Stossel's Research Essay: The Right To Bear Arms

“Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the legal use of guns” (pg.125). Author James Q. Wilson, a professor of management and public policy at the University of California in Los Angeles writes the article “Just Take Away Their Guns” to provide the American public with evidence of why taking away their guns will have little effect on crime in the United States. “Just Take Away Their Guns” was published into the New York Times Magazine in March, 1994. Professor Wilson, author of many books such as “Thinking about Crime,” “Bureaucracy,” “The Moral Sense,” and “Moral Judgment” uses statistics to advocate for perspective on gun control. The article not only addresses the use of guns but also provides a lot of textual evidence to support the author’s claims related to legal restraints on lawful purchases of guns. Firearms present in the homes of American citizens, while potentially dangerous, provide these citizens with a sense of security.

Gun control is a controversial issue for a long time around the world, particularly in U.S. because of a lots of mass shooting in school and public places. The second Amendment of the U.S. constitution is one of the shortest in all of the bill of right, it was written by the time period of American’s birth and it is the spirit of self-defense that help the new citizens of U.S. win their own freedom from the British. But now as the gun shooting problem happening every day in America, this gun control problem has gradually become to a hot issue. Compare to other countries like Britain, Canada, Japan, China, the difference between U.S. and those countries is in these countries to get a firearm is a very difficult thing

A hot-button topic in the world of U.S. politics today is the controversy over whether or not new gun laws need to be instituted to keep Americans safe. We are a nation that believes in the Second Amendment, and one that sticks to traditional values. With this, comes a great deal of incongruity, which makes for a very sensitive debate on gun control. On one side of the spectrum, we have those who take a more liberal stance; while they do in fact support the second amendment, there is no doubt that the U.S. has evolved significantly since the Constitution was written, hence creating a need for strict gun laws. On the other side of the spectrum, conservatives argue that as soon as executive action inhibits the fundamental principles in which

Gun control is a law that controls how guns are sold and used, and who can own them. Allowing people to possess and use a gun with legal documents in the United States is legal. There have been arguments on whether or not is should be legal to own a gun as some people see it as beneficial and others do not. It is believed that guns are beneficial to have, and they are there because we need to be able to protect ourselves. We should not allow the government to have power over gun control for many reasons including the loss of tradition of hunting, not being able to protect ourselves, and simply because of the second amendment.

ProCon.org recently featured an article that studied gun control. “Stricter state gun laws associated with fewer gun deaths, study finds.” The article discussed gun control laws in states with stricter laws tend to have lower rates of gun related homicides, and a suicide (ProCon para. 1) Gun control in the United States is becoming a wide spread issue and is becoming a problem everywhere. Although I am living in a city with uprising crime that has been skyrocketing over the years, I wasn’t aware of this being an issue all over the United States. I decided to do some research to find out whether I am in favor of Gun control laws or not. After reviewing many articles for and against gun control, I found out that I do in fact agree with

Preserving a well-regulated militia has been interpreted to protect weapons with a “judicial recognized militia-type weapon (Fafarman, p. 191).” United States v. Miller serves as a foundation case for this as it set a precedent of what actually defines a militia-type weapon. The sawed-off shotgun failed to embody basic traits of military equipment or common defense; therefore it was ruled unfit to contribute to a well-regulated militia. A sawed-off shotgun’s shooting pattern seems to promote seemingly terroristic activity rather than common defense, concluding that

Gun control; two words that have many people on the edge of their seats. One of the most controversial issues in America currently, and it comes up time and time again when another person is killed from gunfire. Some people believe the issue is a personal one. “Let me have my guns,” they say. The realistic questions to ask them in response are; where will you get “your guns?” How responsible are you? What is your intention with these guns? Have you ever committed a felony? These are not unreasonable questions. In most background checks these questions are asked. However, there are too many loopholes in the system for these checks to matter. The majority of people who have guns aren’t getting them from the black market; most are buying them legally. A lot of people often buy them at gun shows as well, where, “Gun-show organizers say private sellers typically disregard the laws.” (Tampa Bay Times) The ethical question here is this; Is it right to allow gun violence to continue when there are proactive laws that could be enacted to prevent it?

Since its creation the firearm has served as man’s best means of self preservation, has helped in the expansion of frontiers, and has served to help many, including Americans, to secure and enforce their rights and maintain democracy. Even today our military uses firepower to prevent the spread of tyranny throughout the world. We refer to our troops as “armed forces” and the necessity of maintaining our firepower has been recognized throughout the human history, which the firearm has helped to shape. The founding fathers of this nation recognized the necessity of arming the average citizen to protect the rights so dearly purchased through armed revolution, and it was these men, all veterans of that revolution, that made it part of our

Introduced to the New World in approximately 1607, firearms and America resemble siamese twins; you can’t have one without the other. Over time, guns have become a crucial part of American society, and to many, the ability to carry a firearm defines their liberties as a citizen. For example, without the ability to carry weapons freely, winning the American Revolution may not have been possible. But, on the contrary, many of the school shootings that occur in today's society could be prevented should the individuals that commit them be restricted to purchase a firearm. For negative reasons like that, the government has been forced to step in and try to regulate the average citizen’s right to carry a concealed weapon through the picking apart of the 2nd amendment and the addition of the Brady Bill in 1993. Because of this, many feel that by limiting their ability to carry weapons, the government is infringing upon their constitutional rights and civil liberties as an

The number of people that are died due to the lack of gun laws in the USA In 2016. This is the number from January to August alone. They numbers are made up of mothers, Fathers, daughters, sons, role models… the list could go on. Not all are innocent, but I can assure you that if there were stricter gun laws in the US that number would be significantly lower.

That is to say, the absence of mandatory background checks, and making gun licenses a legal requirement for the possession and/or ownership of firearms, will still facilitate the job of the mentally-ill and gangs to commit crimes. The problem is that the gun rights groups, whether the NRA or local advocacy groups all around the U.S, have a great distaste for compromise, and as result, passing such fair gun regulations becomes extremely difficult. But to frame it very clearly, the solution for the crime issue is neither banning guns completely nor giving full freedom for possession and ownership, it is simply the balancing gun rights with realistic restrictions that promote public safety. However, neither gun rights nor gun control advocacy groups acknowledge that fact although the data and studies support it. A deeper look into the development of gun rights and gun control agendas in the US beginning with the pre-Civil War era, explains why the two sides of the debate are so extreme about their ideologies.

Guns, they have come a long way since the muzzleloaders our founding fathers first used, but does that change what they are or what they represent? Many people think that our modern technology needs to be regulated by the government. Members of our government agree with these people, using such terms as implied powers as there excuse for trying to hack away at our Second Amendment rights. Our government should not make gun laws more strict, it not only goes against our constitutional rights but also puts civilians in harm of violent crimes such as murder and mass shootings.

The right to bear arms is an issue even when individuals don't pay much mind to it. It's every where and is surrounding the world at every stake. Fights, arguments, low self-esteem, homicides, suicides, murder, crimes, drive bys, school shootings, self defence all revolve around guns. Not everything bad like murder or killing is a gun’s fault in action. Ownership in guns are 31% female and 37% male. Of these owners 42% of them have high school diplomas or less. 37% of whites, 32% of blacks, and 33% of nonwhites. Highest rate of ownership of guns in ages 50-64 is 45%. We should have the ability to have possession of a gun, however the state should have a boundary of laws and regulations to owning one.

After many trial and error attempts of the United States, it was mutually determined that

The main weapon used for murder or manslaughter is handguns. There is no other weapon as gun that can kill someone in seconds. 72% of handguns are used in homicides are handguns. The other types of guns include rifles and shotguns. In article “weapon use and violent crime” Craig Perkins states “Between 1993 and 2001, about 26% (or an annual average of 2.3 million) of the estimated 8.9 million violent crimes in the United States were committed by offenders armed with guns, knives, or objects used as weapons. Basically guns are the main reason for criminals to commit crimes such as killing of innocent citizen or robberies. These statistics show that numbers are increasing every year. To stop these number from increasing government, need strict rule of checking background before selling gun to any citizen. This will benefits government as well as citizen.