Gun Control And The Second Amendment

Another solution is to redesign the background checks on every individual wanting to purchase a gun. Each state has their own law on this one and many are not very strict. By creating a national background checking system for everyone trying to purchase guns which would include a national mental health check; guns entering the hands of an individual mentally unstable could be prevented better. Thirdly, designing tougher sentencing laws could aid in lowering crimes involving guns. Totally removing guns would not be beneficial because the criminals are still going to find a way to have a gun in order to continue their criminal lifestyle. The key to finding the perfect solution is tough due to many loopholes and the effects it could have on everyone’s second amendment right. In looking at the three potential ways to control guns and violence; the perfect way to aid in controlling guns and the violence is to put in place a law that contains tougher sentences, more in depth background checks, a large database to account for every gun purchased or sold and require every gun owner to go through a course to teach gun safety and the laws that are in place.

In the Second Amendment, it gives people the right to bear firearms. This means that most people can own a gun legally and use it how they want. Some can use them for hunting, target practice, defense, or for a collection. As of now most people can go to a gun store, maybe pass a background check, fill out some papers, and come back with a weapon. If you buy it elsewhere, you might not have to pass or sign anything.

The Second Amendment states that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The way the Supreme Court interprets this amendment changes constantly because not even the Supreme Court fully understands the limits and rights given to citizens. Some argue that this amendment protects our right to own a gun, but is not very clear. Over the years the second amendment has become a huge debate over gun rights and gun control. This is a cause of all the gun violence this country has been facing for many years and they need a way to help prevent gun violence or even suppress the amount of deaths faced by these tragedies. One of the ways this

The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in today’s society. There are commonly two sides that fight with each other over the definition of this amendment. The pro-gun, or what is commonly referred to as “gun nuts”, have the firm belief that the American people have the right to not only carry a gun, but to carry any type of gun that they want, while anti-gun groups want to get rid of the right to carry a gun all together unless that person is a soldier or police officer.

President Barack Obama says we have an “obligation” to try anything that could save one child, but many people find this statement to be ridiculous. Gun control is thought of as a government policy or regulations to control or limit the sale and use of firearms. In the U.S. constitution, the 2nd Amendment states that a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Inside America today, gun control is a major issue, especially in the political arena. People debate on the daily that not all things in society make it a safer place to live. The best intentions of America’s lawmakers often do not achieve the desired outcome; therefore, the nation

Should more gun control laws be intact? Gun control is a very controversial topic with people saying that more gun control laws should be intact and many people saying that there shouldn’t be gun control laws, both sides have valid points and are debated intensely all over America. It has seemingly came back up as a intensely debated topic due to a new bill in place to let concealed carrier carry their guns pretty much anywhere with few restrictions. It also seems to be one of the most ongoing political topics for the last two decades. Gun control laws should not be intact. People need to be able to protect themselves and should feel safe in their own home. People should also be allowed to have guns for hunting and for sport.

be set off by being hit by a rock, a nail, or being thrown into the

Guns have been around for a very long time. People love being able to have the freedom to do what they want, especially when they can possess something that make them feel superior. The introduction of the Second Amendment opens up the controversial, yet well anticipated opportunity for United State citizens to be able to own guns. Americans enjoy the benefit of being able to own guns for decades over people in other countries. People can buy guns and carry them around in public. They own guns for many reasons such as to hunt, to protect themselves, and simply to satisfy their desire of owning a gun, but in recent years, the issue of people carry guns has become a problem. There are so many people get killed by guns in different parts of

The second Amendment to the Constitution, which concern is the rights to bear arms, has always been a hot-button issue, especially during election season. In the United States, the ability to choose whether or not to own a gun means favoring or opposing the right and the legislation restricting rights that come with it. For years, gun rights and gun control groups alike have been lobbying Congress for decades to sway legislation to their respective favors. The question then become, should the United States have more control over guns? The issue of guns in America should remain in the hands of the citizens because it helps people feel more safe and they help prevent people from becoming victims of crime.

Over the past 20 years, a culmination of events has caused quite a stir in the United States. These events, which consist mostly of homicide on a mass scale, have caused a massive debate over our second amendment rights. Some people feel as if citizens’ rights pertaining to firearms need to be redefined to cater to the growing variety of weapons; while others feel as if such changes would infringe upon their rights as a citizen of the United States. While many people have a very strong opinion pertaining to the gun debate, others do not; the media plays a big role in influencing the undecided audience to one side or the other. When journalists discuss the gun debate, they use a wide variety of rhetorical devices to communicate their perspectives. The most common of these devices includes statistics, the subject of safety, persuasive language, and tone.

The research that I conducted this semester focused on the Second Amendment and whether or not it should eliminate. Essay one, "The Rights to Bear Arms" explains citizens have the right to rebel against a tyrannical government by using guns for self-defense, and the gun owner shouldn 't deprive of something they love because other people abuse it. Essay two “Gun control” argue that the Second Amendment should eliminate because it increased the potential for crimes and the number of accidental gun deaths, creates an unsafe environment, and legally owned guns are frequently stolen and used by criminals. Although both essays relied on academic research, they are not concise enough to the point and confuse the reader.

I am writing this letter in concern of the second amendment; discussing gun laws. The Bill of Rights states that, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun violence unfortunately has become timeless and is at an all-time high in America. Many people take advantage of guns using and manipulating the tool with hardly any thought. Countless lives have been lost due to fact that people have been able to obtain firearms legally or illegally and have taken the notion to be judge, jury and executioner in holding ones live in their hands. This is a common issue that will continue if action is not taken as a nation to try and stop it. Gun violence can lead many citizens to believe that no place is deemed safe anymore and recent tragedies that have taken place in United States holds up that statement. In our society today, the shootings that continue to take place seem to become more gruesome and far more heinous, becoming more painful and unbearable to listen, watch, and hear these tragic stories appear on the news. The government, parents, and educators have now combined forces and are struggling to find a way forward towards dealing with the matter adequately. Back in the day, most people believed gun violence only took place in the inner cities, but currently the epidemic has reached the suburbs and rural America. This epidemic has hit grade schools, high schools, school’s yards of inner-city schools and college campuses. Most times school shootings make the national press while threats to schools are not reported on the news as much. However, this has happened partly because of the irresponsibility of the citizens. Furthermore, due to this amendment, many terrorist attacks have occurred, many people have accidently gotten injured, and school shootings have occurred.

““This whole law was written on the backs of children who didn’t die,” he said.”1 Gun Control is a very controversial topic being discussed. Those against new gun control laws have a lot of reasons; however they have one main argument which is the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Gun control is one of the leading factors that go into a campaign. More rules and regulations are not always the answer. There are many examples of places where they have strict rules on the purchase of firearms or even no firearms at all and guns are still used for violence. Foreign countries do not help us here either. The United States gets much criticism from many other countries even though they are not doing much better. However no matter what they say it does nothing to keep people from buying guns for self-defense. Some people are talking about self-defense who is against, and those who support these laws are calling them common sense. These are a few of the reasons for there to be a decrease in gun control; however these are a few of the main arguments.

The right to bear arms has been cherished by many Americans whom possess firearms. Over time, these guns have been the cause of many murders and social issues. Since 1934, there have been regulations which have created a safer society. This has also caused some sort of controversy among society due to the belief of whether or not this has caused some violation towards their civil rights. Although it has been proven that background checks is an insufficient piece of evidence for not giving someone a gun, the government should still require background checks to purchase ammunition and prohibit the possession of large capacity ammunition magazines because it does not violate the Second Amendment, decreases rates of mass murder, and makes the ability to possess arms more difficult than it is now.

Gun control has, over the years, become a hot topic for debate. For both sides, there are many reasons to be for or against the banning of certain guns. Even throughout our country’s political history, presidents and politicians have tried to ban or even merely control the amount or type of guns available to the public. Two articles, Treasure the Second Amendment, But Ban Assault Rifles by Judith Miller and A Ban on Assault Rifles Would Not Reduce Crime by Noёl Merino, address both sides of this emotionally charged issue. Both arguments hold a strong grasp on the issue and show their opinions in a respectful yet moving manner that gives a good foundation to leave their audiences room to have their own thought on the subject. While both hold their own in their respective articles, Merino gives a more factual and detached argument that shows well-rounded thought and an ability to see reprimands and consequences for the ban on assault rifles. On the other hand, Miller gives insight into the emotional impact that the ownership of assault rifles as a common household item gives to the fear ridden citizen. While neither article will be an end all be all for this issue, they both shed a light on how the opposing sides view guns and the potential outcomes of either the destruction of the assault rifle industry or allowing the industry to its own will. Whether or not the people read these articles, gun control will be a hot-button issue for years to come as the argument for and