Gun Control Debate Analysis

The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists

Miller case that made it to the supreme court in 1939. In The Handgun Control Dbate , it talks about if the 2nd amendment says if youre aloud to have a gun for militia purposes or if you can have a gun just to have one. The text writes "..spectically mention millers lack of memebership in the milita, the NBA therefore concludes that individual not in the military have a right to bear arms as long as they do some for miliarty purpose." This is important because the right to bear arm isnt only to have a gun but for other purpose too. These examples show why and how people own a gun.

The author is to show democrats and liberals the opposite side and why conservatives do not want a ban on guns or even gun control . He is trying to see the gun debate argument on both sides. Although they are pro guns they also are pro gun control. The purpose of this article is to educate and try to reason with those who do not see the other side of the gun debate article. This article shows the common ground that both liberals and conservatives may agree on. Rural America wants a voice and wants to be understood. Many liberals often label guns as bad and believe that should be banned. Leonard analyzes both points of view and shows both sides. “But again, where you might blame the guns, they don’t. They blame the shooters.” (Rob Leonard).

Implementing a stricter Gun Control legislation has been one of the most controversial subjects among government and society in America for many years. After researching this issue and looking into the country’s history, I believe it would be safe to say that the Gun Control debate began derivatively from the obscurity of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, the trafficking to illegitimate owners, the occurrence of numerous tragic events in this country in conjunction with mental illness, and the evolution of gun violence.

In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of

The ongoing battle between legislator and citizens over gun control seems that it will go on forever. There have been many research studies since the beginning, throughout the evolution and expansion of gun control and where it stands today to provide the best answers and suggestions of improvement. The war between anti-gun and gun activists rages on in order to understand the primary purpose for gun control, and what the current policies are. Arguments such as self-protection, and if evidence suggests that gun control reduces violent crime, and finally the laws that have eroded due to mass shootings and the mentally ill.

It is estimated that firearms are used 2,500,000 times per year to defend innocent people against crime, which adds up to about 600,000 lives that are saved by other people who had firearms to protect people. These 600,000 lives are three hundred times more lives that are murdered in the United States (Vizzard 889).Gun violence and gun laws have been in the spotlight for the past few years. There is great controversy about The Second Amendment which declares “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell 1). Many disagree with The Second Amendment and how it is enforced in different states. Due to the difference of opinion about gun ownership, public safety, and mass shootings, gun control is a very controversial topic. When used correctly, firearms and guns protect people. If the right to own a firearm is taken away, citizen’s sense of

Today in the United States gun control is a topic of immense debate, because of the shooting that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary located in Newtown, Connecticut. This most recent tragic event ended the lives of 20 students and six adults. Similar events have occurred across the United States at a movie theater in Colorado, on college campuses in Texas and Virginia, or at the grocery store in Arizona each destroying families in many communities. The questions deserving consideration is have the American people had enough lives destroyed by these horrible events and are Americans ready for the federal government to impose stricter gun control laws. Learning Team C is for stricter gun control laws and will

The debate over gun control in America continues to trouble politicians to this day. According to the constitution, the second amendment gives us the right to bear arms (U.S. Const.). Many different interpretations of what precisely the amendment means exist in this country. However, the two main sides include pro gun control and against gun control. In this paper, we will weigh the pros and cons of both sides and with any luck approach a conclusion on what side performs a superior job. People interpret gun control as the problem, but realistically gun control laws do not cause the issues, however the people that enforce said laws do. Scrutiny over gun control reached an all time high recently and addressing the scrutiny helps find the solution.

Even if you ban guns, that’s not going to prohibit people from getting guns if they really want them. Think about it. Drugs are illegal, yet people still use drugs. Machine

This paper explores gun control through five main articles. There are many standpoints that take place due to the diversity of the articles used. Gun control is a global topic and it comes up in the news all of the time. It affects society because of its wide range of topics it is involved in. This paper talks about different standpoints on gun control, from it why it should be in place, to why it shouldn 't be in place, to how other countries have used it. It includes statistics about mass shootings and other countries gun control. This paper is perfect for the avid gun owner to the full fledged second amendment supporter all the way to insanely left wing democrats who hate guns. All of the sources are reliable and hold true factuality about this topic. Some come from the government, and some come from other credible websites that specialize in guns and gun control topics.

The controversial issue of gun control is one of the most debatable topics among politicians and civilians alike. This is because of the complexity of gun control and the long history that is related to the subject. Gun control is typically an effort, by the government, to create legislation that regulates the sale and use of firearms within the country. There are various arguments that surround this topic which include gun-related violence, accidents, self-defense, murders, suicide, constitutional rights, and so on. James Q. Wilson, a professor who has taught at Pepperdine University, Harvard University, and the University of California, Los Angeles, and a published author of several books, take a negative stance on the subject of gun control. Wilson contributed to the gun control debate in the last few years with his written op-ed article. According to Wilson, there is no possible method to eradicate the hundreds and millions of guns that exist within the country, restrictive gun laws will not significantly affect the United States’ murder rate, and that guns play an important role in self-defense in everyday lives. Contrary to what Wilson believes, strict gun control is necessary and should be enforced to ensure public safety because gun laws have the power to produce a positive outcome in the long run, reduce gun-related violence, and reduce the numerous risks that gun ownership open.

Gun control is a hot issue in the United States, especially recently in the wake of many mass shootings. The gun control debate is an issue that tends to divide people, you either support stricter gun laws or you stand for current gun freedoms, the majority of people on both sides of the debate feel strongly about their opinions. Contrary to what many believe, gun ownership is actually beneficial to citizens. There is evidence to support the ideas that gun ownership deters crime, gun control laws deny people a sense of safety, and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides.

In many recent events, the controversy over gun control has risen to its peak. Heated debates from people of all cultures have argued about this topic. Most European countries though have come to the conclusion that some form of gun control is necessary, such as restricting the purchase of certain types of firearms. But in America, many argue that the Second Amendment protects our right to own guns or that we need guns for our own protection. On the other hand, others argue that guns are the cause of many deaths in the U.S or that it makes us feel unsafe. Even though the Second Amendment protects our right to bear arms, stronger gun control would greatly enhance the safety of U.S citizens, such as following the footsteps of

Gun control is perhaps one of the utmost controversial issues in this country, but seemingly not so strong in others. The debate has been present since before the bloody birth of the United States. It was, however, not as pressed then as it is now. There are several factors that contribute to this growing debate. Among such arguments include: the use of guns in self defense, civilian possession of machine guns and assault rifles, and the 2nd amendment's inclusion of the militia’s right to own guns to protect people and country if need be. An individual is entitled to their right to own guns, however, there should be strict regulations on guns and gun ownership.