Gun Control Dbq

This paper discusses and is centered around the on-going debate over gun control, I directly address how each major political party views this subject and what I believe the United States Government should do to be able to best combat this tremendous issue. I use research from multiple sources that contrast each side of the argument and give an overall insight into the world of modernized gun control.

“What is going on with gun control?” you may ask. Or even, “What does gun control even mean?” President Barack Obama wants to enforce stricter gun rules. “His proposals focus on new background check requirements that will enhance the effectiveness of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), and greater education and enforcement efforts of existing laws at

Across the United States there have been many shootings and attacks. The most recent being in San Bernardino California where 14 innocent lives were taken. Most of these shootings are in schools, state buildings, movie theatres etc. Every public mass shooting in the USA since 1950 has taken place where citizens are banned from carrying guns. There are ways to end these people going on killing sprees once and for all. Many law abiding citizens are experienced and comfortable with a firearm. Imagine these people being able to take their concealed weapons into places that are now “no gun zones”. This would act as a deterrent against the people who go on killing sprees. At the least, law abiding citizens

First to be discussed on President Obama’s gun control plan is to require anyone wanting to purchase a gun to comply with a National Background Check System created by Brady Act. Why? You may want to ask must we require a background check for all gun sales. The answer is while most people wanting to purchase a gun will be responsible with it while they enjoy hunting or shooting as a sport and while others want a gun for personal protection, however, there are people in this country that don’t need a gun or is prohibited from having a gun either because they have a mental illness that makes having a gun unsafe or they have been convicted of a felony or domestic violence either way want people in control of a gun to use it responsibly and not used it for

Chetana: Hello and welcome to the Chetana Show! Today we’re going to be talking about an important and controversial topic...gun control. Over the past decade in America, more than 100,000 people have been killed as a result of gun violence—and millions more have been the victim of assaults, robberies, and other crimes involving a gun. Many of these crimes were committed by people who never should have been able to purchase a gun in the first place. The vast majority of Americans—including gun owners—believe we must take sensible steps to address these horrible tragedies. Gun control is a serious issue especially in today’s society and today we will be having a debate between some supporters and non supporters of gun control. We have some

More gun control means fewer deaths and crimes. Gun control in California is already very strict, but not strict enough. There are many reasons as to why gun control in California should be even stricter. First of all, there are many people out there with mental problems that already own a firearm. If the law were to become stricter, they would have more processing to rule out the mentally unstable from owning any type of firearm. Anyone taking any anti-depressants should automatically be disqualified. There is a good chance that it would most likely, reduce shootings, massacres, suicides, and all other types of incidents that have happened these past couple of years. Most of the past massive shootings are committed by people with mental instability. Secondly, the state should really enforce a very strict background check. Anybody who has a criminal or gang related background should automatically be disqualified from obtaining any type of firearm. Anybody with a violent record should also be disqualified. Lastly, California should make gun control stricter because stricter gun control would mean less crime and a safer state.

In Hitler’s Table Talk, 1941-1944: His Private Conversations, Adolf Hitler was recorded as stating “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty” (Hitler, Cameron, Stevens, Trevor-Roper, 2000). The matter of gun control in America has long since been a rather controversial issue, with individuals on the left and right passionately voicing their opinions for their cause. Gail Collins and Michael A. Schwartz both address the matter of gun control in their respective New York Times and San Diego Union Tribune opinion articles, but they each do so in drastically dissimilar approaches.

One of the largest issues being discussed today is how can we effectively control guns and limit, or eliminate, gun violence. There is a very large amount of solutions out there, some that are good and some that are not so good. The solutions I have found and will discuss in this paper have been proposed by Todd Miller of Huffington Post, Evan DeFilipps of Washington Post, and Matthew DesChamps of Stamford Advocate. The solutions these authors have proposed just do not solve this issue in the right way, or without creating another issue. After discussing why their proposals will not get the job done, I will offer my solution. I believe that my solution to gun control is the most effective way to control and limit gun related violence while still protecting the rights given by the 2nd Amendment.

Gun control refers to the regulation of the manufacture, selling, owning or use of guns or firearms. That has been a very controversial debate, with one side saying that there should be no gun control at all because it leads to crime and accidents, while on the other hand, other people claim that one should be allowed to own a gun if they can afford, for their safety. There have been various incidents of accidents, and others have even led to death. However, the debate remains the same.

The truth is, violent crimes in America are often very high, but in reality property crimes happen more. In the nine year olds case, the gun wasn’t properly put away, causing the tragic incident. Personally, I think if an individual has taken appropriate courses for owning a gun, have had a background check, and seem stable then it is fine for them to own a gun. Guns should be used for protection, hunting for food during the appropriate season, and used at a gun range where safe objects are the target. I have many friends who responsibly own guns and only use them when appropriate. However, if someone has purposefully committed a gun crime before, they shouldn’t be allowed a gun. This may seem unfair to some people but its only for America’s safety. Also, a person should be at least 21 to own a gun. If a person shooting a gun at a gun range is underage, they need to be accompanied by an adult with a license to carry.

Obama’s proposals function on one of the oldest, fundamental goals of government: to provide order and security to those governed. By requiring universal background checks, those deemed “unfit” to possess a firearm would not legally have a way to buy one and therefore the severity of the situation, should one of these individuals act on any rash thoughts, would be greatly reduced. The same would be true if individuals who were able to possess firearms were only able to have ones of a less ridiculous nature and with less ammunition to carry out any homicidal intentions. The right to ban these “dangerous and unusual weapons” has already been ruled by the Supreme Court in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller to be in accordance with the Constitution. In 1994, two laws were passed which did these two things. However, due to loopholes, they were less effective than intended. Even still, statistical information shows that since the year they were passed, there has been a steady

BANG! With one shot, a person’s life can be taken away without preface or reason. All someone needs to do is pull the trigger. In today’s world, guns are far too accessible to the people of society. We hear in the news, stories of mass shootings, homicides, and suicides; most of which are caused by the activation of a gun. A hot-button issue, gun control is one of the most debated topics in American politics. Should we, or should we not, be able to own guns? Although it infringes on the Second Amendment that provides the right to bear arms, this amendment has been misinterpreted and does not apply to the nature and needs of society in today’s world. While it may seem true that more guns would offer more protection, this is not the case, and in reality, facilitates more violence; therefore, the government needs to restrict who is allowed to buy guns, the types of guns they can have, and the amount that can be purchased. Unless separately granted by the government, civilians should not be able to obtain and possess guns for purposes other than sport or recreation, because of its promotion of violence, and its potential to land in irresponsible hands and kill innocent people.

It states that having a concealed handgun is legalized in all fifty states as of 2013. The last state to enact thus legislation was illnois. But, some states required gun owners to obtain permits though other states do not entail permits. Supporters of concealed handgun say that criminals are less likely to attack someone they believe to be armed. They refer to the 2nd Amendment's "right of the people to keep and bear arms," and claim that most adults who legally carry a concealed gun are law-abiding citizens and they tend to do use firearms wisely. The adversaries of concealed gun reason that ascension of gun ownership leads to further gun crime and unintentional gun injuries. They resist that concealed handguns upsurge the chances of opinions becoming fatal, and that society would be safer with fewer guns on the street.

There is an appalling, despicable lack of gun control in the United States. In my opinion the manner in which the issue of gun control is approached in this country is bordering on criminal negligence in and of itself. The insanity surrounding this controversial issue is taking the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights in the United States constitution way too far. I ask myself this question, could the Founding Fathers of this amazing country have possibly envisioned a world in which teenagers could casually walk into a classroom, pull out a loaded pistol and cold bloodily murder their teachers and fellow classmates? I think not. I would posit that these fine men, these symbols of American liberty and democracy would turn in their graves if they could see how their words, their intentions, were manipulated and grossly misinterpreted, to serve the purposes of those who pretend to be protecting the rights of their fellow American Citizens. On the contrary, it is my belief that they, the politicians, are recklessly endangering those whose rights they claim to be protecting. The Government needs to take a hard, honest look at the tragic loss of life that occurs in this country due to gun shootings, both intentional and accidental. The government needs to assume responsibility for this outrageous situation and realize that gun control in the United States needs to be Federally regulated, sooner rather than later.

It is now uncommon for a young adult to get a car as a gift ; they get the perfect gift, a Carbine rifle. Some states regulate that teenagers are allowed and able to own or possess a gun. Firearms were not all menacing as they are now. They evolved as crime became worse. Because of how dangerous the firearm itself has become, regulations were put in place. However, the current laws are not enough. It is safe to say that individuals are the reason why fully automatic firearms are now banned, because the problem is the people, holding the guns. Furthermore, the government should implement more gun control laws. The United States needs gun reforms because tragic events, such as accidental deaths, homicides, mass murders, and suicides could be prevented by implementing tougher punishments on negligent gun owners.