelease, The Read-Aloud Handbook, 2013, p. 1). From an evidentiary standpoint, this report draws credibility from a compilation of twenty five years’ worth of research projects and is given its authority because of its connection to the Board of Education. On the same token, Trelease introduces findings from another report, this time from doctors Hart and Risely at the University of Kansas. In short, their findings strongly correlated the volume of words heard at home to student success at school (Trelease, The Read-Aloud Handbook, 2013, p. 2). When the students heard fewer words at home, students were less successful; inversely, when students heard more words at home, students were more successful. In conclusion, Trelease’s ultimate supposition rests on these conclusions: literacy is extremely valuable in general education, while reading aloud is crucial to developing
Explain the Simple View of Reading and its applications for teaching in relation to your SE1 context, with particular reference to strategies for teaching and assessing reading.
The situation amongst ELLs and literacy instruction, including assessment practices, is confusing for many teachers; therefore there is still much exploration left in terms of the best practices for the instruction and assessment of ELLs (Ebe, 2010).
My goal was 640 pages. My independent reading was lacking. This quarter I have managed a whopping 160 pages. I am taking four college classes this semester, all of which was very demanding in the reading part. I am a procrastinator, but I feel like I am taking great steps toward not being such a procrastinator. I make sure to include time to complete the reading in all my classes in my busy schedule.
Guided reading is something that I found interesting that I would incorporate in a classroom. The first step, as the book states, is the teacher picking materials for their students to read. The teacher needs to make sure that they give each student a copy of the grade appropriate material. When the students are in the beginning stage of reading the teacher introduces new concepts/ vocabulary. This will help the students when they begin reading the material. Once the teacher has gone through the new concepts/vocabulary they let the students read the material. When the students are reading the teacher show keep I eye out for any students struggling with the material or for students that might have a question. The final stage of guided reading
Based on my experience teaching for the first time a close reading activity I find that responding critically to a text is important because it lets you know more of the reading than event in a text. As a student, I did not like to read and I am guessing is because I was not taught effective reading strategies that could help me improve my reading comprehension and really understand the meaning behind the words of book.