Gun Control Should Not Be Banned Essay

One of the main topics concerning gun control is crime rate. Crime rate could increase if guns are banned. It is so easy for criminals to get their hands on guns, whether they are illegal or not. Guns are not the problem in the country, it is the person with the weapon. It does not matter how much the government regulates gun control, they cannot regulate the people. Banning guns will not stop crime rate from going up. The U.S. has an estimated amount of 220+ million guns and machine tools, so criminals can easily make their own weapons (“Will You Be”). The United States will only be in more trouble if guns are banned. Banning guns does not mean criminals will automatically stop what they are doing. Most criminals illegally make and buy their own weapons, anyway. Most of the crimes committed are not with the use of a gun. Many are used with different types of weapons or tools. “Getting rid of guns does not get rid of violence. Some people think that

If gun control is regulated, then we will have less crime. Access to firearms makes killing easy, efficient, and impersonal, which increases the lethality of crime. Josh Sugarmann, the Executive Director of the Violence Policy Center has once said, "We recoil in horror and search for explanations, but we never face up to the obvious preventive measure: a ban on the handy killing machines that make crimes so easy.”Allowing untrained people to carry guns puts others at risk and it can result in self-inflicting injuries both by suicide and unintentional incidents. Gun violence in America kills more than 30,000 and injures almost 70,000 each year. Guns can be misused and abused, which is why gun

President obama said at a press conference on October 01, 2015 “The solution to such violence is obvious. It cannot be this easy for somebody who wants to inflict harm on other people to get his or her hands on a gun.” (Simple Minded Gun Control). Gun control is a controversial issue worldwide. The reason why this has attracted so much attention is because not everyone is in favor of gun control and each side brings up excellent points about the issue. Research related to this issue strongly supports the claim that there SHOULD be more gun control laws. Three arguments that prove this position are (1) Incidents like Sandy Hook will be less likely to occur (2) It reduces the high rates of accidental deaths (3) As the years pass by and technology updates the laws should be up to date as well. Members from the National Rifles Association state that No law-abiding American should be forced to face evil with empty hands. I say I agree with President Obama there SHOULD be more gun control laws because it should not be as easy as it is for someone who wants to inflict harm on others to get their hands on a weapon.

Guns have become a serious issue in today’s society. There have been incalculable incidents that involved a gun causing physical harm to a person. This can occur when guns are not properly stored in a safe location. House Bill 75 has been proposed to help solve this problem. With this bill set in place, if a minor has the ability to access a firearm unauthorized, the person responsible for that firearm will receive criminal penalties. As a matter of a fact, there have been cases reported about this complication we face in today’s society. In spite of that fact, some may argue that there is no need for this Bill to exist. House bill 75, will definitely help out with gun control in America.

"Gun Control." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2016. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 30 Apr. 2016.

People committing crime has nothing to do with gun control; in fact, gun control laws have made it easier for them to kill, injure or hurt helpless citizens who abide by laws of our state. The effect of gun ownership in crime is theoretically ambiguous. It could either be the case that gun ownership increases the cost of crimes and thus discourage potential criminals, or it could also be that gun ownership rates make it easier for criminals to obtain guns, and thus causes more lethal crimes to occur. I believe that "Gun bans don 't disarm criminals, gun bans attract them" – Walter Mondale.

Crime cannot be prevented by gun control. Criminals can steal firearms, use a fake ID, or illegally manufacture firearms. A criminal can easily work around a background check if they don’t have a serious offense on their record. Also states with a higher gun ownership rate have a lower violent crime rate. On average when states makes stricter conceal and carry laws they see a spike of 10% in violent crimes(proton.org). Owning a gun is a deterrent for criminals, because when a criminal knows that many people in an area own firearms they are less likely to try to break entry in that area.

In the United States, people are able to carry handguns. This is because handguns are there to protect the owner from danger. However, there are certain who people are misusing these weapons there are lots of crimes that involve guns violence of all types such as homicides, suicides, and unintentional deaths but that does not mean people should not be allowed to carry guns. Getting rid of firearms is not the solution to reduce overall violence and self-harm.

Gun Control will not prevent gun violence. Criminals will still be able to get guns through different ways illegally. There are things like the black or grey market or the deep web where people can buy anything, like guns. Even if they made a gun registry, made people do a number of background checks, criminals would still be able to get guns in some way. A statistic shows that 79% of people threatened with a gun protected themselves with a gun (“Should More Gun Control Laws be Enacted?”). If the people protecting themselves didn’t have those guns, then they would most likely be dead, and the gun death statistic would go up.

This report analyzes gun control in the United States and evaluates whether guns should be banned.

“You won’t get gun control by disarming law-abiding citizens. There is only one way to get real gun control: Disarm the thugs and the criminals, lock them up and if you actually don’t throw the key, at least lose it for a long time....It’s a nasty truth ,but those who seek to inflict harm are not fazed with gun controllers.”- Ronald Reagen. Limiting gun ownership to mentally stable, law abiding citizens will do nothing positive for this country. Mr.Reagen couldn’t have said it any better in that quote.

In fact, gun control does not reduce Crimes. David Brooks, a New York Times columnist asserts “If they can’t find an easy way to get a new gun, they’ll surely find a new one of the 200 million guns that already exist in the country, or they’ll use a bomb or find another way” (qtd. in Gun Control: Reform). Banning guns will be meaningless to law breakers who will buy them illegally and will lead to more crime because criminals will be better armed than law abiding citizens (“Update: Gun Control”). If more law abiding citizens have guns, criminals are less likely to prey on people when there is a chance they will encounter armed resistance (“Does Gun Control…”). Also, Paul Bucher says “The problems aren’t the guns, it’s the guns in the wrong hands” (qtd. in Gun Control: Reform). People who use guns to commit crimes are not going to be affected by stronger gun restriction but the law abiding citizens will (“Special Interview…”). Another example of gun control that affects the wrong people is the assault weapon ban, several people testified that they had used guns which are now banned to defend their lives and to prevent crimes (“Update: Gun Control”). Moreover, to lower crime rate, stiffened gun control laws are not the way to go. Gun control is not a major factor in lowering crime rate (“Gun Control: Update”). Guns are not only

Guns do not kill people, people kill people. Guns are not the problem in today’s society. Criminals will kill regardless of gun control. Before guns were created, people were killing people. Yes a gun is a deadly weapon and yes people are killed from gun related incidents everyday, but guns do not have the ability to harm any one on their own. It is true that some of the largest mass murders have been shootings. Many tragedies have occurred because of one person with a gun (Refuting). However, those murderers would not have been stopped if a good guy with a gun didn’t stop them. If the police wouldn’t have stopped many of these killers, they would have continued to kill more people. It is known that many of these mass murders have occurred in gun-free zones. The Sandy Hook shooting happened on school grounds, Virginia Tech and Columbine also on school grounds, and Colorado movie theater shooting all

Almost every American knows about the situation with gun control. Does the second amendment give us the right to keep gun? Does the second amendment not give us the right to keep gun? Who should have guns? Should anybody have Guns? People ask and debate these questions every day. Gun violence has greatly increased in the last fifteen years. School shootings seem like a weekly thing now and it is heartbreaking and time to change the laws and protect are citizens better. Some people believe the government should make more strict laws and more background checks to keep guns out of the wrong hands, while others believe the second amendment should be repealed and take away the right to own a gun. William Safire believes the second amendment should be repealed and taken out of the constitution. Other people believe that owning a gun is their right and nobody can take that away from them, but William Safire thought of a way to replace the amendment with a new amendment.

Guns are weapons that propel a small metal shell, called a bullet at enormous speeds to where the bullet shell will hit its intended target and pierce through most likely skin like it was jell-o. Guns are used in 68 percent of murders, 41 percent of robbery offenses and 21 percent of aggravated assaults nationwide. According to data collected in 2011 by the FBI on gun use in crimes. Guns were made to get a step above the enemy in war, and now they are used in self defense and to prevent tyranny. Ever since 1771 with the bill of rights we have been able to lawfully carry a firearm to prevent a government uprising and keep a well formed militia which is just a group of people not necessarily a military. It just states that the common person can carry a weapon, although machine guns have been banned,