Gun Control Arguments

Gun control is a particularly sensitive issue in the U.S. a truth that most other first-world countries find boundless. Regardless of a rash of prominent various killings in the previous a few years, most Americans stay antagonistic to any further confinements on gun control. It is broadly trusted that groups are more secure where residents are allowed to buy weapons to shield themselves. Among U.S. presidential contenders, Hillary Clinton remains solitary in hostility that entrance to gun control is out of parity. Interestingly, most Republican contenders are solidly against gun control. Ted Cruz, overlooking the proof, says, "On the off chance that you take a gander at the purviews with the strictest weapon control laws, just about no matter what, they have the most elevated crime rates and the

The article was originally published in 2013, a year after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, which was a mass shooting that killed 20 children and six adults. This tragedy leads to high concerns about what can possibly be done to prevent this from happening again. Although gun control debates have been occurring for centuries, in recent debates they have become even more heated due to the many incidents of gun violence. In Simon’s article, she brought more tension and views to help delegate what needs to be done to stop the violence in the country rather than leave it

Taya Kyle, the author of the article “American Sniper Widow: Gun Control Won’t Protect Us”, believes that there are two sides of the argument on gun control. People can use statistics, facts, and real life examples to argue that there should be stricter control of guns in the US, but they cannot eliminate the emotional side of the story. While in the last two decades, violent crime rates have actually been reduced in the US, fears have gone up. Anyone can be a victim of a violent crime because if another person decides to do harm, they will do it under any circumstances.

Dorothy Samuels’ view on gun control is illustrated in a handful of ways in the article “Wrong on Gun Rights”. Her first important point informs and educates her audience of the hazards of courts permitting second amendment rights as well as revoking bans on guns. This point was also used to mention and elaborate on lawsuits involving the misuse of guns, which were handled by the courts. Another significant point Samuels made was that US citizens should be advised of the way our government

Slowly and steadily stealing into our lives like a shadowy hoard from the burning bowels of the earth, the fiery debate on gun control threatens to rend our country in two. Both sides often point deadly fingers at motives and character instead of arguments. Beliefs, founded and unfounded, range widely across the board. On one side of this treacherous issue, Mark Follman penned an article for Mother Jones titled “More Guns, More Mass Shootings – Coincidence?” in an attempt to destroy the pro-gun position. However, because he based upon a flawed worldview and some faulty logic, Follman comes to incorrect conclusions.

The issue over the interpretation of the Second Amendment still prevails as one of the most controversial issues in the United States. The Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The question at hand is the proper definition of a “well-regulated militia” and should there be restrictions on the obtainment of lethal weapons. Ever since the year of 1960, gun violence has increased, costing an average of 30,000 deaths in the United States (Gun Violence is a Serious Problem). This astronomical amount of unnecessary deaths will continue to rise if nothing is done to stop the serious epidemic that continues to plague our

Molly Ivins expresses her views on guns in her essay, “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns”, in which she feels guns are only needed for Military and Law Enforcement; the way she explains her opinions give little credibility due to slippery slope, non sequitur, hasty generalization, and ad hominem.

So gun control is a very sensitive subject at this part of time, but it really does need to be talked about. Many people have their opinions on the topic and these opinions start lots of drama, if you want to call it that.Through this essay tho we will be talking about if gun control is really need or is it something else.

First, I believe that how guns are used is up to the person holding it. Guns can't do anything by themselves, it is the person who has the gun that decides where it shoots. Gun control will not stop or help to prevent violence; an aggressive person does not need a gun to be violent, there are many other ways for one person to hurt another person. Taking guns away from all people will not make the violent ones less violent. It may even make them more violent than they already are. Violent people will always find a way to be violent. Taking guns away from everyone does nothing to prevent people from the possibility of being hurt, robbed, and killed by others. I believe that gun control will not last as we have already had something similar to

As an opponent of gun control I feel like taking away guns from civilians to try and ease the mind of the rest of the population won’t work because disarming a law-abiding citizen won’t disarm the criminal waiting for a chance to hurt, rob, or kill someone because they know they can’t protect themselves because their weapons were taken away. Gun laws don’t need to be changed to stop murders and theft to effectively fix the way we look at guns we as people need to change our attitude towards each other as humans because we promote violence and death in so many ways, we see violence in movies, TV shows. In some states we promote and legalized assisted suicide, as Kentucky Governor talked about his view on gun-control he said “you can’t regulate evil” as a response to the school shooting that happened in Kentucky which was days before the school shooting in Parkland, during a talk with news reporters on the subject he briefly talked about how guns are not the issue, he said we as a culture need to change the way we look at each other as people and reshape the way we look at death and violence in different ways and try to and change how much people view death whether it is on a movie, TV show, a video game , or something we see on social media every day because we promote violence that when a fight or any sort of violent act happens people would rather pull out their phone and record than call the police and try to interfere with the activity that’s going

Nowadays streets are scary to walk alone at night. Crime rates have increased currently and people are nervous to leave their own homes at night. Sadly, unlike cartoons, there is no hero that is going to swoop in and save the day. Imagine you were sitting in your parked car next to dark streets, lit up only by a dim lamp-pole. You see a man walking slowly with his head down and he starts walking towards your car. He taps on the window. In this moment, wouldn’t you want to be able to protect yourself? You don’t know what this man is capable of or what his intent is. When you roll down your window to ask what he wants, he pulls out a gun. If you were weaponless, there would be a high possibility that you would not survive. Imagine this instead. As he pulls out his gun

This led me to using just the search engine itself to find my sources. One thing I found very quickly, was that many of the articles said the same thing on both sides. Right-wing articles boasted stories of “I used to be a gun control advocate but then I realized…” while left-wing articles somewhat villainized gun owners. Regarding which articles I chose and which I didn’t came down to whether or not it supported my opinion and if it had the supporting numbers. I am someone who believes firmly in statistics. The articles I chose had the numbers to show why gun control was useful and how it has worked in other countries. In forming my opinion, I have found that this is something right-wing arguments lack. To prove your argument you better be able to show me the numbers behind it that prove it and in the case of gun control pro-gun advocates seem ignorant on the states and countries that have imposed stricter gun laws and consequently seen less gun related deaths.

Friends, family or acquaintances are perished everyday due to ruthless killers. What interested me the most about this article is how a "mother" can get the courage to kill her own daughters. This is shocking to me because the woman just killed her daughters like it was nothing, she forgot that she carried them for 9 months and raised them to be the best that they could. The recent controversy on gun laws have also intrigued me to read this article. There are shootings and deaths happening every week, and something has to be done. I stand by the Second Amendment; I believe that people should have the right to bear arms, but I also believe that there should be stricter gun laws. This was a terrible day for friends and families of Madison and

The truth is that people kill people, and a gun is just a gun that is used by people as a weapon. A gunshot involves movement and action to pull that trigger. When people say that gun control is good because guns are only made to kill, then why do they not question the people who pull that gun’s trigger. What would happen if instead of guns being banned, criminals were banned since they are the ones who commit the crimes? People who support gun control might say that gun control can help lower deaths, lower crimes, and most importantly save the innocent children and families. This, however, is false because gun control does not “save” or “protect” anyone, in fact, it might only end up harming people. Places that do not have gun control are

Gun control is not needed, education about guns and gun safety is needed to prevent accidental gun deaths ( “Top pro and con argument”). Learning about gun will keep other safe because gun don’t kill people, people kill people. Gun are not harmful if people use it the right way. Gun control should not be supported because it will not reduce lethal crime, reduce school violence, and reduce suicide.