Gun Control: Good Or Bad?

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. If gun laws become opposed to the law, then only criminals will have guns. Stricter gun laws will not stop a madman from killing. In fact, 34% of mass shooters were prohibited from owning weapons; although, a surveyed showed 57% of gun owners believe guns are too easy to buy and 35% of people who carry guns would make Americans feel safer. Gun control will only affect the law-biding citizens simultaneously as the demand of illegal weapons on the black-market increases. Background checks will only restrict criminals from legally buying a firearm, but that does not stop a mentally ill person; which are usually the ones to start a shooting massacre. The second amendment literally states “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Protected by the second amendment, it will be hard to regulate guns because now every single individual has a right to bear arms. For example, the Texas Baptist church shooter was gun downed by an armed citizen. Had there been stricter gun laws in Texas towards not being able to have a concealed firearm in public, the shooter could have gotten away. People should have the right to exercise the second amendment; therefore, gun control will not work because criminals will always find a way to obtain guns, supply and demand on the black market will increase and there are more existing weapons than people in the U.S.

I would bet most people don’t agree with gun control, and this problem is occuring so much more often especially with all the mass murders and people getting shot and killed here and there. If guns are taken away that will take away the right for people to protect themselves, their hunting rights, but can be used as a source of results in terrorism.

In light of the recent shooting that took place at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, the issue about gun control is a hot topic. According to recent statistics, gun ownership helps and harms people. 270 million American citizens own firearms, and people use guns over eighty times more frequently to protect lives rather than killing others senselessly; however, 32,000 gun-related deaths occur every year in the United States alone (Spies par. 2, “A Factual Look at Guns in America”). Many people in the country have positive and negative views on the subject of gun control. When they come together and find a common ground on this issue, guns might not be such a controversial issue. Though many positive and negative views exist, laws and regulations with slight restrictions that appease both sides of gun control can ease the tension over this issue and possibly solve it.

There are many people who believe that having strict regulations on guns is beneficial, and then there are those who believe that everyone has the right to have guns. Some of the pros of gun control are; it lowers the amount of gun related deaths, guns are rarely used for self defense, less suicides, and the majority of mass murders use weapons. The cons of gun control are; criminals will break the law, it takes power from the people, helps deter crime, creates hostility.

The topic that I have chosen to write about is should there be more gun control laws be enacted. What does gun control do you may ask? Gun control is any kind of firearm that is bought or sold. What will be in the essay will be different things of Pros and Cons on the different things that gun control is in. The gun control law should not be enforced more is should be managed better for people who do not know what they are doing. The Second Amendment protects the people the rights to own guns. As us the people we have the right to bare arms for the need of protecting ourselves.

respective lands, thus perhaps adopting some of their legislation will provide what is needed in

The debate over gun control has been raging through the American political systems for years. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession. Pro-gun control activists

Some of the guns used in these shootings were purchased illegally, but in most cases, such as the Virginia Tech shooting, they were purchased legally (Griffin). In order to buy guns legally the stores must run a background check on the person, and currently there is no way of knowing if the person suffers from a mental illness especially if the person has never gone to a doctor for it. While the background checks are necessary they are not all that helpful because most of the crimes committed with guns involve guns that were purchased illegally. The people who are buying guns legally are typically purchasing them for self and home protection These people will most likely only shoot their guns at a range. Surveys of inmates have shown that if they thought that there was a gun in a house they would avoid it. If there were better means of stopping illegal guns the number of crimes committed with guns would drop

We have all heard of all the tragedies throughout the country regarding guns. According to the President (2013) "We know that we cannot stop every act of violence with guns, but what if we tried to stop even one?" Weapon controls in the U.S. is structured at a state level and each state has their own restrictions on gun control. In different parts of the nation, there is significantly more resistant to firearm laws. For instance, in Texas, the gun law permits individuals to carry handguns on their side like in the cowboy era. In Kansas, firearm owner is not required to have a permit to concealed weapon. In Missouri there is not required that a gun salesman to have a background check or a waiting period. However, there is a requirement to take a gun class, once you pass the class a buyer can purchase a gun then register it with the sheriff department. In California a person can petition the court to remove a firearm from a family member capable of violence.

With the recent outbreak of Mass shootings in the United States, more and more people are starting to voice their opinions about gun control. Some are in favor of gun control and some people are against

America is the most well armed nation in the world. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the second Amendment, which states “The Right to Bear Arm”. This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms. In the freedictionary.com, weapon is defined as, an instrument of attack or defense in combat, as a gun, missile, or sword. There are many kinds of weapons and almost all of them are illegal to use without registration. Weapons are changing over times. Looking back from millions of years ago, Wikipedia wrote that chimpanzees are the first one to be the target of human being using those weapons such as sharp stones and spears. Since then, thousands of weapons are invented, for example, small arm guns. They

Is gun control a bad or good thing? Would taking away guns prevent or increase criminal behavior? The debate on gun control started after several massacres in the United States. There became an extremely opposed opinion between having guns and not having guns. People became to blame the gun not the person using the gun. This way of thinking created fear against guns. Due to the people fearing guns the legislature proceeded with caution to allow people the right to bear arms. In the United States laws are being made to keep America safe from harmful people. If not careful guns can become harmful causing deaths, massacres, yet there are laws to prevent criminals to obtaining a gun there are always loopholes.

My opinion on gun control is that we should have it because what if something like a disease happen to us and the doctor can't find a cure to it and it a put break but then it a big outbreak and cant stop it were going to if we have gun control but then on the plus if we have gun control then there wont be more school shooting A boycott is another form of activism. In a boycott against a business, people protest the actions

My personal view on gun control is for less gun control. It makes no sense the way people place most of the blame on the tool instead of the person. The second amendment is in our constitution on our founder's belief that we should be able to own a gun to protect our liberties. Looking back in history it was privately owned guns which helped colonist defend themselves from British rule. Meaning that if our government where get out of hand we the people would have the means to defend ourselves. We are lucky to be able to do this since many other countries control their citizens lives and are unable to fight back. Gun laws are punishing laws abiding citizens. The media placing the blame of school shootings on guns is ridiculous. These are merely

The debate over gun control in the U.S today is not merely as welcomed today as it was in the early 1700’s because of controversy, misunderstanding of the law, and the danger guns cause. In 1791 James Madison had written the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights makes up the first 10 amendments in the Constitution. Madison had to create this Bill of Rights in order to win over the state of New York in order to rewrite the Constitution himself. The right to keep and bear arms is the second amendment in our Constitution. This law itself has always been a major priority and issue since it was created, and it is still a large issue today.