Gun Control Laws Research Paper

The first argument of people in favor of gun control is, of course, If people don’t have guns, they can’t kill people (or as many people). This makes sense because most mass mass killings and murders are a result of a person with bad intent gaining possession of a gun. However, would a stricter gun policy really help? People against gun control think not. There are various subjective arguments but the facts are simple, the correlation between accessibility of guns and crime with guns, if any, is that the less accessible the guns are the higher the gun violence is. This is made very clear with studies from other countries who have very strict gun control policies. Which only brings us back to the idea that guns are just neutral objects and can only be controlled by the person in possession of the weapon.

Gun control is a controversial issue for a long time around the world, particularly in U.S. because of a lots of mass shooting in school and public places. The second Amendment of the U.S. constitution is one of the shortest in all of the bill of right, it was written by the time period of American’s birth and it is the spirit of self-defense that help the new citizens of U.S. win their own freedom from the British. But now as the gun shooting problem happening every day in America, this gun control problem has gradually become to a hot issue. Compare to other countries like Britain, Canada, Japan, China, the difference between U.S. and those countries is in these countries to get a firearm is a very difficult thing

Once every thirteen seconds an American uses a gun to protect themselves (Harris). Americans having to use their guns that frequently is not the ideal situation, but without having guns once every thirteen seconds a person would die from an act of violence. Gun control should not be stricter in the United States because, guns are an excellent source of protection, guns can lower crime rates, and gun control laws only affects law abiding citizens.

“The right to bear arms”, an amendment so prioritized by our founding fathers that it earned the very second spot on the list of birth rights as Americans. However, with constant tragedies striking the United States, such as massacres in public high schools and universities, mall shootings, and attempted assassinations on state representatives, it’s no wonder law makers are constantly debating the topic of gun control.

A hot-button topic in the world of U.S. politics today is the controversy over whether or not new gun laws need to be instituted to keep Americans safe. We are a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and one that sticks to traditional values. With this, comes a great deal of incongruity, which makes for a very sensitive debate on gun control. On one side of the spectrum, we have those who take a more liberal stance; while they do in fact support the second amendment, there is no doubt that the U.S. has evolved significantly since the Constitution was written, hence creating a need for strict gun laws. On the other side of the spectrum, conservatives argue that as soon as executive action inhibits the fundamental principles in which

Gun control is a law that controls how guns are sold and used, and who can own them. Allowing people to possess and use a gun with legal documents in the United States is legal. There have been arguments on whether or not is should be legal to own a gun as some people see it as beneficial and others do not. It is believed that guns are beneficial to have, and they are there because we need to be able to protect ourselves. We should not allow the government to have power over gun control for many reasons including the loss of tradition of hunting, not being able to protect ourselves, and simply because of the second amendment.

On the opposing side, some others may say that the equation of more guns equals less crime is absolutely absurd. Sabina Thaler the author against guns states “crime victims uniformly use guns in self-defense is false. Women, for example, are less likely to use guns to protect themselves and are in fact in greater danger when doing so.” This statistic will help show that even if you have a gun to protect yourself, you might put

In this section the author talks about the Second Amendment how it is strangely phrased and for most of American history, its meaning was thought to be somewhat murky. “A well-regulated militia composed of the body of the people, being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Gun control is a very touchy subject. I don't believe that taking the guns away from the law abiding citizens is the correct way to go about this issue. The criminals are the ones not going thru the proper ways to buy a firearm. Right now there are 2 background checks that you go thru to buy a firearm. One is state and the other is federal. The Democrats believe there should be more background checks that potential gun owners should go thru. They also believe that banning certain guns and items for guns will help the issue. The most recent shooting was done with a handgun and a shotgun. There has been a big political debate over the gun control issue. How much is too much and how much is not enough? This is the real question. Some people feel

​In the news today, there have been many shootings around the United States, putting the public in an uproar. Stricter gun laws will not solve the problem because criminals will still have guns. People should be able to protect their home.

Although many argue that stricter gun laws wouldn’t do anything, there’s proof in other countries that gun laws are efficient in bringing down the gun violence. After the Port Arthur massacre in Australia the government made stricter gun laws and there hasn’t been a mass shooting in the country since (BBC, 2017). Since Australia enforced stricter gun control laws there has been a decrease in crime, murder, and mass shootings are completely non existent. This proves that having stricter gun laws would benefit the country by reducing crime and gun violence. When the founding fathers wrote the second amendment which is the right to bear arms they lived in a society where everything was a Threat. Bears, mountain lions, wolves and more wildlife that posed danger to them but now we have other methods of dealing with wildlife and almost all places in the country are urbanized so the threat of getting attacked by a wild animal is very unlikely. Furthermore back then people only had access to Muskets and revolvers which are very slow compared to the weapons of

I think that you should be able to have guns in public because you have to be able to protect yourself from threats, if not you are unable to protect yourself or anyone very effectively. Also have you realized that before gun control there were not nearly as many problems and worries about school shootings bomb threats and all that stupid stuff. I don't believe that taking away guns and weapons from public areas shouldn’t be allowed and isn't it said that in the constitution that you have the right to bear arms so why can't you have them in public I just don't understand what they hope to accomplish. Constantly I can hear people complaining about how the government

One way the United States addresses gun control and gun violence is through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The Bureau is in charge of reducing the possible risk of public safety with illegal gun trafficking, criminal possession, and use of firearms, and enforcing compliance with federal laws, and regulation of the gun industry.

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (“The Constitution of the United States,” Amendment 2).” These fourteen straightforward words in the Bill of Rights have been a debate for most of our history. While criminals are loading up on combat weapons, why should the citizens have a hard time just to own a hand gun? The government needs to learn that their attempts on gun control does not work, gun control makes it hard for the honest citizens to keep their family safe from criminals and

“Gun control (or firearms regulation) is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians” (Wikipedia). Some people presume that this means banning guns. In actuality, gun control only acts to protect citizens through enforcing the appropriate use of firearms; it does not ban the weapon. By implementing stricter gun laws and regulations, there would be a large decrease in death rates and help prevent violence in the United States of America.