Gun Control Effects

School shootings in the United States have ignited national debate about how to decrease gun violence. These controversial debates have focused entirely on issues associated to gun control. Both adversaries and supporters of gun control have used their personal views and utilized media attention in order to advance their claims. Anti-gun activists suggest the implementation of the Australian style gun control system could be a favorable policy in the United States. Contrary to anti-gun ideology, pro-gun opponents dispute that the Second Amendment protects citizens with their right to bear arms. Creating an Australian style gun control system will not be successful because removing guns from citizens

There are an abundance of causes and effects in the way guns are used, purchased, and sold – legally or illegally. A few causes include how guns are kept (with a safety and locked away or not), and in the way guns are obtained. The effects of these acts are, peoples state of mind, and the criticisms law enforcement may receive. Thought of as technical and firm, the laws about guns can easily be bypassed by criminals and people who are not in the right frame of mind.

Statistical analysis about states in the U.S. proves the correlation between strict gun control policies and deaths related to firearms to the least extent. According to an article published by Richard Florida on CityLab, a research shows that states with stricter gun control have fewer gun-related fatalities. The study in the article was conducted by researchers at Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard School of Public Health. Researchers measured “legislative strength” of gun control policies in each state using data from Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Specifically, the elements that the researchers include when accounting for “legislative strength” are:

Many people around the United States are victims of shootings, whether they be school shootings, mass shootings, or Terrorist Attacks. There seem to be two common ideas either support or oppose gun control. In the United States, many gun control supporters believe that guns are the reason mass shootings happen while gun control opponents believe that people are the cause of mass shootings. But they both want the people in the United States to be safe, whether that is from government tyranny, mass shootings, gun violence, or mental health.

The United States has always a gun and hunting culture starting from the birth of the country itself. The men who fought in the war of independence were citizens who owned their own muskets. However the issue of gun control can be traced back to the Civil War, as new African-American citizens needed to protect themselves from their previous owners in the south that would often hunt them down. The problematic of gun control have changed greatly due to the evolution of times. From the late twentieth century until today, gun control has been highly debated because of recurrent mass shootings, such as Columbine, such as Sandy Hook, such as Virginia Tech, such as San Bernardino, and such as Roseburg - just to name a few. Many have pleaded for thorough background checks to prevent convicts or the mentally handicapped from owning guns, while others argue that US citizens should follow in the steps of advanced European countries and no longer possess these lethal weapons. Others who are often leaning to the right argue that this a fundamental right that defines americanism and shapes American pride and historic culture. However recurrent mass shootings are nothing to be proud of.

Gun control activist feel that the numerous of different types of guns in the hands of Americans is too great and dangerous. There are about 240,000,000 guns circulating across the nation made up 300,000,00 citizens (SOURCE). Gun control supporters believe that more guns lead to more violence and gun crime. These supporters note about the extreme strict gun laws in countries such as the United Kingdom and Japan and compare the gun number to gun violence. The ratio in those countries is closely one hundred times lesser than that of the United States with 0.4 deaths per one hundred thousand people. However, the 14 deadliest mass shooting in the world, only half of them happened in the United States. Although, there was a decline in gun crimes during the 1990’s, there has been a rise since 2010(source). Closely thirty thousand people a year in the United States die as a result of firearms. Over the years there have been traumatic events involving firearms, such as Columbine, and most recent Las Vegas shooting. Semi-automatic weapons were involved in those massacres, which resulted the high death tolls in mass shootings. So, the debate continues whether or not the public should be allowed to have legal access to these kinds of weapons. The second Amendment of the Constitution states the right for American Citizens to keep and bear arms and shall not be infringed. Still, gun control supporters argue about to what extent the amendment protects. Furthermore, the debate involves the weapons that are similar to the national military and law enforcement fire arms, and wheter or not the general public should have the right to own them. Gun control supports state that

Over the past year, the topic of gun control has received more and more attention. In America, gun control is a very serious issue. The reason why people feel that gun ownership is such a big problem is because there have been more tragic shootings in recent years. Moreover, many people lose their lives by them each year. Conservatives will say that guns are used for protection, and more guns will equal less crime. In the other hand, others will say guns should not be owned by anyone. It should only use by the police or law enforcement because more guns will equal more violence. I believe America does not want any more mass shootings, so it should be a gun control. Even though some people believe it is a right to carry firearms but it should be outlawed because it is too easy for criminals to get handguns and too many innocent people are dying from accidental shootings.

There has been a huge increase of gun related deaths in the US United States and the related stories have been all over the news and newspapers. Taking guns out of circulation could be helpful, but is not likely to completely solve the problem. A current issue in the United States is gun control, and whether or not the government can, or should take away our right to own them is the big debate. There have been numerous situations covered by the news media where guns have been used to take lives in an outburst of anger, or during a mental breakdown of some kind. Currently, it seems that the government is trying to take away all guns including ones that people use for sport, hunting and self-defense.

effect on gun control? There have been many studies done that says it does. But, the question is,

Gun control is a hot issue in the United States, especially recently in the wake of many mass shootings. The gun control debate is an issue that tends to divide people, you either support stricter gun laws or you stand for current gun freedoms, the majority of people on both sides of the debate feel strongly about their opinions. Contrary to what many believe, gun ownership is actually beneficial to citizens. There is evidence to support the ideas that gun ownership deters crime, gun control laws deny people a sense of safety, and lower gun ownership rates do not prevent suicides.

On September 13, 1994, Title XI of theFederal Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 took effect. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied the "assault weapon" ban and other gun control attempts, and found "insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence,"

American history is an overflowing river filled with gun accounts. Guns have made a major turn in our society. The right to own a gun is one of the First Ten Amendment in the Constitution. This right is for protection, however, some people have and continue to misuse the right. In early history guns were much more used for protection purposes than they are today. Gun violence is occurring very often in the US. Not only violence, but accidents also occur with guns too. Numerous people feel insecure living in a society where many people can own a gun. Guns should not be an item permitted to be owned by common people. The influence of guns has greatly made a negative effect on our society.

America is famous with the freedom that is granted from the ounders, which includes the possession of a firearm as stated in the Second Amendment. And that’s why people are asking themselves do we really want to take our freedom of having a gun as our basic right as citizens. And the answer is yes. We need to have a gun control because we are basically killing each other not defending our civil rights to own a gun, but because we don’t like someone or just to prove ourselves to others. This is not what the Founders of the Constitution were thinking back

What do you think about gun control? Gun control is a widely discussed topic in the United States. It is contemplated so much because of gun violence and the way other countries have reacted to gun control laws. Also, President Obama is looking for ways to help reduce gun violence without passing gun control laws.

In this research, the perception of the Second Amendment is discussed bearing in consideration of some consequences of the misuse of firearms by individuals who are not military. This essay develops one of the disturbing targets, which it is the amount of weapons that civilians are allowed without any limitation, and how backgrounds check are handled. And because of no restriction, how an object that was created to defense became the originator of sadness and division in the humanity. Also, the influence of the National Rifle Association for the business is discussed and the revenue that comes from gun industry. The proposal that democrat candidate Hilary Clinton made on the issue, expressing her intention of limiting the regulations of selling guns.